Proposed court rules flawed
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲) has proposed amendments to the Constitutional Court Procedure Act (憲法訴訟法) that would require a two-thirds majority of judges to pass a constitutional interpretation, an increase from the current simple majority.
Another proposed amendment would change the court’s quorum from two-thirds of presently incumbent justices to two-thirds of the full court.
Her proposed amendments also specify that the “total number of incumbent justices” mentioned in the act means “15” — the full number of seats on the court.
To begin, it is necessary to distinguish between the two amendments.
First is the approval threshold. Each item in a Constitutional Court ruling must be voted on by the court justices.
The current law requires approval from a simple majority to pass a ruling. Weng’s amendment would increase that threshold to require agreement from two-thirds of the justices on the quorum.
Second is the base number of justices required to calculate the approval threshold. Under the existing law, the approval threshold — a simple majority — is calculated based on the number of justices present and participating in the deliberation.
However, Weng’s amendment would require that the approval threshold — which she has proposed to be two-thirds — would be based on a quorum of 15 incumbent justices. In other words, approval from 10 justices would be required to pass a ruling.
The KMT’s proposal to amend the law and raise the approval threshold is a matter open for discussion. However, the number of incumbent justices should not be explicitly set at 15.
To avoid politicizing the recent issue of potential vacancies on the Constitutional Court, it is necessary to consider a neutral example.
Suppose six justices must recuse themselves from a specific case, and only nine justices remain for deliberation. With the two-thirds approval threshold proposed by Weng — while keeping the existing definition of the base number of justices — the ruling would require approval from at least six justices to pass. This raises a problem with the amendment, but still leaves room for discussion.
However — in keeping with the above example — if the number of incumbent justices is redefined to be 15, then the two-thirds threshold would require approval from a minimum of 10 justices.
However, the issue would be that there are only nine justices on the quorum.
So, under Weng’s amendments, this situation would render it impossible to pass a ruling.
This raises significant doubts as to whether the protection of citizens’ rights to seek litigation would be undermined, or their constitutional right to seek judicial remedies hindered.
Furthermore, if only five justices recuse themselves from deliberation of a case, then unanimous agreement from the participating 10 judges would be required to issue a ruling.
This situation leads to the conclusion that a constitutional ruling would require a complete consensus of the justices.
Is this an acceptable outcome?
I fear it could become a global spectacle.
In other words, redefining the base number of incumbent justices to 15 means that the approval threshold would constantly change depending on the number of justices present for different cases.
This could lead to situations where unanimous approval is necessary, or where no ruling could be made at all.
This would ultimately undermine the credibility of the Constitutional Court and contradict the amendment’s original intent.
It could even go so far as to inhibit normal judicial function.
Therefore, the current provision defining the base number of incumbent justices should not be changed.
You Chieh-han
Taipei
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
RSS