The effectiveness of transits through the Taiwan Strait by foreign navies could be bolstered if those vessels made ports of call in Taiwan.
French Navy frigate Prairial entered the Taiwan Strait on Monday night and sailed in a northerly direction, the Ministry of National Defense said on Tuesday. Chang Ching (張競), a retired captain in Taiwan’s navy, told RW News that the Prairial had been docked in Cebu as part of its operational deployment in the Indo-Pacific region. That transit comes on the heels of one by the US Navy destroyer USS Higgins and the Canadian navy frigate HMCS Vancouver on Oct. 20, and one by German navy frigate FGS Baden-Wurttemberg and logistics ship FGS Frankfurt am Main on Sept. 13 — Germany’s first transit of the strait in 20 years.
The Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force also set a precedent on Sept. 25 when naval destroyer JS Sazanami sailed the strait accompanied by naval ships from Australia and New Zealand. That transit marked a “big step away from [Japan’s] long-held policy of not directly challenging China,” the BBC reported.
The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs in 2022 claimed that the waters of the Taiwan Strait “are China’s internal waters, territorial sea, contiguous zone and exclusive economic zone in that order.” Clearly, that is incorrect according to international law.
“Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea [UNCLOS], to which China is a party, China enjoys a 12 nautical mile territorial sea off of its coasts,” Forbes wrote on June 28, 2022.
“Regardless of the status of Taiwan as a country, the Taiwan Strait still contains a corridor of international waters and airspace beyond the territorial sea of any state,” it wrote.
Many nations are now demonstrating that they are keen to uphold the rules laid out in UNCLOS, and that they would not sit idly while China flouts international norms and order. It has been expressed on numerous occasions that a Chinese attack on Taiwan would have disastrous consequences for the global economy. Probably in part because of that risk, more countries are expressing support for Taiwan. This has manifested most recently with the EU resolution condemning China’s interpretation of UN Resolution 2758.
For some countries, supporting Taiwan has been an expression of support for democracy in general, in the face of what they see as the growing threat of authoritarianism. Regardless of their motivations in supporting Taiwan, democracies would not want to see China exercise control over the Taiwan Strait, which would disrupt shipping, and embolden China to push boundaries and expand further.
Transits through the strait are a good way for countries to demonstrate to Beijing their commitment to protecting international rule of law. However, the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) censorship of news media in China gives it the opportunity to present transits in the way it wants to its own public. The CCP would likely present the false narrative that it expelled the foreign vessels from the strait, or that the transits were possible only after the CCP sanctioned them following application by the foreign navy.
If foreign vessels were to make ports of call at Kaohsiung, it would be much harder for the CCP to spin that into a favorable narrative. Such calls would also afford the opportunity for foreign vessels to resupply, and would enable meetings with Taiwanese officials.
China could hardly object to port calls in Taiwan since it suspended US calls to Hong Kong in 2019. Former Maritime and Port Bureau deputy director-general Lee Yun-wan (李雲萬) has said that four ports in Taiwan could handle calls by US destroyers, and Kaohsiung could handle aircraft carriers. The government should communicate with Washington and other governments about the possibility of port calls in Taiwan.
Transits through the Taiwan Strait send a message to China that other countries would not tolerate violations of international law and order. Making ports of call in Taiwan would further convey to Beijing that Taiwan would not be left to face Chinese aggression alone.
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
There appears to be a growing view among leaders and leading thinkers in Taiwan that their words and actions have no influence over how China approaches cross-Strait relations. According to this logic, China’s actions toward Taiwan are guided by China’s unwavering ambition to assert control over Taiwan. Many also believe Beijing’s approach is influenced by China’s domestic politics. As the thinking goes, former President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) made a good faith effort to demonstrate her moderation on cross-Strait issues throughout her tenure. During her 2016 inaugural address, Tsai sent several constructive signals, including by acknowledging the historical fact of interactions and
HSBC Holdings successfully fought off a breakup campaign by disgruntled Asian investors in recent years. Now, it has announced a restructuring along almost the same east-west lines. The obvious question is why? It says it is designed to create a simpler, more efficient and dynamic company. However, it looks a lot like the bank is also facing up to the political reality of the growing schism between the US and China. A new structure would not dissolve HSBC’s geopolitical challenges, but it could give the bank better options to respond quickly if things worsen. HSBC spent 2022 battling to convince shareholders of
China’s “Joint Sword-2024B” military exercises around Taiwan last week have sparked concerns in Taipei and allied capitals that Beijing’s risk tolerance is increasing, and rather than prioritizing efforts toward “peaceful unification,” it is ramping up efforts to bring about unification by force, whether that be a military quarantine, blockade or full-scale invasion. Catherine Lila Chou (周怡齡) and Mark Harrison are right in their recent book Revolutionary Taiwan: Making Nationhood in a Changing World Order that the nature of Beijing’s one-party political system, in which the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is always right, means Taiwanese identity is explained away as being the
RSS