Journalism truths
On Sunday, the Taipei Times published an article on the front page (“Killings of journalists surge in 2022 and 2023, UNESCO says,” Nov. 3, page 1) citing a UNESCO report stating that 162 journalists were killed globally (a journalist every four days), and that Latin America and the Caribbean were the deadliest at 61. I found this odd in the current climate especially as that was followed up by an article on Monday titled “Tehran holding American journalist, US says,” (Nov. 4, page 1). Both articles were on the front page.
Considering the number of journalists that Israel has killed, often targeted killings, and the intentional omission of this, it does appear as an attempt to whitewash or generate manufactured consent in the media.
You did not choose to publish this on the front page by accident.
You chose not to mention once that international journalists are not allowed into Gaza, and not only in that article, but ever. I cannot find a single mention.
You chose not to mention once the number of journalists killed in Gaza and there is only one article about Lebanon.
The heading of the report you cited in your “killings of journalists” article is actually called “85% of journalist killings remain unpunished worldwide” and you have just created the impunity needed to increase that percentage with your selective front-page publishing.
At least 146 journalists have been killed in Gaza.
Gaza is not even the size of Taipei, and the number is more than double the number who were killed in the “worst area” in the report you cited. That area (Latin America and the Caribbean) covers 2.7 million square kilometers. That amounts to one journalist killed for every 45,000km2. Taiwan has a total area of 36,000km2. So not even one journalist for all of the area of Taiwan.
In Gaza, it is one journalist killed for every 2km2.
If those murdered journalists were equally spread out and you walked for an hour, you would walk past at least two. Crimes Against Journalists has that number at 183.
At least 17 journalists that we know of are currently detained by Israel. The environments in which they are detained are well-known.
I am no fan of the Iranian regime, but having a front-page article about one journalist and intentionally ignoring at least 17 Palestinian journalists either shows clear racist bias, or again, a willingness by your editorial team to whitewash or manufacture consent.
During the Holocaust, which is and remains a massive blotch on humanity, Streicher’s publication Der Sturmer knew what they were doing. During the Rwanda genocide, Mille Collines and Kangura knew what they were doing. These publications manufactured consent.
The Western media know exactly what it is doing. You intentionally published two articles about journalists on your front page with no mention at any point anywhere in any edition about the Gazan journalists to detract attention from what Israel is doing in Gaza and Lebanon, and to me, that means you have moved away from ethical journalism.
Gerhard Erasmus
New Taipei City
Recently, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) hastily pushed amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) through the Legislative Yuan, sparking widespread public concern. The legislative process was marked by opaque decisionmaking and expedited proceedings, raising alarms about its potential impact on the economy, national defense, and international standing. Those amendments prioritize short-term political gains at the expense of long-term national security and development. The amendments mandate that the central government transfer about NT$375.3 billion (US$11.47 billion) annually to local governments. While ostensibly aimed at enhancing local development, the lack
Having enjoyed contributing regular essays to the Liberty Times and Taipei Times now for several years, I feel it is time to pull back. As some of my readers know, I have enjoyed a decades-long relationship with Taiwan. My most recent visit was just a few months ago, when I was invited to deliver a keynote speech at a major conference in Taipei. Unfortunately, my trip intersected with Double Ten celebrations, so I missed the opportunity to call on friends in government, as well as colleagues in the new AIT building, that replaced the old Xin-yi Road complex. I have
Former US president Jimmy Carter’s legacy regarding Taiwan is a complex tapestry woven with decisions that, while controversial, were instrumental in shaping the nation’s path and its enduring relationship with the US. As the world reflects on Carter’s life and his recent passing at the age of 100, his presidency marked a transformative era in Taiwan-US-China relations, particularly through the landmark decision in 1978 to formally recognize the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the sole legal government of China, effectively derecognizing the Republic of China (ROC) based in Taiwan. That decision continues to influence geopolitical dynamics and Taiwan’s unique
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) — who once endured the hardship of living under an authoritarian political system and arduously led a quiet revolution — once said: “Democratic issues must be solved with democratic means.” Today, as Taiwanese are faced with the malicious subversion of our country’s democratic constitutional order, we must not panic. Rather, we should start by taking democratic action to rescue the Constitutional Court. As Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) leads the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) in strangling Taiwan’s judiciary and depriving individuals of the right to recall and development, Taiwanese
RSS