The 60-day comment period for proposed rules prohibiting 27 types of chemicals commonly used for flavored tobacco products ended on Monday last week and received more than 12,000 submissions.
The Ministry of Health and Welfare’s Health Promotion Administration (HPA) on March 22 last year proposed to ban additives to tobacco products that produce flavors such as flowers, fruit, chocolate and menthol, but the implementation was postponed after it received wide criticism.
The rules aimed to reduce smoking initiation in adolescents and young adults, the HPA said, citing studies that suggested that adolescents perceive flavored tobacco products as more appealing and less harmful than non-flavored tobacco products. However, nicotine is highly addictive and exposure can harm adolescents’ brain development.
The HPA’s survey in 2021 showed that 40 percent of adolescent smokers in Taiwan use flavored tobacco.
The HPA on Aug. 8 proposed to prohibit 27 types of additives, which could remove about half of the flavored cigarettes from the market. They include vanillin, maltol, ethyl maltol, benzaldehyde, menthol and heliotropin, which are commonly used for flavors such as vanilla, mint, chocolate, caramel and floral.
The proposed rules would be promulgated after comments are further discussed and finalized, and would take effect 18 months after promulgation. The manufacture, importation, presentation and sale of tobacco products containing the banned substances would be fined if the rules take effect.
An alliance of 206 groups again called for a blanket ban on all tobacco flavor additives and for the implementation to take effect sooner.
The alliance questioned why the ministry does not follow the EU, the US and other countries in banning “all” flavors, and some expressed concerns that tobacco companies might use other chemicals to create new flavors, resulting in the government forever chasing the latest products to prohibit.
The EU in 2014 passed the European Tobacco Products Directive, which prohibited the sale of cigarettes and roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco products that have characterizing flavors from May 20, 2016. After a four-year transitional period for flavors with more than a 3 percent market share, the ban on all flavored cigarettes and RYO tobaccos went into effect in May 2020, followed by a ban on flavored heated tobacco products in October last year.
The US in October 2009 also passed an act banning cigarettes with flavors other than menthol or tobacco, and in June last year it proposed to end the sale of menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars.
However, some expressed discontent about limiting smokers’ choices of flavors, while others said a few of the banned chemicals are also used in non-flavored cigarettes, that it would be a blow to the domestic companies that export flavored cigarettes or that a ban would lead to a flourishing black market.
With the considerable amount of comments the ministry received, in support and in opposition to, as well as concerns about the actual effects of the proposed rules, it is evident that it needs to communicate better with the public.
The ministry should explain why the 27 chemicals were specifically chosen and dispel concerns that they might encompass too many or too few flavored or non-flavored tobacco products. It should also demonstrate the feasibility of implementation, such as showing that the ministry has the capacity to test the chemicals when inspecting tobacco products on the market. Additionally, the issue could be included by the Healthy Taiwan Promotion Committee in cross-ministerial discussions to balance the health and economic impacts of the bans. If the ministry is worried that an immediate blanket ban, as proposed by anti-smoking groups, might trigger a pushback by the tobacco industry or smokers, it could also propose phases for gradual transition.
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
To the dismay of the Chinese propaganda machine, President William Lai (賴清德) has been mounting an information offensive through his speeches. No longer are Taiwanese content with passively reacting to China’s encroachment in the international window of discourse, but Taiwan is now setting the tone and pace of conversation. Last month, Lai’s statement that “If China wants Taiwan it should also take back land from Russia” made international headlines, pointing out the duplicity of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) revanchism. History shows that the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) stance on regional territorial disputes has not been consistent. The early CCP