Germany’s ruling coalition is still in power, but the three-party alliance exists in little more than name.
Behind the scenes in Berlin, talk of a breakup before scheduled elections in September next year has become more pronounced. Some high-ranking officials have mused that the only thing that can save the so-called “traffic light coalition” is the fear factor that would result from former US president Donald Trump winning a return to the White House, according to people close to the situation, who asked not to be identified because the discussions were private.
The extent of the frayed relationship was on full display yesterday, as German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and German Minister of Finance Christian Lindner of the pro-business Free Democratic Party (FDP) hosted parallel and partly competing meetings with industry officials to explore ways to revive the country’s stagnating economy. Neither invited the other, and both shut out German Minister of Economic Affairs Robert Habeck of the Greens, who last week surprised his Cabinet colleagues with a proposal for a “Germany fund” to bolster investment.
Scholz, Habeck and Lindner have been key over the past three years to brokering compromises within the coalition, but they have lost each other’s trust to some degree and shifted focus to winning over voters rather than trying to find common ground, the people said.
The strains are not a secret. During a visit to India at the weekend, a student asked Scholz how it is to lead the three-way alliance.
The Social Democrat laughed and said: “Well, I want to be very honest with you. The coalition government which I’m leading is not the easiest in the world.”
Tensions between the parties have been rising for months as budget constraints collide with a sputtering manufacturing sector that is struggling with an economic slowdown in China, and high energy and labor costs. Europe’s largest economy, which is scheduled to release GDP data today, has likely been in recession since April.
Anxiety over living standards has fueled anti-immigrant sentiment and caused all three parties to lose support in polls compared with the last election in 2021. The FDP’s support would put it at risk of failing to make it into the lower house of parliament.
With their fortunes fading, the ruling parties have been using their platform in the government to burnish campaign profiles. Scholz caught his partners wrong-footed about two weeks ago when he surprisingly announced an “industry pact” with business leaders helmed by himself.
Habeck and Lindner were unaware, although they had pushed Scholz in the past few months to take further steps to ease the burden on businesses.
Habeck reacted to Scholz’s proposal a few days later by floating the idea of subsidizing as much as 10 percent of company investment. Lindner, a fiscal hawk, dismissed the idea as a potential violation of EU restrictions on state aid.
The FDP leader then let his parliamentary caucus schedule a meeting with small and medium-sized companies and business associations not invited to the chancellor’s summit. That meeting took place just hours before Scholz hosted union and manufacturing representatives yesterday.
“There is no lack of proposals,” said Jurgen Goldinger, chief executive officer of German ventilation specialist Maico Holding and part of a business delegation that traveled to India last week with Habeck. “It seems difficult to reach a consensus across party lines and then find a pragmatic way to make decisions.”
The partial dysfunction creates a power vacuum in Germany that threatens to ripple across Europe as the region seeks to uphold support for Ukraine’s defense against Russia, but the stakes are high for any party that pulls out of the coalition.
Although Scholz’s government is deeply unpopular, Germans value stability and the political damage for pulling out of the coalition could be severe. The FDP is seen as the weakest link, but with support hovering below the 5 percent threshold to get into the Bundestag, losing the finance ministry as a platform for the party’s fiscally prudent policies could be costly.
Aside from political tactics, more trouble is brewing for the coalition. The budget for next year must be approved by lawmakers in the German parliament in about two weeks, but there is still a shortfall of as much as 10 billion euros (US$11 billion) to close. Keeping the country’s net borrowing limit enshrined in the constitution is Lindner’s top priority and conflicts with the economic incentives sought by Habeck.
“We are now in the middle of what I call the autumn of decisions,” Lindner said last week in Washington after announcing that there was no scope for further spending and that even more consolidation was needed.
Another stumbling block could once again come from Germany’s top court, which triggered a government crisis in November last year with a decision that special off-budget funds were unconstitutional. The judges of the federal court are expected to rule this year on a levy for high earners, the so-called solidarity charge, which could potentially spark a new financing crunch for the government.
Asked whether the coalition will still celebrate Christmas together, Scholz wryly responded during his India trip: “Christmas will always be celebrated.”
Recently, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) hastily pushed amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) through the Legislative Yuan, sparking widespread public concern. The legislative process was marked by opaque decisionmaking and expedited proceedings, raising alarms about its potential impact on the economy, national defense, and international standing. Those amendments prioritize short-term political gains at the expense of long-term national security and development. The amendments mandate that the central government transfer about NT$375.3 billion (US$11.47 billion) annually to local governments. While ostensibly aimed at enhancing local development, the lack
Having enjoyed contributing regular essays to the Liberty Times and Taipei Times now for several years, I feel it is time to pull back. As some of my readers know, I have enjoyed a decades-long relationship with Taiwan. My most recent visit was just a few months ago, when I was invited to deliver a keynote speech at a major conference in Taipei. Unfortunately, my trip intersected with Double Ten celebrations, so I missed the opportunity to call on friends in government, as well as colleagues in the new AIT building, that replaced the old Xin-yi Road complex. I have
Former US president Jimmy Carter’s legacy regarding Taiwan is a complex tapestry woven with decisions that, while controversial, were instrumental in shaping the nation’s path and its enduring relationship with the US. As the world reflects on Carter’s life and his recent passing at the age of 100, his presidency marked a transformative era in Taiwan-US-China relations, particularly through the landmark decision in 1978 to formally recognize the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the sole legal government of China, effectively derecognizing the Republic of China (ROC) based in Taiwan. That decision continues to influence geopolitical dynamics and Taiwan’s unique
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) — who once endured the hardship of living under an authoritarian political system and arduously led a quiet revolution — once said: “Democratic issues must be solved with democratic means.” Today, as Taiwanese are faced with the malicious subversion of our country’s democratic constitutional order, we must not panic. Rather, we should start by taking democratic action to rescue the Constitutional Court. As Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) leads the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) in strangling Taiwan’s judiciary and depriving individuals of the right to recall and development, Taiwanese
RSS