Brian Niccol is cleaning the grounds out of the coffee machines.
On Tuesday, the new Starbucks Corp chief executive officer suspended guidance for next year after sales plunged.
Like his counterpart at Nike Inc, where new CEO Elliott Hill also withdrew the company’s outlook for its fiscal year, Niccol is in effect carrying out the classic corporate “kitchen sinking.”
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
This involves getting all of the bad news out of the way early to create a low base from which to rebuild.
Like Hill, he should go further.
In Niccol’s case, that means ditching the aggressive targets that Starbucks patriarch Howard Schultz set two years ago to expand global same store-sales by 7 to 9 percent through next year and increase earnings by 15 to 20 percent per annum over the same period.
Given that Starbucks reported a 7 percent decline in same-store sales in the quarter ended Sept. 29 and that Niccol has suspended the current guidance, falling short of Schultz’s growth ambitions looks a foregone conclusion.
However, formally replacing Starbucks’ long-term goals with something achievable is still wise. It would wipe the coffee counter clean for what is shaping up to be Niccol’s “Back to Starbucks” strategic blueprint. Crucially, it would also set him apart from former CEO Laxman Narasimhan, who held onto Schultz’s targets and was forced to lower them several times.
The 6 percent decline in US same-store sales in the fiscal fourth quarter underlines the extent of the turnaround.
This is not a case of a corporate breakup or hiving off underperforming divisions to create value — although Nicol should look at options for its underperforming China business such as a full or partial sale or franchising.
Instead, fixing Starbucks is about doing lots of things better to ensure customers leave its cafes clutching their morning brews feeling delighted, not disappointed.
Niccol, who became CEO last month after reviving fast-casual dining chain Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc, appears to be aware of this requirement.
He said in a video message on Tuesday, echoing an open letter to staff last month, that he planned to restore Starbucks’ historic coffee shop vibe. He will also sensibly focus on the domestic business. More details will be revealed when Starbucks announces earnings.
However, we have gotten some clues. Niccol is revisiting its stores to ensure they have the amenities that customers expect — this could mean the return of self-service milk and sugar for example — and appropriate staffing.
Bloomberg News last week reported that only 33 percent of workers who responded to a survey of the chain’s 10,000 US company-owned locations said stores consistently had sufficient staffing.
Niccol said he would remove bottlenecks in cafes and simplify its overly complex menu. To help this along, he aims to refine its mobile ordering system, so that it does not overwhelm physical locations. Here he could emulate a strategy at Chipotle, where he established a separate assembly line for digital orders.
And he plans to overhaul marketing so that it is addressed to all customers, not just the narrow subset who are members of its loyalty program. He recently hired Tressie Lieberman, who previously worked at Chipotle as its chief brand officer.
Another focus: Pricing. Niccol recently cut back on promotions and discounts. The chain had increasingly leaned on these tools to drive demand, but they can lead to a spike in customers, exacerbating the long lines that have pushed some customers away.
Niccol should address the regular cost of a cup of coffee. While the chain has always had a premium positioning, prices have drifted up. Starbucks is an affordable luxury, but for many customers it has become increasingly unaffordable.
Restoring Starbucks’ local-coffeehouse feel also means upgrading stores. While new models are already being rolled out, many locations look tired. These two areas should be a priority.
The extent of the sales decline and Niccol’s long to-do list underline that, like at Nike, turning around Starbucks will not be quick or easy.
The shares have risen 26 percent since he was appointed in August. Given the scale of Niccol’s task, a dose of reality was needed. Investors should sip on a cold brew, not a frothy cappuccino.
Andrea Felsted is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering consumer goods and the retail industry. Previously, she was a reporter for the Financial Times. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
There appears to be a growing view among leaders and leading thinkers in Taiwan that their words and actions have no influence over how China approaches cross-Strait relations. According to this logic, China’s actions toward Taiwan are guided by China’s unwavering ambition to assert control over Taiwan. Many also believe Beijing’s approach is influenced by China’s domestic politics. As the thinking goes, former President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) made a good faith effort to demonstrate her moderation on cross-Strait issues throughout her tenure. During her 2016 inaugural address, Tsai sent several constructive signals, including by acknowledging the historical fact of interactions and
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
HSBC Holdings successfully fought off a breakup campaign by disgruntled Asian investors in recent years. Now, it has announced a restructuring along almost the same east-west lines. The obvious question is why? It says it is designed to create a simpler, more efficient and dynamic company. However, it looks a lot like the bank is also facing up to the political reality of the growing schism between the US and China. A new structure would not dissolve HSBC’s geopolitical challenges, but it could give the bank better options to respond quickly if things worsen. HSBC spent 2022 battling to convince shareholders of
China’s “Joint Sword-2024B” military exercises around Taiwan last week have sparked concerns in Taipei and allied capitals that Beijing’s risk tolerance is increasing, and rather than prioritizing efforts toward “peaceful unification,” it is ramping up efforts to bring about unification by force, whether that be a military quarantine, blockade or full-scale invasion. Catherine Lila Chou (周怡齡) and Mark Harrison are right in their recent book Revolutionary Taiwan: Making Nationhood in a Changing World Order that the nature of Beijing’s one-party political system, in which the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is always right, means Taiwanese identity is explained away as being the
RSS