Journalism truths
On Sunday, the Taipei Times published an article on the front page (“Killings of journalists surge in 2022 and 2023, UNESCO says,” Nov. 3, page 1) citing a UNESCO report stating that 162 journalists were killed globally (a journalist every four days), and that Latin America and the Caribbean were the deadliest at 61. I found this odd in the current climate especially as that was followed up by an article on Monday titled “Tehran holding American journalist, US says,” (Nov. 4, page 1). Both articles were on the front page.
Considering the number of journalists that Israel has killed, often targeted killings, and the intentional omission of this, it does appear as an attempt to whitewash or generate manufactured consent in the media.
You did not choose to publish this on the front page by accident.
You chose not to mention once that international journalists are not allowed into Gaza, and not only in that article, but ever. I cannot find a single mention.
You chose not to mention once the number of journalists killed in Gaza and there is only one article about Lebanon.
The heading of the report you cited in your “killings of journalists” article is actually called “85% of journalist killings remain unpunished worldwide” and you have just created the impunity needed to increase that percentage with your selective front-page publishing.
At least 146 journalists have been killed in Gaza.
Gaza is not even the size of Taipei, and the number is more than double the number who were killed in the “worst area” in the report you cited. That area (Latin America and the Caribbean) covers 2.7 million square kilometers. That amounts to one journalist killed for every 45,000km2. Taiwan has a total area of 36,000km2. So not even one journalist for all of the area of Taiwan.
In Gaza, it is one journalist killed for every 2km2.
If those murdered journalists were equally spread out and you walked for an hour, you would walk past at least two. Crimes Against Journalists has that number at 183.
At least 17 journalists that we know of are currently detained by Israel. The environments in which they are detained are well-known.
I am no fan of the Iranian regime, but having a front-page article about one journalist and intentionally ignoring at least 17 Palestinian journalists either shows clear racist bias, or again, a willingness by your editorial team to whitewash or manufacture consent.
During the Holocaust, which is and remains a massive blotch on humanity, Streicher’s publication Der Sturmer knew what they were doing. During the Rwanda genocide, Mille Collines and Kangura knew what they were doing. These publications manufactured consent.
The Western media know exactly what it is doing. You intentionally published two articles about journalists on your front page with no mention at any point anywhere in any edition about the Gazan journalists to detract attention from what Israel is doing in Gaza and Lebanon, and to me, that means you have moved away from ethical journalism.
Gerhard Erasmus
New Taipei City
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS