An article published in the media recently on “cross-strait same-sex marriages” essentially called LGBT+ people’s marriages a national security “loophole.”
The rights of all LGBT+ couples come from the respect and pursuit of human rights, and we should defend the human rights of LGBT+ Taiwanese who fall in love with a partner from China and firmly defend their right to freely marry.
If people who believe that “China’s ‘united front’ workers” could infiltrate Taiwan simply through a genuine cross-strait same-sex marriage looked into the situation more closely, they would find that the majority of “united front workers” come to Taiwan through heterosexual marriages. Why would they spend time, money and effort in faking being a part of the LGBT+ community, and go through the difficult process of registering a cross-strait same-sex marriage just to enter Taiwan?
Perhaps they think that the government has thrust the doors wide open for same-sex couples spanning the Taiwan Strait simply to show their support for LGBT+ civil rights. This is wrongheaded. The Mainland Affairs Council has said that the government is respecting the judicial rulings of the executive and judicial branches.
Anyone doubting this could do an online search, where they might find a story on the Web site for the Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights about one cross-strait couple named Ryan and Righ, who married in the US and later applied to return to Taiwan as a married couple with their marriage from the US recognized. Their case was reviewed by the Taipei High Administrative Court and to date has garnered two court rulings partially in their favor. The government must abide by judicial rulings and respect constitutional government bodies as it opens up access to marriage for cross-strait same-sex couples.
Some say that heterosexual cross-strait couples are already a security loophole. Their idea of national security is about not allowing any marriages for any cross-strait couples, and not allowing any Chinese to set foot in Taiwan.
If the Chinese Communist Party really wanted to infiltrate Taiwan, it would probably just permit Chinese “united front workers” to first change their nationality, or directly buy off people of Han descent in other countries. So, would Taiwan want to prohibit all people with Han ancestry or foreigners from entering its borders?
The only solution is to bolster national security checks, and not base checks on national origin and lumping everyone together. Cross-strait marriages already undergo a strict national security review mechanism, and interviews conducted by customs agents at Taiwan’s ports go as far as asking couples minute daily life details, such as which side of the bed they or their partner sleep on.
“The more Taiwanese come together, the more secure the country is” is inspiration enough to protect Taiwan and make it indomitable; anything else is extra. The thing that truly brings Taiwanese together is that we are one people in this island nation, with love for one’s neighbor.
Suppose someone in your family or friend group fell in love with someone of the same sex, but that person had the misfortune of being born in China. If the Taiwanese partner was not allowed to marry their Chinese partner, and was forced by friends and family to break up or move to China, then where would we find this supposed spirit of love for one’s neighbor?
Lin Sheng-yi is a member of the Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights.
Translated by Tim Smith
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS