The Chinese Ministry of Commerce on Oct. 12 announced that it would consider adopting further measures in response to Taiwan’s trade barriers on certain goods from China, based on the findings of an investigation it launched late last year. The measures could include tariffs or other forms of economic pressure. The announcement is yet another political move by Beijing that is more declarative than substantive. The timing was not coincidental, as it came shortly after President William Lai (賴清德) delivered his first Double Ten National Day speech after taking office on May 20, which was moderate on the cross-strait relationship, but still irked China.
The two sides could resolve their trade spat at any time using WTO mechanisms, the Executive Yuan said. It expressed regret over Beijing’s accusations and called on Chinese authorities to stop its economic coercion and political manipulation of Taiwan.
Beijing was attempting to pressure Taiwanese businesses in China to continue their manufacturing operations or investment there, amid a gradual exodus of foreign companies from China, the Mainland Affairs Council said on Thursday last week.
The latest announcement followed China’s suspension of preferential tariffs on 134 Taiwanese products under the Cross-Strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement on June 15, citing Taiwan’s “failure” to reciprocate by easing trade restrictions on Chinese products. While the move affects certain Taiwanese industries, its economic impact is estimated to be minimal due to the nation’s declining trade dependence on China in the past few years. Moreover, Chinese economic coercion is becoming increasingly ineffective and might be counterproductive.
As a global supply chain realignment continues following the COVID-19 pandemic and as more firms relocate their operations from China to avoid US tariffs, including China-based Taiwanese companies returning home in the past few years, Taiwan’s economic and trade dependence on China has fallen.
For example, exports grew 10.2 percent year-on-year in the first nine months of this year, with shipments to the US surging 59.7 percent and those to ASEAN members rising 14.3 percent, while exports to China (including Hong Kong) fell 2.7 percent, Ministry of Finance data showed. Moreover, the proportion of exports to the US rose to 24.1 percent, the highest in 25 years, while that of exports to China (including Hong Kong) fell to 31.2 percent, the lowest in 23 years. The proportion of exports to ASEAN members was stable at 18.2 percent, the data showed.
The government also approved US$41.56 billion in outbound investments, excluding China, in the first nine months of this year, representing a 137.75 percent surge from the previous year, thanks to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s investment in its US subsidiary.
Outbound investments to New Southbound Policy countries — mainly Singapore, Vietnam and Malaysia — rose 83.09 percent to US$7.93 billion in the same period, higher than those to China at US$3.34 billion, Department of Investment Review data released last week showed.
As Taiwan continues to transform its industrial and export structure, and as more firms shift to global markets rather than focus on China, the nation has firmly established itself as a key player in the global tech supply chain. As a result, it has become increasingly difficult for China to use economic coercion to pressure Taiwan over political disputes.
Nevertheless, the government should still take note of China’s actions, which not only aim to put pressure on the ruling Democratic Progressive Party, but also influence Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. Taipei must still evaluate possible scenarios and explore the potential of negotiating with Beijing.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS