Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is Iran’s undisputed No. 1, but in the pecking order beneath the supreme leader are factions competing for influence as the country maps out how to react to growing setbacks and escalating confrontation with Israel, experts say.
While some insiders are seen as favoring negotiation, others believe in using force, with the outcome of the behind-the-scenes debate helping to determine whether the current tit-for-tat cycle spirals into a full-blown war.
In a rare public sermon last week, Khamenei vowed that Iran’s militant allies, primarily the Palestinian Hamas and Lebanese Hezbollah, would not “back down” in their war against Israel, the Islamic republic’s sworn enemy, which he said “does not have long to live.”
Yet last month, newly elected reformist Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian extended an apparent olive branch to the West at the UN, proposing the revival of the 2015 international nuclear deal that was unilaterally abandoned in 2018 by then-US president Donald Trump.
Experts say that as Israel prepares its response to Iran’s Oct. 1 missile attack, Khamenei remains keen to avoid all-out war, while showing the Islamic republic can still stand up to its enemies.
The supreme leader, who is chosen for life and has been in power since the death of Iran’s revolutionary leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1989, has long been seen as seeking to balance out the factions in Iran before deliberately and, sometimes slowly, coming to a decision.
“There were certainly dozens of hours of meetings and analysis before deciding on the details of the strike against Israel,” Mediterranean Foundation for Strategic Studies research director Pierre Razoux said. “It’s similar to a chess champion studying all possible moves and openings with their team before making a play.”
While Khamenei is the ultimate decisionmaker, Iran’s power structure is deeply complex with the president often only having a limited influence in foreign policy decisions.
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the regime’s ideological army that maintains links with Iran’s regional proxies, plays a crucial role, as do low-profile, but powerful, figures within the office of the supreme leader, including his son, Mojtaba Khamenei, who is sometimes seen as a successor.
“Despite its authoritarian nature, the Islamic republic has always had fractious factions that disagreed over the way in which they [Iran] should interact with the outside world,” said Behnam Ben Taleblu, an Iran expert at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies in Washington.
The president “does not control or set foreign and security policy. Rather, he is there to offer a change in style and not substance,” he added.
While intense debates might be happening behind closed doors over strategy, it would be extremely unusual for such splits to be revealed in public.
Ali “Khamenei adopts his decisions after consulting with members of the Iranian Supreme National Council, which, under the leadership of the reformists of the Iranian government, includes both conservative and reformist officials,” said Eva Koulouriotis, an independent expert on the region.
Positions change with events.
When Israel assassinated Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran in July, Ali Khamenei initially supported “a tactical retreat, which was the opinion of the reformists,” Koulouriotis said.
However, when Israel killed Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in Beirut in late last month, Ali Khamenei decided that a stronger response was necessary.
“So he adopted the opinion of the conservatives in the IRGC, who called on him to respond to the assassination of Haniyeh to deter Israel,” Koulouriotis said.
That led to the launch of about 200 Iranian missiles on Israel on Oct. 1. Were Israel to launch a major attack in response, pressure would mount on Ali Khamenei to respond more than just in kind.
Hezbollah is not just an ally for Iran. It is considered Tehran’s most crucial asset, a “crown jewel” boasting a formidable arsenal of drones, rockets and missiles of different ranges, and claiming 100,000 fighters.
Some experts have suggested that Hezbollah’s long-range missiles are tasked with defending Iran’s nuclear facilities, effectively serving as a sort of remote defense shield. Iran’s strategy in the coming months and years is therefore likely to depend on a complex mix of regional dynamics, pressure from global powers and internal factional battles.
“Given Iran’s repeated setbacks abroad, especially the loss of Hezbollah, considered its foreign policy linchpin, the radical wing succeeded in convincing the supreme leader that restoring Iran’s credibility was essential,” said analyst Hasni Abidi, director of the Center for Arab and Mediterranean World Studies in Geneva.
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
In competitive sports, the narrative surrounding transgender athletes is often clouded by misconceptions and prejudices. Critics sometimes accuse transgender athletes of “gaming the system” to gain an unfair advantage, perpetuating the stereotype that their participation undermines the integrity of competition. However, this perspective not only ignores the rigorous efforts transgender athletes invest to meet eligibility standards, but also devalues their personal and athletic achievements. Understanding the gap between these stereotypes and the reality of individual efforts requires a deeper examination of societal bias and the challenges transgender athletes face. One of the most pervasive arguments against the inclusion of transgender athletes
When viewing Taiwan’s political chaos, I often think of several lines from Incantation, a poem by the winner of the 1980 Nobel Prize in Literature, Czeslaw Milosz: “Beautiful and very young are Philo-Sophia, and poetry, her ally in the service of the good... Their friendship will be glorious, their time has no limit, their enemies have delivered themselves to destruction.” Milosz wrote Incantation when he was a professor of Slavic Studies at the University of California, Berkeley. He firmly believed that Poland would rise again under a restored democracy and liberal order. As one of several self-exiled or expelled poets from
EDITORIAL CARTOON
RSS