The Examination Yuan plans to revise the national examination rules by removing some physical examination requirements, for example the ones regarding height or tattoos of police force applicants, to bring it “in line with the times.” When the plans were announced, rank-and-file police expressed their frustration, saying that if there were no restrictions on height or tattoos, there could be police officers under 150cm or 140cm, or who have tattoos of dragons and phoenixes, looking like gangsters.
While police enforcement and criminal investigations rely on intelligence, rather than physical attributes, physique definitely has an effect on the ability to perform on the front line.
WHAT THE JOB DEMANDS
I remember some years ago at the Taoyuan Precinct’s criminal section, we had a burly police officer, who was taller than 180cm. Whenever we launched a spot check at an entertainment venue, I would instruct him to stand at the door of each room with his arms folded and his eyes fixed on the customers. We would not hear a single complaint from anyone, not even from those with a few drinks in them.
Previously, highway police were required to be of a height of 170cm or taller. At that time, a squad was responsible for about 100km section of the provincial highway, so it would often be the case that a police officer was on duty alone in the remote areas. It would not be suitable for a person of slight build to be out there on their own. The port police also must deal with big and tall foreign sailors. Members of the military’s honor guard need to look imposing to make the right impression.
POLICE OR GANGSTER?
The police are there to enforce the law. How ridiculous would it be if they have tattoos on their arms, necks or, heaven forbid, faces? If an Examination Yuan member had a dispute with someone and went to a police station, only to see that the police officer handling the case had a duck tattooed on one side of his neck and a leopard on the other — the pronunciation of duck and leopard together can be the metaphor for yaba (鴨霸), meaning “bully” — who could say that officer had not once belonged to a gang? If the officer had his arms tattooed with characters like “love, hate, affection and enmity” (愛恨情仇), would he not wonder what trauma the officer had before, and whether he was mentally healthy or capable of solving problems?
In Taiwan, the use of guns by the police is controlled in many ways. To stop a street incident, police officers usually rely on their physical strength. Can a police officer with a slight build and short of stature be expected to get involved in this kind of situation? A significant percentage of police officers are female. Would their supervisors be comfortable with them getting involved in physical altercations with criminals in the dead of night?
On the other hand, if female officers are only allowed for office duty, not field work, what does this mean for gender equality? Besides, police workforce is already insufficient. In the face of large events or major incidents, when the police force could be stretched to the limit, is it still possible to divide officers into office duty and field work?
The Examination Yuan exists to solve problems, not to create them. To make such a big change in the rules, why does it not first try to understand the grassroots police units? It is merely making the change behind closed doors under the wrong-headed impression that these changes are somehow progressive.
Teddy Su is a civil servant.
Translated by Eddy Chang
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) said “know yourself and know your enemy and you will win a hundred battles.” Applied in our times, Taiwanese should know themselves and know the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) so that Taiwan will win a hundred battles and hopefully, deter the CCP. Taiwanese receive information daily about the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) threat from the Ministry of National Defense and news sources. One area that needs better understanding is which forces would the People’s Republic of China (PRC) use to impose martial law and what would be the consequences for living under PRC
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
Beijing’s approval of a controversial mega-dam in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo River — which flows from Tibet — has ignited widespread debate over its strategic and environmental implications. The project exacerbates the complexities of India-China relations, and underscores Beijing’s push for hydropower dominance and potential weaponization of water against India. India and China are caught in a protracted territorial dispute along the Line of Actual Control. The approval of a dam on a transboundary river adds another layer to an already strained bilateral relationship, making dialogue and trust-building even more challenging, especially given that the two Asian
RSS