In a democratic society, the voters select politicians for elected office. These elected officials are then responsible for governing in their respective jurisdiction, and should undertake to perform all of the associated political and legal duties. If, for some reason, the politician that the voters had chosen falls short of the duties he or she is responsible for in that position, and cannot be relieved of this position before the term ends, then the work of the government cannot be carried out successfully. It is the voters that are left dealing with the repercussions of this failure of governance. Unfortunately, this is just a fact of life.
This is the situation that has been unfolding in Keelung. By most standards, the city of Keelung has, for several years now, seen the serious misuse of public resources, grievous lack of judgment in policy prioritization and questionable decisions when it comes to disaster response.
SHORTCOMINGS
This weekend, Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) survived a recall vote, with 86,604 votes against the recall and 69,934 for, with a turnout of 50.44 percent. Judging by the results, one would have to conclude that the majority of Keelung residents believe that Hsieh’s shortcomings are not serious enough to necessitate his leaving office before his term is up: They have decided to allow him to continue to serve as Keelung mayor.
As such, the city residents would have to put up with the repercussions of Hsieh’s continued governance, for good or for bad, especially the effect that it would have on the daily lives of ordinary people.
No matter how much the talking heads from other cities, counties or special municipalities have to say about the situation or how much sense their analysis made, they are not the people that would be affected by whether the recall was successful or not. Now that the recall has failed, residents of other locales would not have to carry the burden that is Hsieh’s leadership.
MISINTERPRETATIONS
It must also be said that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), to which Hsieh belongs, need not read too much into this rejection of the recall: It is not a national poll on the party that is showing the approval of the public; neither does it mean that the KMT has received a mandate from the country to continue its agenda within political arenas such as the Legislative Yuan.
The KMT needs to know that the public is very dissatisfied with its performance in the latest legislative session, seeking to grab more power for itself in the name of legislative “reform.”
NATIONWIDE SENTIMENT
In the recall campaign, the KMT mobilized the whole party’s machinery and members to support Hsieh and ensure that he was not recalled, but the result only reflects the latest trajectory of public opinion within Keelung itself and should not be extrapolated to the feeling within Taiwan as a whole.
If the KMT continues to disregard President William Lai’s (賴清德) call for reconciliation between the government and opposition parties — such as remarks he made during his Double Ten National Day address on Thursday last week — and misunderstands the public’s mood as a whole, the failed recall would only delay the eventual breakout of the public’s dissatisfaction with the KMT and the party would be emboldened to act on any further “retributive recalls” that it might be eyeing.
Roger Wu lives in New Taipei City and works in the service sector.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS