The Nobel Prize in Economics this year was awarded to Turkish-American Daron Acemoglu and British-Americans Simon Johnson and James Robinson for their research into the legacies of colonialism and global inequality, especially in countries dogged by corruption and dictatorship.
The economists studied institutions created by the European colonial powers.
The three economists “have demonstrated the importance of societal institutions for a country’s prosperity,” the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Nobel committee said.
Acemoglu and Robinson were expected to win the Nobel Prize in 2012 when they published their seminal Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty.
It is of no surprise to anyone that they have scaled new heights since its publication.
Researching 1,000 years of global history, they have identified the historical roots for the vast differences in income between countries and discovered why rich nations can sustain their prosperity.
The key for societies to maintain prosperity is the type of economic and political systems they employ, their research showed.
Inclusive institutions create long-term benefits across the board, while extractive institutions — created to exploit populations — provide only short-term gains for the people in power and are bad for long-term growth.
Societies with weak rule of law and institutions that exploit the population do not generate growth or change for the better over the long term, it showed.
Robinson in an interview following the announcement of the award said that he doubts China can sustain its economic prosperity if it keeps its repressive political system.
He also said that Taiwan is a modern example of a formerly exclusive system that transitioned to a relatively inclusive and open society.
Speaking to reporters in Athens last week, Acemoglu said: “Authoritarian growth is often more unstable and doesn’t generally lead to very rapid and original innovation.”
He said that China posed “a bit of a challenge” to open and inclusive societies.
The theories and knowledge that these researchers provide are rich and far-sighted, and could be used to improve the governance of a country, region or an organization.
Their research highlights that China’s overproduction of electric vehicles, infrastructure, housing construction and building materials is against market principles.
Excessive market intervention and printing currency cause inflation, industry regression, local debt crisis, countermeasures from other countries and poverty for its 600 million people, as suggested by former Chinese premier Li Keqiang (李克強).
This is the calamity of a country ruled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). China’s road to economic recovery is destined to be shaky.
In the final analysis, tyranny is a losing system.
However, Acemoglu warned in the same interview that studies show that public institutions and the rule of law in many parts of the world are being weakened.
Taiwan’s Republic of China Consitution is the source of the “one China framework” which shackles Taiwan and is an obstacle to the forging of a national identity.
After all, a fair and just constitution is the foundation of a long-standing system.
A democratic society relies not on rule by law or rule by one, but on strong institutions. These are the key to avoiding failure.
Lin Wen-ping is a Yunlin County councilor.
Translated by Fion Khan
National defense plans are generally focused on preparing to defend against the military aggression of an adversary. In the case of Taiwan, such plans center on China, which possesses a dramatically larger and more powerful military. However, a recent tabletop exercise conducted by the Taiwan Center for Security Studies and other institutions revealed several nonmilitary vulnerabilities in Taiwan, particularly in the areas of economics, cybersecurity and energy. The exercise, set in 2032 and simulating crises such as cross-strait tensions and global conflicts, demonstrated that modern conflicts often extend beyond traditional military aggression, underscoring the need for new defense strategies and continuous
There is no more watertight demonstration of the predictability of an event than that it was accurately predicted long before it happened. On Thursday last week, the day President William Lai (賴清德) delivered his Double Ten National Day address, a Nikkei Asia article quoted a senior national security official as saying that “regardless of what Lai said,” Beijing could launch military exercises to intimidate Taiwan and claim it was “caused by Taiwan’s provocation.” Lo and behold, four days after Lai’s speech, Taiwan was encircled by fighter jets, drones, warships and coast guard boats in an operation Beijing called “Joint Sword-2024B.” The
When Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) met with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Sept. 27, Wang said that the greatest threat in the Taiwan Strait is the increasingly unchecked actions of “Taiwan separatists.” Blinken responded by emphasizing the importance of maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, before turning to concern for human rights issues in Xinjiang, Tibet and Hong Kong. Wang’s statements are nothing new and can be found in the official “united front” talking points and phrases curated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) over the past several decades. The CCP employs
The relationship between India and Taiwan is evolving, driven by a shared understanding of the need for enhanced cooperation across various sectors. While the semiconductor industry has captured significant attention due to its strategic importance and mutual economic interests, it is equally important to explore and address other areas of potential collaboration between the two countries. The India Semiconductor Mission is a government initiative that allocates US$10 billion to build a robust semiconductor ecosystem in India. It offers financial support covering up to 50 percent of project costs for fabrication plants and related initiatives, aiming to establish India as a key