The government’s efforts to encourage households and institutional investors to return their massive financial assets parked abroad have made little progress over the past several years. Taiwanese have about NT$20 trillion (US$623.2 billion) in assets, but most of that money is tied up in overseas bonds, foreign equities or other types of international investment instruments, the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) said. However, expectations are growing among those in the local financial industry that a significant change in the situation is coming, albeit slowly and despite persistent geopolitical risks.
The source of that optimism is a new FSC policy plan that aims to develop Taiwan into an asset management center in the region with unique characteristics, such as the nation’s strong semiconductor and manufacturing industries, and its ample household financial assets.
The new initiative appears inclined to take a more realistic approach than previous efforts by at first encouraging the domestic financial industry, local institutional investors and Taiwanese households not to move funds into foreign markets, but to invest in Taiwan. After retaining local wealth onshore, it would then work to attract more foreign funds and build up the nation’s asset management industry.
Last month, the FSC proposed five measures to achieve its asset management goal. First, the commission would establish a special financial zone within the country for asset management. Next, it would establish the Taiwanese individual savings account (TISA) scheme in the spirit of inclusive finance. The commission would also promote family office institutions for wealth management and look at capital investment in public construction to guide private capital investment. Last, it plans to guide capital investment into national strategic industries.
The FSC said it aims to achieve its policy goals through a six-year, three-stage course. It plans large-scale regulatory easing, as well as market adjustments and cross-departmental cooperation in two years. In four years, it aims to significantly increase the size of Taiwan’s asset management and market participants. It would eventually achieve the asset management center goal with Taiwanese characteristics and regional competitiveness in six years, with the hope of doubling the scale of the nation’s wealth management from about NT$30 trillion to NT$60 trillion.
Last week’s announcement by FSC Chairman Peng Jin-lung (彭金隆) that the commission would set up a special financial zone in Kaohsiung is a starting point for moving toward its larger policy goal. He said five foreign asset management firms and four domestic banks would move into the special zone in the first half of next year. In addition, the commission’s proposed TISA scheme, which is designed to provide investment options for people along with favorable fees and tax-exemption benefits, really stands out, as it could help people build up assets amid the rising cost of living and create a positive environment for the asset management industry.
Developing a regional asset management center in Taiwan was one of President William Lai’s (賴清德) major policy proposals during his election campaign last year and it is definitely the top priority of Premier Cho Jung-tai’s (卓榮泰) Cabinet. However, it is no easy job, as Taiwan is not the only place seeking a share of this big pie, with neighboring economies including Hong Kong, Singapore and Japan already doing it and moving ahead of Taiwan. The commission must make greater efforts to communicate with lawmakers, push for more reforms within the local asset management industry and improve the public’s financial literacy so that it can reach its policy goal smoothly and effectively.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS