In a democratic society, the voters select politicians for elected office. These elected officials are then responsible for governing in their respective jurisdiction, and should undertake to perform all of the associated political and legal duties. If, for some reason, the politician that the voters had chosen falls short of the duties he or she is responsible for in that position, and cannot be relieved of this position before the term ends, then the work of the government cannot be carried out successfully. It is the voters that are left dealing with the repercussions of this failure of governance. Unfortunately, this is just a fact of life.
This is the situation that has been unfolding in Keelung. By most standards, the city of Keelung has, for several years now, seen the serious misuse of public resources, grievous lack of judgment in policy prioritization and questionable decisions when it comes to disaster response.
SHORTCOMINGS
This weekend, Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) survived a recall vote, with 86,604 votes against the recall and 69,934 for, with a turnout of 50.44 percent. Judging by the results, one would have to conclude that the majority of Keelung residents believe that Hsieh’s shortcomings are not serious enough to necessitate his leaving office before his term is up: They have decided to allow him to continue to serve as Keelung mayor.
As such, the city residents would have to put up with the repercussions of Hsieh’s continued governance, for good or for bad, especially the effect that it would have on the daily lives of ordinary people.
No matter how much the talking heads from other cities, counties or special municipalities have to say about the situation or how much sense their analysis made, they are not the people that would be affected by whether the recall was successful or not. Now that the recall has failed, residents of other locales would not have to carry the burden that is Hsieh’s leadership.
MISINTERPRETATIONS
It must also be said that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), to which Hsieh belongs, need not read too much into this rejection of the recall: It is not a national poll on the party that is showing the approval of the public; neither does it mean that the KMT has received a mandate from the country to continue its agenda within political arenas such as the Legislative Yuan.
The KMT needs to know that the public is very dissatisfied with its performance in the latest legislative session, seeking to grab more power for itself in the name of legislative “reform.”
NATIONWIDE SENTIMENT
In the recall campaign, the KMT mobilized the whole party’s machinery and members to support Hsieh and ensure that he was not recalled, but the result only reflects the latest trajectory of public opinion within Keelung itself and should not be extrapolated to the feeling within Taiwan as a whole.
If the KMT continues to disregard President William Lai’s (賴清德) call for reconciliation between the government and opposition parties — such as remarks he made during his Double Ten National Day address on Thursday last week — and misunderstands the public’s mood as a whole, the failed recall would only delay the eventual breakout of the public’s dissatisfaction with the KMT and the party would be emboldened to act on any further “retributive recalls” that it might be eyeing.
Roger Wu lives in New Taipei City and works in the service sector.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS