President William Lai’s (賴清德) first Double Ten National Day address had two strategic goals.
For domestic affairs, the speech aimed to foster consensus on national identity, strengthen the country and unite the Taiwanese against a Chinese invasion.
In terms of cross-strait relations, the speech aimed to mitigate tensions in the Taiwan Strait and promote the coexistence and prosperity of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in China and the Republic of China (ROC).
Lai is taking a different stance from previous Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administrations on domestic political issues.
During his speech, he said: “The PRC could not be the motherland of the people of the ROC,” commemorating our forebears’ overthrowing of the imperial regime and the establishment of a democratic republic. He also mentioned the Battle of Guningtou 75 years ago, the Aug. 23 Artillery Battle 66 years ago, the Kaohsiung Incident 45 years ago and the democracy movement.
Lai compared Taiwan to the early ROC by saying that our forebears, like the Taiwanese of today, carried the dream of democracy and the ideal of freedom. This was meant to remind the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) of the democratic progress that Taiwan has made over time, from overthrowing the Qing government and the rise of anti-communist and pro-Taiwan ideologies to more recent parliamentary election reforms. The message is that we must unite against any attempt by China to invade Taiwan, and protect the nation’s sovereignty and liberal democratic system.
He encouraged unity among supporters of the ROC, “the ROC on Taiwan,” and Taiwan, with a macro-narrative of the country’s history that emphasized a shared dream of one Taiwan.
Lai vowed to promote the “five plus two” innovative industries plan and the “six core strategic industries” policy; develop Taiwan’s “five trusted industry sectors,” including semiconductors and artificial intelligence; and help expand their global presence to bolster the local economy.
He also promised to advance the “Healthy Taiwan Cultivation Plan,” build a stronger social safety net, improve care for the disadvantaged and elderly people, and fight housing speculation.
Lai’s emphasis on people’s livelihoods was a call for opposition parties to prioritize social well-being over power struggles and work with the DPP, so that the government can implement its agenda in the national interest.
On cross-strait relations, Lai stressed that the ROC and the PRC are not subordinate to each other and that China has no right to represent Taiwan. Lai also called for Beijing to live up to the international community’s expectations of being a positive force for global peace and prosperity, after everything the world has done to help lift up China.
Taiwan is willing to work with China in maintaining regional security, and pursuing peace and prosperity for the all people across the Strait, Lai said.
Lai also said he wanted to move beyond the constraints of the Strait and make his appeal from a wider international perspective. He stressed Taiwan’s role in maintaining world peace with its strategically important geopolitical position. His call for cross-strait cooperation on regional security aligns with the international community’s hope for peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region.
His attempt to de-escalate cross-strait tensions by suggesting “mutual assistance and mutual benefit” and the “coexistence and prosperity” of China and Taiwan was strategic.
Lai’s speech revolved around connecting Taiwan with the ROC, uniting the Taiwanese, safeguarding democracy, resisting annexation, and sustaining peace and prosperity on both sides of the Strait. It should help Taiwan garner international support.
Michael Lin is a retired diplomat, formerly posted in the US.
Translated by Fion Khan
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
To the dismay of the Chinese propaganda machine, President William Lai (賴清德) has been mounting an information offensive through his speeches. No longer are Taiwanese content with passively reacting to China’s encroachment in the international window of discourse, but Taiwan is now setting the tone and pace of conversation. Last month, Lai’s statement that “If China wants Taiwan it should also take back land from Russia” made international headlines, pointing out the duplicity of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) revanchism. History shows that the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) stance on regional territorial disputes has not been consistent. The early CCP