The foundation of the US began with the Revolutionary War against Britain — which took place from 1775 to 1783 — while the origin of its democratic development began in 1787 at the Constitutional Convention, held in Philadelphia. The convention, which began in May and concluded in September of that year, resulted in the drafting of the US constitution, which was submitted to the states for approval. The founding fathers of the US — including George Washington and Benjamin Franklin — all participated in the drafting.
When faced with national distress, citizens of many imperial, transitioning and emerging countries around the world often respond by emigrating to the US. Even worse, ruling families and wealthy elites of many autocratic and dictatorial regimes frequently take refuge in the US rather than actively working to improve the living conditions in their own countries — some even become accomplices to the oppressors. During Taiwan’s martial law period, privileged circles within the ruling party and the military were inundated with this kind of opportunistic behavior.
These people fail to earnestly work toward building the political conditions for democracy, yet crave the democratic conditions of other countries. Many countries around the world are trapped in similar situations, which reflects the cultural nature of democracy — the significance behind its form and observance.
The US’ three branches of government — executive, legislative and judicial — in addition to the interactive relationship between the federal and state governments shape the effective operation of its power structure. What makes the US the US is that — despite political conflict and the chaos caused by frequent changes in the US presidency and Congress that reflect the diversity of different groups and the conflicts of ideologies and interest — its democracy continues to develop and progress.
Taiwan, which still goes by the name Republic of China, faced the reality that its territorial scope, which was once the entirety of China, was replaced by the establishment of the People’s Republic of China in 1949. It became an incomplete state, made up of the surviving remnants of China left within its borders.
While martial law was lifted in 1987, the development of the road to democratization has been anything but smooth. A direct presidential election was held in 1996, marking Taiwan’s first significant step toward becoming a nation that exists for those living within it. However, an effort remains to break free from the situation of being a mere construct, a remnant, or an “other,” influenced or hindered by Chinese ideology.
Democratization has granted those living in Taiwan rights and responsibilities. Taiwan’s national dilemmas and the struggles of democratic development are issues that all Taiwanese with a democratic vision must face. Regardless of which candidate won the US presidential election this week, it is more pertinent for Taiwan that Taiwanese recognize the need to be self-reliant and pay closer attention to their own democratic development.
The development of democracy in the US has not been perfect, and yet it still attracts people from all over the world. Many from Taiwan and China run from their national responsibilities or leave to pursue the American dream.
Taiwan’s democratization must be cherished — only then can people living in Taiwan have the dignity of subjectivity. It cannot merely be about money. A country is the cultural imagination of community and a political structure — each citizen is the master of their own nation.
The development of Taiwan’s democracy is the right and responsibility of all Taiwanese citizens.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
Cosmetics have long been one of the “golden pillars” of revenue for department stores in Taiwan. With rows of beauty counters and a full lineup of brands, they once served as a powerful draw for customers. However, since last year, the halo surrounding the sector has begun to fade. It is not an isolated issue affecting one retailer — it is a widespread phenomenon across department stores in Taiwan. Department store executives admit that business is tough, but they also stress that the root cause is not a drop in Taiwan’s spending power or a surge in outbound travel. Instead, a
RSS