The foundation of the US began with the Revolutionary War against Britain — which took place from 1775 to 1783 — while the origin of its democratic development began in 1787 at the Constitutional Convention, held in Philadelphia. The convention, which began in May and concluded in September of that year, resulted in the drafting of the US constitution, which was submitted to the states for approval. The founding fathers of the US — including George Washington and Benjamin Franklin — all participated in the drafting.
When faced with national distress, citizens of many imperial, transitioning and emerging countries around the world often respond by emigrating to the US. Even worse, ruling families and wealthy elites of many autocratic and dictatorial regimes frequently take refuge in the US rather than actively working to improve the living conditions in their own countries — some even become accomplices to the oppressors. During Taiwan’s martial law period, privileged circles within the ruling party and the military were inundated with this kind of opportunistic behavior.
These people fail to earnestly work toward building the political conditions for democracy, yet crave the democratic conditions of other countries. Many countries around the world are trapped in similar situations, which reflects the cultural nature of democracy — the significance behind its form and observance.
The US’ three branches of government — executive, legislative and judicial — in addition to the interactive relationship between the federal and state governments shape the effective operation of its power structure. What makes the US the US is that — despite political conflict and the chaos caused by frequent changes in the US presidency and Congress that reflect the diversity of different groups and the conflicts of ideologies and interest — its democracy continues to develop and progress.
Taiwan, which still goes by the name Republic of China, faced the reality that its territorial scope, which was once the entirety of China, was replaced by the establishment of the People’s Republic of China in 1949. It became an incomplete state, made up of the surviving remnants of China left within its borders.
While martial law was lifted in 1987, the development of the road to democratization has been anything but smooth. A direct presidential election was held in 1996, marking Taiwan’s first significant step toward becoming a nation that exists for those living within it. However, an effort remains to break free from the situation of being a mere construct, a remnant, or an “other,” influenced or hindered by Chinese ideology.
Democratization has granted those living in Taiwan rights and responsibilities. Taiwan’s national dilemmas and the struggles of democratic development are issues that all Taiwanese with a democratic vision must face. Regardless of which candidate won the US presidential election this week, it is more pertinent for Taiwan that Taiwanese recognize the need to be self-reliant and pay closer attention to their own democratic development.
The development of democracy in the US has not been perfect, and yet it still attracts people from all over the world. Many from Taiwan and China run from their national responsibilities or leave to pursue the American dream.
Taiwan’s democratization must be cherished — only then can people living in Taiwan have the dignity of subjectivity. It cannot merely be about money. A country is the cultural imagination of community and a political structure — each citizen is the master of their own nation.
The development of Taiwan’s democracy is the right and responsibility of all Taiwanese citizens.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
Historically, in Taiwan, and in present-day China, many people advocate the idea of a “great Chinese nation.” It is not worth arguing with extremists to say that the so-called “great Chinese nation” is a fabricated political myth rather than an academic term. Rather, they should read the following excerpt from Chinese writer Lin Yutang’s (林語堂) book My Country and My People: “It is also inevitable that I should offend many writers about China, especially my own countrymen and great patriots. These great patriots — I have nothing to do with them, for their god is not my god, and their patriotism is
RSS