The Double Ten National Day ceremonies have been concluded. President William Lai (賴清德) gave his first National Day address and dignitaries from abroad presented their congratulations. The perfunctory wining and dining has ended, but not to be outdone, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) showed its displeasure with a simulated blockade of Taiwan.
So what next?
The future always has its uncertainties, but for Lai, three necessary steps stand out to demand his focus.
First, Lai must regain the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) majority in the Legislative Yuan. He must find a way to win back the votes of the seats that the party lost by finding common ground for cooperation.
That path is quite well laid out. The seats were lost when a sizeable number of voters grew tired of the unproductive bickering between the two major parties and sought a third voice, the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP).
Unfortunately, the TPP did not live up to that hope. It not only did not live up to that hope, but it is now dead in the water.
For those who follow Taiwanese politics closely, the TPP was already in danger after the last election. In that election it failed to win any local legislative seats; instead it had only achieved eight legislator-at-large positions, and if that was not bad enough, those legislators quickly proved to be unproductive.
Instead of coming up with programs that could justify why voters sought a third party, they simply became running dogs for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Taiwan was back in its former quagmire.
Such actions by the TPP proved to be a betrayal, especially for the young. They had sought a new voice to counter the unproductive major parties. It did not happen.
Now that TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) faces charges of corruption, those that hoped for change must look elsewhere. The TPP is dead in the water; it has no future. Its legislators must choose which major party they side with for future change.
Winning their support presents a clear challenge, but also a golden opportunity for the DPP to regain what it lost. It will not be easy, but it is the needed direction and focus that Lai must take if he is to accomplish anything significant as president. Without a majority in the legislature, it cannot be done.
Next, Lai must look outward to Taiwan’s regional needs. Here he must seek to strengthen Taiwan’s alliances, particularly with the Philippines and Japan.
Any and all regional alliances can be beneficial, but those with the Philippines and Japan are crucial. These two nations guard Taiwan’s flanks.
Across the Taiwan Strait, the PRC continues with its hegemonic ambitions; most recently in the South China Sea it has upped its efforts in harassing the Philippines.
Taiwan stands as the lynchpin between the South and East China seas; it also stands between China’s direct route to the Pacific. That route must pass between Taiwan and the Philippines or Taiwan and Japan. This mutual need must be obvious to all three.
The Philippines has constantly had its sovereignty challenged by the PRC in the South China Sea; it needs a supportive neighbor. Japan needs a free Taiwan Strait so that its trade, which passes through the South China Sea, is not interrupted.
Japan has already begun promoting a type of Asian NATO to counter China, while the Philippines has gone as far as to seek an alliance with South Korea.
The needs are there. A free and democratic Taiwan provides regional stability and Lai can easily build on this base for the safety of Taiwan.
With control of the legislature and regional stability, Lai can then focus on other pressing domestic challenges.
From industry to banking to military conscription, Lai has a laundry list of challenges to choose from. Many of course are problems not only for Taiwan, but also the rest of the world.
One problem that Taiwan has long recognized is that of its aging population. This is not only a national issue; it is one that is increasingly gaining worldwide attention. In this matter, Japan, Taiwan’s immediate neighbor, is in even more dire straits.
What makes aging a natural for Taiwan is that it is not an isolated issue. Its solution involves other issues such as the economy. To solve the aging problem a younger workforce must be developed and strong enough to sustain a greater number at the top. This in turn involves bringing in immigrant workers from surrounding nations.
These three steps might seem simple, but they are in truth formidable challenges. If Lai can solve them, he would be guaranteed success.
Jerome Keating is a writer based in Taipei.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS