Journalism truths
On Sunday, the Taipei Times published an article on the front page (“Killings of journalists surge in 2022 and 2023, UNESCO says,” Nov. 3, page 1) citing a UNESCO report stating that 162 journalists were killed globally (a journalist every four days), and that Latin America and the Caribbean were the deadliest at 61. I found this odd in the current climate especially as that was followed up by an article on Monday titled “Tehran holding American journalist, US says,” (Nov. 4, page 1). Both articles were on the front page.
Considering the number of journalists that Israel has killed, often targeted killings, and the intentional omission of this, it does appear as an attempt to whitewash or generate manufactured consent in the media.
You did not choose to publish this on the front page by accident.
You chose not to mention once that international journalists are not allowed into Gaza, and not only in that article, but ever. I cannot find a single mention.
You chose not to mention once the number of journalists killed in Gaza and there is only one article about Lebanon.
The heading of the report you cited in your “killings of journalists” article is actually called “85% of journalist killings remain unpunished worldwide” and you have just created the impunity needed to increase that percentage with your selective front-page publishing.
At least 146 journalists have been killed in Gaza.
Gaza is not even the size of Taipei, and the number is more than double the number who were killed in the “worst area” in the report you cited. That area (Latin America and the Caribbean) covers 2.7 million square kilometers. That amounts to one journalist killed for every 45,000km2. Taiwan has a total area of 36,000km2. So not even one journalist for all of the area of Taiwan.
In Gaza, it is one journalist killed for every 2km2.
If those murdered journalists were equally spread out and you walked for an hour, you would walk past at least two. Crimes Against Journalists has that number at 183.
At least 17 journalists that we know of are currently detained by Israel. The environments in which they are detained are well-known.
I am no fan of the Iranian regime, but having a front-page article about one journalist and intentionally ignoring at least 17 Palestinian journalists either shows clear racist bias, or again, a willingness by your editorial team to whitewash or manufacture consent.
During the Holocaust, which is and remains a massive blotch on humanity, Streicher’s publication Der Sturmer knew what they were doing. During the Rwanda genocide, Mille Collines and Kangura knew what they were doing. These publications manufactured consent.
The Western media know exactly what it is doing. You intentionally published two articles about journalists on your front page with no mention at any point anywhere in any edition about the Gazan journalists to detract attention from what Israel is doing in Gaza and Lebanon, and to me, that means you have moved away from ethical journalism.
Gerhard Erasmus
New Taipei City
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS