China Unification Promotion Party central committee member Chang Meng-chung (張孟崇) and his wife were indicted on Monday on charges of accepting NT$74 million (US$2.3 million) from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to interfere in Taiwan’s elections and to induce members of the military to surrender should China invade Taiwan.
Judicial investigators in Chiayi said the couple had received the money, directly and indirectly, from China’s Taiwan Affairs Office in Beijing and its branch office in China’s Fujian Province to broadcast pro-Beijing propaganda on digital platforms in Taiwan to interfere with the nation’s elections, disparage Hong Kong democracy activists, boast about China’s military power and urge troops to surrender in the event of a Chinese invasion.
It is not news that China has long tried to recruit Taiwanese to act as propaganda mouthpieces and spies to access confidential information. This case has further demonstrated the “megabucks” that China would spend, which reportedly flowed through third countries or areas, including Hong Kong and the US, to sway Taiwanese public opinion and to lure Taiwanese for espionage.
Experts said that if Chinese intelligence units could spend NT$74 million to buy off a pro-China person like Chang, much more financial incentives could be or have been spread from the Chinese central and local governments’ “united front” funds to influential dignitaries and opinion leaders.
According to the National Security Bureau, from last year to August this year, it had investigated at least 87 cases involving national security violations, mostly election interference and the leaking of crucial confidential information, of which 42 cases had resulted in indictments. That represented a significant increase from the average of five to 10 cases under investigation per year from 2013 to 2022.
It should be more alarming that, succumbing to China’s financial temptations, the number of military officers lured as spies to serve Beijing’s cause of taking over Taiwan has notably increased. A report by the Control Yuan showed that from 2011 to last year, 40 spy cases involving 113 military and civilian personnel had been uncovered by the Ministry of National Defense’s intelligence units. That marked a significant increase from only 13 spy cases involving nine military and civilian personnel from 2001 to 2010.
Those cases serve as a crucial warning: The perpetrators lured by China used to be mostly retired officers, but recently involved more active-duty soldiers, especially those in financial difficulties. For example, in September, Tainan prosecutors indicted 23 people on charges of spying for China, including eight active military officers who were in debt and were wooed by a Chinese spy ring through pawnshops and online loan companies.
Aside from providing confidential information and developing spy rings, China has also requested those officers show loyalty to the CCP and vow to surrender to the Chinese military if it invaded Taiwan.
The Control Yuan’s report further highlighted that since COVID-19 pandemic, the CCP’s intelligence units have explored various tactics to recruit Taiwanese military personnel, including the use of online mediums such as mobile games, with the number of such incidents reaching a staggering 1,706 in about two years. Some cases even showed that cryptocurrency was extensively used to bribe young soldiers.
The upgrade of “money talks” spy recruitment tactics has escalated Chinese espionage and imposed greater challenges for Taiwanese authorities to detect and counter Chinese infiltration.
The government should speed up the strengthening of counterintelligence forces, and boost the morale of the army and public in resisting the devil’s temptation.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
RSS