Even those without legal training know that the constitution is the most fundamental law of a country. Since the start of the legislative session, three legislators from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) coalition — KMT Legislator Wu Tsung-hsien (吳宗憲), KMT Legislator Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲) and TPP Legislator Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) — have prioritized the introduction of several amendments that would expand legislative powers.
The goal of these amendments is to help the opposition manipulate the constitutional system, making it easier to comply with the Chinese Communist Party’s requirements for Taiwan and allow the opposition to smoothly seize administrative resources.
Fortunately, the Cabinet followed the constitutional system and challenged the legislation in the Constitutional Court, allowing the judiciary to make a ruling on these harmful and unconstitutional provisions. The court’s ruling followed the spirit of the Constitution — they determined that most of the amendments were unconstitutional, especially those that would grant lawmakers broader investigative powers because they would lead to a situation where expanded legislative powers would undermine executive authority.
The Cabinet has acted entirely in accordance with the Constitution, yet Weng unexpectedly proposed that the Legislative Yuan need not comply with the court’s ruling. Alarmism like this is detrimental to the constitutional system. Weng and Huang each hold a doctorate in law, while Wu has previously served as a prosecutor. Even with such prestigious legal backgrounds, they are willing to play with the law and ignore the constitutional order merely to obtain political power.
Even though the opposition coalition holds a legislative majority, the results of the presidential election granted executive power to the Democratic Progressive Party. The KMT-TPP coalition hopes to use their majority to prevent President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration from promoting policies beneficial to Taiwan, thereby paralyzing further progress.
However, our constitutional system is not so easily harmed. Legislative powers cannot undermine executive powers, nor can they compromise the Constitution or the nation. Taking that step would inflict irreversible damage from which our country might never recover.
If even our legislators say that we need not comply with the constitutional system, why should the public even bother to follow national law? This ideology would lead to chaos — the true intention of the KMT-TPP coalition.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
As the war in Burma stretches into its 76th year, China continues to play both sides. Beijing backs the junta, which seized power in the 2021 coup, while also funding some of the resistance groups fighting the regime. Some suggest that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is hedging his bets, positioning China to side with the victors regardless of the outcome. However, a more accurate explanation is that China is acting pragmatically to safeguard its investments and ensure the steady flow of natural resources and energy for its economy. China’s primary interest is stability and supporting the junta initially seemed like the best
RSS