An article published in the media recently on “cross-strait same-sex marriages” essentially called LGBT+ people’s marriages a national security “loophole.”
The rights of all LGBT+ couples come from the respect and pursuit of human rights, and we should defend the human rights of LGBT+ Taiwanese who fall in love with a partner from China and firmly defend their right to freely marry.
If people who believe that “China’s ‘united front’ workers” could infiltrate Taiwan simply through a genuine cross-strait same-sex marriage looked into the situation more closely, they would find that the majority of “united front workers” come to Taiwan through heterosexual marriages. Why would they spend time, money and effort in faking being a part of the LGBT+ community, and go through the difficult process of registering a cross-strait same-sex marriage just to enter Taiwan?
Perhaps they think that the government has thrust the doors wide open for same-sex couples spanning the Taiwan Strait simply to show their support for LGBT+ civil rights. This is wrongheaded. The Mainland Affairs Council has said that the government is respecting the judicial rulings of the executive and judicial branches.
Anyone doubting this could do an online search, where they might find a story on the Web site for the Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights about one cross-strait couple named Ryan and Righ, who married in the US and later applied to return to Taiwan as a married couple with their marriage from the US recognized. Their case was reviewed by the Taipei High Administrative Court and to date has garnered two court rulings partially in their favor. The government must abide by judicial rulings and respect constitutional government bodies as it opens up access to marriage for cross-strait same-sex couples.
Some say that heterosexual cross-strait couples are already a security loophole. Their idea of national security is about not allowing any marriages for any cross-strait couples, and not allowing any Chinese to set foot in Taiwan.
If the Chinese Communist Party really wanted to infiltrate Taiwan, it would probably just permit Chinese “united front workers” to first change their nationality, or directly buy off people of Han descent in other countries. So, would Taiwan want to prohibit all people with Han ancestry or foreigners from entering its borders?
The only solution is to bolster national security checks, and not base checks on national origin and lumping everyone together. Cross-strait marriages already undergo a strict national security review mechanism, and interviews conducted by customs agents at Taiwan’s ports go as far as asking couples minute daily life details, such as which side of the bed they or their partner sleep on.
“The more Taiwanese come together, the more secure the country is” is inspiration enough to protect Taiwan and make it indomitable; anything else is extra. The thing that truly brings Taiwanese together is that we are one people in this island nation, with love for one’s neighbor.
Suppose someone in your family or friend group fell in love with someone of the same sex, but that person had the misfortune of being born in China. If the Taiwanese partner was not allowed to marry their Chinese partner, and was forced by friends and family to break up or move to China, then where would we find this supposed spirit of love for one’s neighbor?
Lin Sheng-yi is a member of the Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights.
Translated by Tim Smith
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS