An article published in the media recently on “cross-strait same-sex marriages” essentially called LGBT+ people’s marriages a national security “loophole.”
The rights of all LGBT+ couples come from the respect and pursuit of human rights, and we should defend the human rights of LGBT+ Taiwanese who fall in love with a partner from China and firmly defend their right to freely marry.
If people who believe that “China’s ‘united front’ workers” could infiltrate Taiwan simply through a genuine cross-strait same-sex marriage looked into the situation more closely, they would find that the majority of “united front workers” come to Taiwan through heterosexual marriages. Why would they spend time, money and effort in faking being a part of the LGBT+ community, and go through the difficult process of registering a cross-strait same-sex marriage just to enter Taiwan?
Perhaps they think that the government has thrust the doors wide open for same-sex couples spanning the Taiwan Strait simply to show their support for LGBT+ civil rights. This is wrongheaded. The Mainland Affairs Council has said that the government is respecting the judicial rulings of the executive and judicial branches.
Anyone doubting this could do an online search, where they might find a story on the Web site for the Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights about one cross-strait couple named Ryan and Righ, who married in the US and later applied to return to Taiwan as a married couple with their marriage from the US recognized. Their case was reviewed by the Taipei High Administrative Court and to date has garnered two court rulings partially in their favor. The government must abide by judicial rulings and respect constitutional government bodies as it opens up access to marriage for cross-strait same-sex couples.
Some say that heterosexual cross-strait couples are already a security loophole. Their idea of national security is about not allowing any marriages for any cross-strait couples, and not allowing any Chinese to set foot in Taiwan.
If the Chinese Communist Party really wanted to infiltrate Taiwan, it would probably just permit Chinese “united front workers” to first change their nationality, or directly buy off people of Han descent in other countries. So, would Taiwan want to prohibit all people with Han ancestry or foreigners from entering its borders?
The only solution is to bolster national security checks, and not base checks on national origin and lumping everyone together. Cross-strait marriages already undergo a strict national security review mechanism, and interviews conducted by customs agents at Taiwan’s ports go as far as asking couples minute daily life details, such as which side of the bed they or their partner sleep on.
“The more Taiwanese come together, the more secure the country is” is inspiration enough to protect Taiwan and make it indomitable; anything else is extra. The thing that truly brings Taiwanese together is that we are one people in this island nation, with love for one’s neighbor.
Suppose someone in your family or friend group fell in love with someone of the same sex, but that person had the misfortune of being born in China. If the Taiwanese partner was not allowed to marry their Chinese partner, and was forced by friends and family to break up or move to China, then where would we find this supposed spirit of love for one’s neighbor?
Lin Sheng-yi is a member of the Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights.
Translated by Tim Smith
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS