Before Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico’s rise to power last year, Slovakia was one of Taiwan’s strongest Central European partners. His predecessors Eduard Heger and Ludovit Odor were solid partners of Ukraine and Taiwan, as exemplified by their pro-western posture in the international arena. At the same time, then-Slovakian president Zuzana Caputova advocated for safeguarding democracy from authoritarian countries’ hybrid and conventional threats.
This paradigm was challenged ahead of the parliamentary elections last year, when the Smer party-led opposition promoted a totally different agenda when it comes to diplomatic and international affairs. In particular, it stressed the need to introduce a shift with regards to the Russia-Ukraine war by giving a priority to an immediate diplomatic solution rather than to keep providing weapons to Kyiv.
Within the same foreign policy agenda, Smer’s leader Fico underscored the importance of China as “a trade partner” while avoiding pressuring Beijing on human rights issues: Every state official, president or prime minister, no matter how powerful and influential, always walks down the red carpet in Beijing and seeks business opportunities.
Smer, thanks to the support from the populist Hlas party and far-right Slovak National Party, is now governing the country. In addition to the parliamentary election, another main event in Slovakian politics was the presidential election this year. Fico’s political partner, Slovakian President Peter Pellegrini of Hlas achieved a significant win in the second round against the pro-Western candidate Ivan Korcok. These two electoral results give us a key to understanding recent developments regarding Slovakia’s foreign policy strategy.
Slovakia’s new posture towards China and Taiwan became evident when Fico assumed power last year. The prime minister of Slovakia is one of the most prominent supporters of stronger economic and commercial relations with China, regardless of Beijing’s full economic warfare against the EU.
“China offers enormous trade opportunities and therefore cannot be overlooked,” he said after a meeting between leaders of the central and eastern European countries and China held in November last year.
Fico’s inclination towards China has roots that date back to his first term as prime minister in 2006. Since then, he downplayed Beijing’s human rights violations, and aggressive actions towards Taiwan and other countries in the South China Sea region. As for Fico, indeed, Bratislava should focus on the medium and long term benefits of a closer partnership with China. In that sense, economic interests at stake have to take precedence over any values-oriented concern.
An emblematic manifestation of this new course of action has been Fico’s visit to Bejing from Thursday last week to Tuesday, during which the two countries decided to establish a “Chinese-Slovak strategic partnership.” They said they “have reached broad consensus on their bilateral relations” and that they “do not have any unresolved issues between them.” China and Slovakia issued a joint statement which also included a reference to Taiwan.
In the section indicated as “political domain,” we can see a clear reference to how Slovakia’s foreign policy agenda is working under Fico.
“Slovakia reaffirmed its commitment to the ‘One China policy,’ that there is but one China in the world,” it said. “Slovakia opposes any attempts to interfere in China’s internal affairs, sovereignty and territorial integrity, including Taiwan.”
Two main aspects can be emphasized: A misrepresentation of the “one China policy,” as it is generally applied by the western countries, given that this concept has been used to spread the unfounded theory based on China’s “sovereignty” over Taiwan; the explicit reference to Taiwan as “China’s internal affairs.” It reproduces Bejing’s usual talk about a “Taiwan question” that is “purely one of its domestic affairs.”
This strategic adjustment brought about by Fico’s government does not come as a surprise, given his past actions and statements. What has changed dramatically during these decades is our perception of the stability of the global order and the way in which destabilizing powers such as China or Russia are trying to subvert rather than protect it.
With a Western world increasingly aware of the need to unite in the face of a growing assertiveness from authoritarian actors both in Europe and in Asia, Slovakia has to make a decision between two mutually incompatible international realities. Failing to do so would result in losing a like-minded partner such as Taiwan for many years to come.
Michele Maresca is an analyst at the online international law journal Il Caffe Geopolitico.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS