The Japanese general election on Sunday resulted in a catastrophic defeat for Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which failed to retain its majority for the first time in 15 years.
Even with the support of its longtime coalition partner, Komeito, it still did not reach its target.
The results of this historic election shifted the political landscape of one large and several small parties that has characterized the LDP and its opposition since former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe’s victory in December 2012.
If the era of Japan’s LDP-led one-party dominant system enters a new age of decline, the start would undoubtedly be traced back to last week’s immensely significant election.
Following the LDP’s defeat at the polls, the bewildering political makeup of Tokyo’s Nagatacho, home to the National Diet, has attracted much attention. It appears that whether Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba’s administration is able to survive would depend on three important observational factors.
First is whether the administration can withstand internal fissures. The primary reason for the LDP’s loss is the public’s long-standing disdain for its mixture of politics and money. Although the Ishiba-led LDP must broadly bear responsibility for the election outcome, it was not his fault alone.
Ishiba has never been a part of the party’s mainstream faction, and whether the only remaining bloc — that of former Japanese prime minister Taro Aso — and the forces supporting former Japanese defense minister Sanae Takaichi force Ishiba to step down merits careful attention.
Second is how Ishiba will fare in the prime ministerial nomination election to be held during an extraordinary Diet session on Thursday next week.
Negotiations with the opposition are crucial to either form a coalition government or establish a successful, issue-based policy negotiation mechanism.
The LDP, which holds 191 seats, has already extended an olive branch to the Democratic Party for the People (DPP), which with 28 seats is considered the pivotal minority party.
However, DPP leader Yichiro Tamaki has yet to respond, only exhibiting a posture that indicates he is open for negotiation with parties. The remaining trump card for the LDP would likely be to relinquish the prime minister’s position.
Last, the LDP is not the only party with the vision of establishing a coalition government. The largest winner on Sunday and the LDP’s largest opposition, the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan (CDPJ), with 148 seats, is also eager to take action.
In addition to its affiliate, the DPP, the CDPJ has also invited the third-largest party, the Japan Innovation Party, which has 38 seats, and other small opposition parties to form a coalition government to overthrow the LDP-Komeito alliance. They hope to reproduce the events of 1993, when eight opposition parties worked together to challenge and defeat the LDP.
With the prime ministerial election just a week away, it is unlikely that the Aso faction and other forces within the LDP looking to oust Ishida would unite. Thus, the main stage of forming a coalition would become a tug of war between the LDP and the CDPJ.
In the coming week and beyond, Nagatacho would be filled with a chaotic atmosphere; it will surely be something to see.
John Lim is a project researcher at the University of Tokyo’s Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS