President William Lai’s (賴清德) first Double Ten National Day address had two strategic goals.
For domestic affairs, the speech aimed to foster consensus on national identity, strengthen the country and unite the Taiwanese against a Chinese invasion.
In terms of cross-strait relations, the speech aimed to mitigate tensions in the Taiwan Strait and promote the coexistence and prosperity of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in China and the Republic of China (ROC).
Lai is taking a different stance from previous Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administrations on domestic political issues.
During his speech, he said: “The PRC could not be the motherland of the people of the ROC,” commemorating our forebears’ overthrowing of the imperial regime and the establishment of a democratic republic. He also mentioned the Battle of Guningtou 75 years ago, the Aug. 23 Artillery Battle 66 years ago, the Kaohsiung Incident 45 years ago and the democracy movement.
Lai compared Taiwan to the early ROC by saying that our forebears, like the Taiwanese of today, carried the dream of democracy and the ideal of freedom. This was meant to remind the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) of the democratic progress that Taiwan has made over time, from overthrowing the Qing government and the rise of anti-communist and pro-Taiwan ideologies to more recent parliamentary election reforms. The message is that we must unite against any attempt by China to invade Taiwan, and protect the nation’s sovereignty and liberal democratic system.
He encouraged unity among supporters of the ROC, “the ROC on Taiwan,” and Taiwan, with a macro-narrative of the country’s history that emphasized a shared dream of one Taiwan.
Lai vowed to promote the “five plus two” innovative industries plan and the “six core strategic industries” policy; develop Taiwan’s “five trusted industry sectors,” including semiconductors and artificial intelligence; and help expand their global presence to bolster the local economy.
He also promised to advance the “Healthy Taiwan Cultivation Plan,” build a stronger social safety net, improve care for the disadvantaged and elderly people, and fight housing speculation.
Lai’s emphasis on people’s livelihoods was a call for opposition parties to prioritize social well-being over power struggles and work with the DPP, so that the government can implement its agenda in the national interest.
On cross-strait relations, Lai stressed that the ROC and the PRC are not subordinate to each other and that China has no right to represent Taiwan. Lai also called for Beijing to live up to the international community’s expectations of being a positive force for global peace and prosperity, after everything the world has done to help lift up China.
Taiwan is willing to work with China in maintaining regional security, and pursuing peace and prosperity for the all people across the Strait, Lai said.
Lai also said he wanted to move beyond the constraints of the Strait and make his appeal from a wider international perspective. He stressed Taiwan’s role in maintaining world peace with its strategically important geopolitical position. His call for cross-strait cooperation on regional security aligns with the international community’s hope for peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region.
His attempt to de-escalate cross-strait tensions by suggesting “mutual assistance and mutual benefit” and the “coexistence and prosperity” of China and Taiwan was strategic.
Lai’s speech revolved around connecting Taiwan with the ROC, uniting the Taiwanese, safeguarding democracy, resisting annexation, and sustaining peace and prosperity on both sides of the Strait. It should help Taiwan garner international support.
Michael Lin is a retired diplomat, formerly posted in the US.
Translated by Fion Khan
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence