It is easy to think of humans as existing separately from nature. However, the greatest threats to humanity come from crises affecting nature, not least climate change, biodiversity loss and rampant pollution. We cannot address any of these until we stop taking nature for granted and start investing more in it.
“Nature-positive” investments in marine conservation, sustainable land management, water security and afforestation could deliver around 30 percent of the emissions abatement needed to limit global warming to 1.5°C — the target enshrined in the Paris climate agreement. Moreover, such investments not only improve our resilience to climate change, but they also would help to prevent future pandemics.
Ahead of the 16th UN Biodiversity Conference of the Parties (COP16) in Cali, Colombia, this month, we must remember that the crises affecting nature also pose structural risks to the global economy, our collective well-being and prosperity, and the UN Sustainable Development Goals. About 55 percent of global GDP is highly or moderately dependent on nature.
Illustration: Yusha
In Cali, delegates from nearly 200 countries would discuss how to accelerate action to protect 30 percent of the planet’s land and maritime areas, reduce pollution and restore degraded ecosystems by 2030. One of the key obstacles to meeting these ambitious targets is financing. Not only do we invest far too much in activities that harm nature and make our problems worse, but we also invest only one-third of what is needed to meet the 2030 targets for climate, biodiversity and land degradation.
INVESTMENT PRIORITIES
To scale up nature-positive investment, we need to do four things.
First, we must build more effective public-private partnerships between countries and public development banks, as well as with nature organizations, companies and private-sector financial institutions. This would help de-risk investments, prepare projects, and deliver impact at scale for climate, nature and inclusive economic development.
Second, we need to revive and mainstream regenerative practices and stewardship of biodiversity, particularly in the agriculture, forestry and fishing sectors.
Third, we need common principles, standards and disclosure mechanisms to track nature-positive finance and its impact, and to disclose more information on the nature-related footprints, dependencies, and risk exposure of companies and financial institutions.
Finally, to take nature into consideration in all policies and investment decisions, we must decrease the flow of financing to activities that are harmful to nature.
Multilateral development banks would play a key role in scaling up green investments. Institutions such as the European Investment Bank (EIB) are already stepping up support for the protection, restoration and sustainable use of nature with the launch of common principles for tracking nature-positive finance. Such information is essential for measuring and incorporating nature into multilateral lenders’ operations, as well as informing other investors about what constitutes a nature-positive investment. Partnerships and joint efforts to put these principles into practice are ongoing.
At the European level, the EIB is working closely with the European Commission to support the implementation of the EU’s 2030 Biodiversity Strategy worldwide. We strive to ensure that all the projects we finance cause “no loss” of biodiversity, and we are factoring biodiversity and ecosystem considerations into all our activities.
Moreover, because one of the biggest challenges in scaling up nature-positive investments lies in structuring projects, we are providing advisory services to help nature-restoration and biodiversity initiatives get off the ground.
FINANCIAL MOBILIZATION
In Morocco, the EIB advised and lent 100 million euros (US$109 million) to preserve and restore more than 600,000 hectares of forest.
In Ivory Coast, we are gearing up to support sustainable cocoa farming, in which forests are preserved rather than cut down. To support marine conservation, we are working with partner institutions on the very successful Clean Oceans Initiative, which is ahead of schedule in providing 4 billion euros for projects to limit plastic waste.
Innovative financial instruments that transfer risk could help mobilize more public and private finance for such investments. The EIB-financed Land Degradation Neutrality Fund, for example, provides finance and technical assistance for sustainable agriculture and forestry around the world, and the EcoEnterprises Fund supports pro-biodiversity businesses in Latin America.
The EIB is also exploring a new investment in a fund that supports afforestation, forest management and conservation projects in the region. At COP16, we hope to build on such initiatives to scale up financing for nature.
We urgently need to reduce the flow of finance to activities that harm nature. Doing so is central to overcoming the triple planetary crisis of climate change, pollution and biodiversity loss.
Ambroise Fayolle is vice president of the European Investment Bank.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) said “know yourself and know your enemy and you will win a hundred battles.” Applied in our times, Taiwanese should know themselves and know the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) so that Taiwan will win a hundred battles and hopefully, deter the CCP. Taiwanese receive information daily about the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) threat from the Ministry of National Defense and news sources. One area that needs better understanding is which forces would the People’s Republic of China (PRC) use to impose martial law and what would be the consequences for living under PRC
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
Beijing’s approval of a controversial mega-dam in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo River — which flows from Tibet — has ignited widespread debate over its strategic and environmental implications. The project exacerbates the complexities of India-China relations, and underscores Beijing’s push for hydropower dominance and potential weaponization of water against India. India and China are caught in a protracted territorial dispute along the Line of Actual Control. The approval of a dam on a transboundary river adds another layer to an already strained bilateral relationship, making dialogue and trust-building even more challenging, especially given that the two Asian
RSS