Some politicians are not sure whether they are coming or going on the issue of Taiwan’s electricity development. They need to stay abreast of developments.
When the Ministry of Economic Affairs said the electricity supply was sufficient, these politicians said it would not be adequate in the future.
When the ministry proposed to import green electricity from the Philippines, they questioned the feasibility of the plan.
When experts said it would be feasible to import green electricity from the Philippines, these same politicians said it would be too costly.
When some international enterprises showed their willingness to purchase green electricity, they said the supply would be insufficient.
The fact is that Taiwan has an adequate electricity supply. If we could increase the supply of green electricity, it would attract foreign investment, too.
During an interpellation session at the Legislative Yuan, a lawmaker questioned whether Taiwan could supply 10 gigawatt-hours of green energy for Nvidia’s potential expansion in the country.
Taiwan produces 20 gigawatt-hours of green electricity per year, possibly reaching 55 gigawatt-hours in 2026, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said.
It is possible to meet Nvidia’s demand, as Nvidia is not requesting a large amount of green energy, he said.
Taiwan is not short of electricity, and yet opposition parties are telling everyone that the nation faces an electricity shortage.
For international enterprises, using green energy is part of their commitment to sustainable development.
Many multinational corporations promote using renewable energy to reduce their carbon emissions and fulfill their obligations to the environment.
Therefore, if Taiwan raised its green energy ratio, it would have a better chance of attracting high-tech and high-value-added industries.
Although green energy is costly, some enterprises are able and willing to pay more. Not only could this alleviate the financial burden on the public in terms of electricity charges, but it could also create room for raising the green energy ratio, leading to a multi-win situation.
Some politicians might not thoroughly understand energy policy, or simply oppose green energy for the sake of opposition, overlooking the fact that they make contradicting statements.
On the one hand, they propose raising the green energy ratio. On the other hand, they oppose green energy because of the potential increase in electricity prices. This is tantamount to wanting to have your cake and eat it too.
These politicians even exaggerate Taiwan’s green energy shortage to mislead international investors, when in fact, Taiwan has a long-term plan for energy development.
There is no risk of electricity shortage. Taiwan needs high-tech corporations, such as Nvidia, rather than labor-intensive industries that bring serious pollution.
Green energy availability is important for multinational corporations when weighing up their investment decisions.
International enterprises would be glad to see Taiwan importing green energy from the Philippines, and would be willing to pay more for it.
The nation cannot ignore industrial transition and developing more green energy if it wants to attract foreign investment. Politicians should support green energy development to create an attractive investment environment and a greener, more sustainable economy.
Wang Chih-chien is a distinguished professor at National Taipei University’s Graduate Institute of Information Management.
Translated by Fion Khan
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS