Negotiation, not supervision
After reading Hsu Yu-min’s letter about parents’ rights to supervise their children (Letters, Oct. 28, page 8), I, as an assistant professor who needs to guide students with their learning activities, have a different take on the issue.
There is certainly a new conflict of interests between parents and their children. Parents pay for their children’s tuition and would be informed of their academic performance. However, students would like to gain full autonomy and freedom without having to report to their parents because they have been granted full citizenship over the age of 18. Both parents and children must take full responsibility.
Parents do not have to take control of their children’s performance by demanding to look at their academic reports. They have to respect their children’s right to privacy. Thus, I recommend that parents learn to control their emotions to improve their communications skills so that their children would have more willingness to discuss matters related to their studies if needed. Second, parents must use efficient negotiation skills to help their children solve any problems related to the payment of their education and other administrative matters.
When children agree to enter university, they should take full responsibility to go to class regularly, complete their assignments on time and fulfill their promise to graduate. Children should communicate with their parents when they ask reasonable questions regarding their studies. As parents have invested a large sum of money for their children’s study, it is the parents’ rights to ask questions to be informed about their children’s schooling situation. Nevertheless, children should provide a reasonable excuse if they do not want to provide information to their parents.
Thus, the job of parenting is not an easy one as their children have gained awareness about their rights. There is no discussion needed when everything goes smoothly. Parents and children only need serious discussions when problems crop up. It is thus imperative that both parents and children develop good communication skills to solve problems efficiently. That way, children would agree to provide relevant information to their parents regarding their academic performance.
David Blasco
New Taipei City
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS