A tragedy occurred last week when a 15-year-old boy driving without a license in Taipei’s Neihu District (內湖) struck a restaurant, killing three. Furious citizens have called for the death penalty or corporal punishment for the teenager.
While absurd at first glance, the situation’s development provides some explanation as to why people might raise such an impossible proposition.
Although the perpetrator’s father verbally apologized following the incident, he did not attend the memorial ceremonies of the victims, nor did he attempt to compensate their families. Instead, he hired a renowned lawyer to defend his son.
Additionally, several of the perpetrator’s relatives all coincidentally reported to the media that the boy, surnamed Zeng (曾), was always a smart and well-behaved child. They said that he was very cute when he was younger, and that this accident has been a huge blow to his family. However, they shared no sympathy or remorse for the victims.
What is even more bizarre is that after some commentators criticized the bias in these media reports — while making no comments about the child himself — a great number of the articles were reported and removed. Some are speculating as to whether the articles were removed with the help of a public relations firm that might have created fake accounts to report them.
Similar scenarios have occurred in the past — for example, there were previously a large number of fake accounts based in Russia and the Middle East devoted to liking posts about Taiwan People’s Party Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲).
In recent decades, many advanced countries have promoted restorative justice, hoping for a process by which the perpetrators show accountability, engage in self-reflection, sincerely apologize, and adequately compensate the victims of a crime.
Under the premise that criminal procedure is not affected, restorative justice remedies the harm done and helps victims heal their physical and emotional wounds as much as possible, additionally preventing the likelihood of reoffense.
However, genuine self-reflection of perpetrators is the main criterion for the success of this great system. If a perpetrator or their family would rather spend copious amounts of money hiring a big name lawyer to influence the judicial process, or hire a public relations firm to manipulate public opinion, than earnestly compensate the victims, such a system would be impossible to implement.
Instead, it would give rise to radical discourse — like suggesting corporal punishment or the death penalty for minors — or even result in illegal retaliation. We could find ourselves in a tragedy like the one in the movie Seeking Justice, in which everybody only suffers more harm — an outcome that would benefit no one.
The Korean drama Juvenile Justice tells us that the more wealthy and powerful a family, the more likely they are able to hire a renowned lawyer to lighten the sentence of their offending child. In turn, their children are discouraged from examining their own mistakes, and these young offenders are even less likely to take responsibility for their actions in the future.
When children like this become adults, they would inevitably face greater disaster and end up paying an even heavier price. Before a child unfortunately ends up inside juvenile court, their parents must teach them to bear responsibility for their own behavior.
Chen Jun-kuang is an attending physician in the psychiatry department at Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
President Jimmy Carter, who turned 100 years old this month, has not been highly thought of in Taiwan since his 1978 decision to derecognize Taipei as the seat of the “Republic of China.” But with a half-century’s hindsight, President Carter’s derecognition of the ROC, viewed together with his straightforward diplomacy to preserve the full substance of America’s relations with Taiwan, can now be seen in a far more positive light, especially when compared to his predecessors, Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. In considering Carter’s decisions to recognize the People’s Republic of China as the “sole legal government of China” and break
Public health is one of Taiwan’s greatest strengths. Its National Health Insurance was already one of the best single-payer systems in the world, ensuring that everyone has coverage while staying nimble in the face of financial challenges. The COVID-19 pandemic was a chance for the world to see Taiwan’s full public health apparatus at work. Officials caught wind of a strange virus circulating in China and jumped to screen and then stem the flow of travelers before the word “coronavirus” even made headlines. It was one of the only countries in the world to escape widespread transmission before vaccines were distributed,
The Chinese Ministry of Commerce on Oct. 12 announced that it would consider adopting further measures in response to Taiwan’s trade barriers on certain goods from China, based on the findings of an investigation it launched late last year. The measures could include tariffs or other forms of economic pressure. The announcement is yet another political move by Beijing that is more declarative than substantive. The timing was not coincidental, as it came shortly after President William Lai (賴清德) delivered his first Double Ten National Day speech after taking office on May 20, which was moderate on the cross-strait relationship,
On Monday morning last week, many Chinese investors woke up anticipating a raft of new stimulus measures to save the Chinese economy during an official Chinese Communist Party (CCP) news conference. Instead, by about 5am the CCP had launched military exercises surrounding Taiwan. State media announced that China would “completely reunify” Taiwan with its “ancestral homeland.” The refurbished Liaoning aircraft carrier, which had only days prior returned to its home berth at Yuchi Naval Base in China’s Shandong Province, was rushed back out to sea to traverse the Bashi Channel separating Taiwan and the Philippines to take its position for the exercises. The