Journalism truths
On Sunday, the Taipei Times published an article on the front page (“Killings of journalists surge in 2022 and 2023, UNESCO says,” Nov. 3, page 1) citing a UNESCO report stating that 162 journalists were killed globally (a journalist every four days), and that Latin America and the Caribbean were the deadliest at 61. I found this odd in the current climate especially as that was followed up by an article on Monday titled “Tehran holding American journalist, US says,” (Nov. 4, page 1). Both articles were on the front page.
Considering the number of journalists that Israel has killed, often targeted killings, and the intentional omission of this, it does appear as an attempt to whitewash or generate manufactured consent in the media.
You did not choose to publish this on the front page by accident.
You chose not to mention once that international journalists are not allowed into Gaza, and not only in that article, but ever. I cannot find a single mention.
You chose not to mention once the number of journalists killed in Gaza and there is only one article about Lebanon.
The heading of the report you cited in your “killings of journalists” article is actually called “85% of journalist killings remain unpunished worldwide” and you have just created the impunity needed to increase that percentage with your selective front-page publishing.
At least 146 journalists have been killed in Gaza.
Gaza is not even the size of Taipei, and the number is more than double the number who were killed in the “worst area” in the report you cited. That area (Latin America and the Caribbean) covers 2.7 million square kilometers. That amounts to one journalist killed for every 45,000km2. Taiwan has a total area of 36,000km2. So not even one journalist for all of the area of Taiwan.
In Gaza, it is one journalist killed for every 2km2.
If those murdered journalists were equally spread out and you walked for an hour, you would walk past at least two. Crimes Against Journalists has that number at 183.
At least 17 journalists that we know of are currently detained by Israel. The environments in which they are detained are well-known.
I am no fan of the Iranian regime, but having a front-page article about one journalist and intentionally ignoring at least 17 Palestinian journalists either shows clear racist bias, or again, a willingness by your editorial team to whitewash or manufacture consent.
During the Holocaust, which is and remains a massive blotch on humanity, Streicher’s publication Der Sturmer knew what they were doing. During the Rwanda genocide, Mille Collines and Kangura knew what they were doing. These publications manufactured consent.
The Western media know exactly what it is doing. You intentionally published two articles about journalists on your front page with no mention at any point anywhere in any edition about the Gazan journalists to detract attention from what Israel is doing in Gaza and Lebanon, and to me, that means you have moved away from ethical journalism.
Gerhard Erasmus
New Taipei City
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS