Taiwanese men doing their alternative military service within Taipei’s and Taichung’s Department of Compulsory Military Service independently reported outlandish incidents of brainwashing. Below is a story related to propagandizing as it manifests overseas.
One of my Chinese friends and a group of Taiwanese friends set off together from Sydney, Australia, in a tour group to northern Europe.
The travel agency arranged for a Chinese tour guide to lead the group. The guide would start off on a propaganda blitz every afternoon at a set time, singing the praises of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
The Taiwanese members of the tour seemed completely unaware, but my Chinese friend commented that this was essentially the same thing as a CCP political course aimed at Chinese domestic audiences and Chinese-heavy tour groups such as theirs.
As soon as my friend looked up the guide’s identity, they were quick to see through the veil — the guide was basically a CCP member tasked with disseminating propaganda for the party.
My Chinese friend and one of the Taiwanese group members started to speak up, but the guide did not seem to understand what the issue was, adding that they would not stop with the propaganda.
Over several days, the undercurrent of discontent in the group kept simmering to the point things eventually exploded.
The tour group erupted in a shouting match and several of the Taiwanese group members just wanted to put out the flames, ultimately trying to persuade their protesting group members to “just let the guide speak,” adding that “the guide also has the right to freedom of speech.”
This attempt at placation was risible. What exactly was the level of twisted logic here?
To what extent should Taiwanese tolerate CCP political propaganda without alarm bells going off in their mind?
Is it any wonder that the CCP’s unchecked infiltration is paying massive dividends when people would rather try to smooth over any spats than turn off the torrent of misinformation?
Not long after, my friend could not stand the deluge of nonsense anymore and called the travel agency’s head office in Sydney to lodge a complaint.
The agency then called up the branch travel agency and told them that the guide’s actions were illegal, and that if they were reported to and investigated by local authorities, the travel agency would have its license suspended. After the phone call, the guide finally stopped spouting the propaganda.
In the past few years, China’s propaganda campaigns have been spreading wider and with more zeal. There is essentially no place left untouched by them.
This incident happened in free and open democracies such as Australia and those in northern Europe, but they far more frequently occur in places lacking a democratic mindset.
Taiwanese need to increase their awareness.
Whenever they encounter CCP propaganda overseas, they need to be aware of it and be willing to fight back against the messaging.
Tour guides outside China do have freedom of speech, but tourists also have the right not to be captive audiences to indoctrination attempts. Moreover, the other party is essentially spouting off a spate of lies.
Travelers from democratic societies absolutely have the freedom to refuse to be brainwashed.
Susie Su is a Taiwanese living in Australia.
Translated by Tim Smith
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS