An article published in the media recently on “cross-strait same-sex marriages” essentially called LGBT+ people’s marriages a national security “loophole.”
The rights of all LGBT+ couples come from the respect and pursuit of human rights, and we should defend the human rights of LGBT+ Taiwanese who fall in love with a partner from China and firmly defend their right to freely marry.
If people who believe that “China’s ‘united front’ workers” could infiltrate Taiwan simply through a genuine cross-strait same-sex marriage looked into the situation more closely, they would find that the majority of “united front workers” come to Taiwan through heterosexual marriages. Why would they spend time, money and effort in faking being a part of the LGBT+ community, and go through the difficult process of registering a cross-strait same-sex marriage just to enter Taiwan?
Perhaps they think that the government has thrust the doors wide open for same-sex couples spanning the Taiwan Strait simply to show their support for LGBT+ civil rights. This is wrongheaded. The Mainland Affairs Council has said that the government is respecting the judicial rulings of the executive and judicial branches.
Anyone doubting this could do an online search, where they might find a story on the Web site for the Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights about one cross-strait couple named Ryan and Righ, who married in the US and later applied to return to Taiwan as a married couple with their marriage from the US recognized. Their case was reviewed by the Taipei High Administrative Court and to date has garnered two court rulings partially in their favor. The government must abide by judicial rulings and respect constitutional government bodies as it opens up access to marriage for cross-strait same-sex couples.
Some say that heterosexual cross-strait couples are already a security loophole. Their idea of national security is about not allowing any marriages for any cross-strait couples, and not allowing any Chinese to set foot in Taiwan.
If the Chinese Communist Party really wanted to infiltrate Taiwan, it would probably just permit Chinese “united front workers” to first change their nationality, or directly buy off people of Han descent in other countries. So, would Taiwan want to prohibit all people with Han ancestry or foreigners from entering its borders?
The only solution is to bolster national security checks, and not base checks on national origin and lumping everyone together. Cross-strait marriages already undergo a strict national security review mechanism, and interviews conducted by customs agents at Taiwan’s ports go as far as asking couples minute daily life details, such as which side of the bed they or their partner sleep on.
“The more Taiwanese come together, the more secure the country is” is inspiration enough to protect Taiwan and make it indomitable; anything else is extra. The thing that truly brings Taiwanese together is that we are one people in this island nation, with love for one’s neighbor.
Suppose someone in your family or friend group fell in love with someone of the same sex, but that person had the misfortune of being born in China. If the Taiwanese partner was not allowed to marry their Chinese partner, and was forced by friends and family to break up or move to China, then where would we find this supposed spirit of love for one’s neighbor?
Lin Sheng-yi is a member of the Taiwan Alliance to Promote Civil Partnership Rights.
Translated by Tim Smith
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS