Before Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico’s rise to power last year, Slovakia was one of Taiwan’s strongest Central European partners. His predecessors Eduard Heger and Ludovit Odor were solid partners of Ukraine and Taiwan, as exemplified by their pro-western posture in the international arena. At the same time, then-Slovakian president Zuzana Caputova advocated for safeguarding democracy from authoritarian countries’ hybrid and conventional threats.
This paradigm was challenged ahead of the parliamentary elections last year, when the Smer party-led opposition promoted a totally different agenda when it comes to diplomatic and international affairs. In particular, it stressed the need to introduce a shift with regards to the Russia-Ukraine war by giving a priority to an immediate diplomatic solution rather than to keep providing weapons to Kyiv.
Within the same foreign policy agenda, Smer’s leader Fico underscored the importance of China as “a trade partner” while avoiding pressuring Beijing on human rights issues: Every state official, president or prime minister, no matter how powerful and influential, always walks down the red carpet in Beijing and seeks business opportunities.
Smer, thanks to the support from the populist Hlas party and far-right Slovak National Party, is now governing the country. In addition to the parliamentary election, another main event in Slovakian politics was the presidential election this year. Fico’s political partner, Slovakian President Peter Pellegrini of Hlas achieved a significant win in the second round against the pro-Western candidate Ivan Korcok. These two electoral results give us a key to understanding recent developments regarding Slovakia’s foreign policy strategy.
Slovakia’s new posture towards China and Taiwan became evident when Fico assumed power last year. The prime minister of Slovakia is one of the most prominent supporters of stronger economic and commercial relations with China, regardless of Beijing’s full economic warfare against the EU.
“China offers enormous trade opportunities and therefore cannot be overlooked,” he said after a meeting between leaders of the central and eastern European countries and China held in November last year.
Fico’s inclination towards China has roots that date back to his first term as prime minister in 2006. Since then, he downplayed Beijing’s human rights violations, and aggressive actions towards Taiwan and other countries in the South China Sea region. As for Fico, indeed, Bratislava should focus on the medium and long term benefits of a closer partnership with China. In that sense, economic interests at stake have to take precedence over any values-oriented concern.
An emblematic manifestation of this new course of action has been Fico’s visit to Bejing from Thursday last week to Tuesday, during which the two countries decided to establish a “Chinese-Slovak strategic partnership.” They said they “have reached broad consensus on their bilateral relations” and that they “do not have any unresolved issues between them.” China and Slovakia issued a joint statement which also included a reference to Taiwan.
In the section indicated as “political domain,” we can see a clear reference to how Slovakia’s foreign policy agenda is working under Fico.
“Slovakia reaffirmed its commitment to the ‘One China policy,’ that there is but one China in the world,” it said. “Slovakia opposes any attempts to interfere in China’s internal affairs, sovereignty and territorial integrity, including Taiwan.”
Two main aspects can be emphasized: A misrepresentation of the “one China policy,” as it is generally applied by the western countries, given that this concept has been used to spread the unfounded theory based on China’s “sovereignty” over Taiwan; the explicit reference to Taiwan as “China’s internal affairs.” It reproduces Bejing’s usual talk about a “Taiwan question” that is “purely one of its domestic affairs.”
This strategic adjustment brought about by Fico’s government does not come as a surprise, given his past actions and statements. What has changed dramatically during these decades is our perception of the stability of the global order and the way in which destabilizing powers such as China or Russia are trying to subvert rather than protect it.
With a Western world increasingly aware of the need to unite in the face of a growing assertiveness from authoritarian actors both in Europe and in Asia, Slovakia has to make a decision between two mutually incompatible international realities. Failing to do so would result in losing a like-minded partner such as Taiwan for many years to come.
Michele Maresca is an analyst at the online international law journal Il Caffe Geopolitico.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS