The government’s efforts to encourage households and institutional investors to return their massive financial assets parked abroad have made little progress over the past several years. Taiwanese have about NT$20 trillion (US$623.2 billion) in assets, but most of that money is tied up in overseas bonds, foreign equities or other types of international investment instruments, the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) said. However, expectations are growing among those in the local financial industry that a significant change in the situation is coming, albeit slowly and despite persistent geopolitical risks.
The source of that optimism is a new FSC policy plan that aims to develop Taiwan into an asset management center in the region with unique characteristics, such as the nation’s strong semiconductor and manufacturing industries, and its ample household financial assets.
The new initiative appears inclined to take a more realistic approach than previous efforts by at first encouraging the domestic financial industry, local institutional investors and Taiwanese households not to move funds into foreign markets, but to invest in Taiwan. After retaining local wealth onshore, it would then work to attract more foreign funds and build up the nation’s asset management industry.
Last month, the FSC proposed five measures to achieve its asset management goal. First, the commission would establish a special financial zone within the country for asset management. Next, it would establish the Taiwanese individual savings account (TISA) scheme in the spirit of inclusive finance. The commission would also promote family office institutions for wealth management and look at capital investment in public construction to guide private capital investment. Last, it plans to guide capital investment into national strategic industries.
The FSC said it aims to achieve its policy goals through a six-year, three-stage course. It plans large-scale regulatory easing, as well as market adjustments and cross-departmental cooperation in two years. In four years, it aims to significantly increase the size of Taiwan’s asset management and market participants. It would eventually achieve the asset management center goal with Taiwanese characteristics and regional competitiveness in six years, with the hope of doubling the scale of the nation’s wealth management from about NT$30 trillion to NT$60 trillion.
Last week’s announcement by FSC Chairman Peng Jin-lung (彭金隆) that the commission would set up a special financial zone in Kaohsiung is a starting point for moving toward its larger policy goal. He said five foreign asset management firms and four domestic banks would move into the special zone in the first half of next year. In addition, the commission’s proposed TISA scheme, which is designed to provide investment options for people along with favorable fees and tax-exemption benefits, really stands out, as it could help people build up assets amid the rising cost of living and create a positive environment for the asset management industry.
Developing a regional asset management center in Taiwan was one of President William Lai’s (賴清德) major policy proposals during his election campaign last year and it is definitely the top priority of Premier Cho Jung-tai’s (卓榮泰) Cabinet. However, it is no easy job, as Taiwan is not the only place seeking a share of this big pie, with neighboring economies including Hong Kong, Singapore and Japan already doing it and moving ahead of Taiwan. The commission must make greater efforts to communicate with lawmakers, push for more reforms within the local asset management industry and improve the public’s financial literacy so that it can reach its policy goal smoothly and effectively.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS