Indonesian President Joko Widodo left office yesterday with high approval ratings thanks to strong economic growth, but his successor Prabowo Subianto has bigger ambitions, including an eye-catching US$28 billion free meal plan for students.
While the country regularly enjoys about five percent annual growth, the former general has pledged to capitalize on his predecessor’s policies to reach eight percent by tapping the nation’s huge human resources.
“From prosperity, we can bring justice to all Indonesian people. We must unite to eliminate poverty and eliminate hunger, and eliminate suffering from our people,” Prabowo said in his victory speech in March.
To do that, he is banking on big national projects, the archipelago’s vast natural resources and attempts to lower a poverty rate of more than nine percent.
He has pledged to largely carry on the popular economic program of Widodo, better known as Jokowi, and has also signaled a more direct attempt to alleviate poverty in the nation of about 280 million.
His big campaign pledge is a US$28 billion plan to supply tens of millions of schoolchildren and pregnant women nationwide with free meals.
He says the scheme — to be rolled out in January — would halt stunted growth in a country where more than one-fifth of children up to five years old are affected and create several million more jobs.
Yet the plan has faced criticism over logistical and cost issues, with some wondering how he could pull off the plan and keep spending within the annual fiscal deficit limit of three percent of GDP, which is mandated by law.
Jokowi focused on large infrastructure projects, including roads, bridges and airports, aimed at better connecting the archipelago.
However, experts say Prabowo would deviate from that in his bid to realize a campaign promise to turn Indonesia, a G20 member, into an “advanced and developed” economy.
“He won’t be blindly following Jokowi’s footsteps, but he also won’t completely abandon or neglect everything, so he will be somewhat in the middle,” the Centre for Strategic and International Studies economist Yose Rizal Damuri said. “It seems like he has a slightly different approach from Jokowi. The priority is no longer infrastructure development, but more to human capital development.”
His agenda would also focus on agriculture, with a food estate program aimed at achieving food self-sufficiency, land clearing for bioethanol projects in the restive eastern region of Papua and a green fund selling carbon emission credits, observers said.
At the same time, Prabowo is inheriting Jokowi’s legacy project — a US$32 billion move of the capital from traffic-clogged and sinking Jakarta to Nusantara, a planned green city in eastern Borneo, where construction is underway.
The city would not be ready until 2045, but its rapid construction is already eating into state coffers. Prabowo has pledged to continue the project despite speculation he would put it on hold or keep Jakarta as the capital.
He has also supported Jokowi’s resource nationalism, particularly in the nickel sector, where Jakarta has imposed export restrictions in a bid to become a key player in the electric vehicle supply chain.
Indonesia is one of the world’s biggest fossil fuel polluters, and Prabowo has backed gradually reducing the country’s reliance on them. However, his family retains ties to the coal industry and processing vast sums of nickel requires coal-fired power plants.
China’s Southeast Asian investments last year were the biggest in Indonesia, and Prabowo met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in his first foreign meeting after winning the election.
It signaled the importance he has placed on continuing to attract Beijing’s money, which has proven crucial to Indonesia’s economic growth.
On top of his early trips abroad, Prabowo’s Cabinet choices and his first budget after inauguration would also give a better indication as to his economic plans.
Indonesian Minister of Finance Sri Mulyani last week said that she had been asked to retain her role in the new government, which experts say is a signal to markets that there would be continuity.
“With Sri Mulyani joining his Cabinet, it shows that Prabowo will be very careful in terms of fiscal issues,” Center of Economic and Law Studies economist Bhima Yudhistira Adhinegara said. “That’s why Jokowi’s people are now hired again; it shows that Prabowo will be disciplined.”
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
Taiwan-India relations appear to have been put on the back burner this year, including on Taiwan’s side. Geopolitical pressures have compelled both countries to recalibrate their priorities, even as their core security challenges remain unchanged. However, what is striking is the visible decline in the attention India once received from Taiwan. The absence of the annual Diwali celebrations for the Indian community and the lack of a commemoration marking the 30-year anniversary of the representative offices, the India Taipei Association and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center, speak volumes and raise serious questions about whether Taiwan still has a coherent India
Recent media reports have again warned that traditional Chinese medicine pharmacies are disappearing and might vanish altogether within the next 15 years. Yet viewed through the broader lens of social and economic change, the rise and fall — or transformation — of industries is rarely the result of a single factor, nor is it inherently negative. Taiwan itself offers a clear parallel. Once renowned globally for manufacturing, it is now best known for its high-tech industries. Along the way, some businesses successfully transformed, while others disappeared. These shifts, painful as they might be for those directly affected, have not necessarily harmed society
Legislators of the opposition parties, consisting of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Friday moved to initiate impeachment proceedings against President William Lai (賴清德). They accused Lai of undermining the nation’s constitutional order and democracy. For anyone who has been paying attention to the actions of the KMT and the TPP in the legislature since they gained a combined majority in February last year, pushing through constitutionally dubious legislation, defunding the Control Yuan and ensuring that the Constitutional Court is unable to operate properly, such an accusation borders the absurd. That they are basing this
RSS