Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Chen Hsueh-sheng (陳雪生) proposed amendments to allow the government, political parties and the military to indirectly invest in broadcast media.
The Radio and Television Act (廣播電視法), as well as the cable and satellite-specific versions of that act, each specify that politicians, the government and organizations affiliated with the government are not permitted to invest in the media.
Chen argued that indirect investments in broadcast media by the government and politicians should be permitted to allow “the media industry the opportunity to grow and prosper,” if those investments do not exceed 10 percent of a company’s value.
Yet as Taiwan Forever Association chairman and lawyer Huang Di-ying (黃帝穎) said, “holding 10 percent of a large firm could give a shareholder the power to influence its operation.”
Arguably, journalists at a media company partially owned by a politician or party would practice self-censorship, avoiding statements critical of that party.
However, even when the owners of a media company are not directly employed in politics, those owners could influence reporting and, by extension, politics. An article by the Journal of Politics at the University of Hamburg says that business magnate Rupert Murdoch, who owns various media companies in the US, has “exceptional political access.” In European countries including Turkey, Hungary and Italy, wealthy businesspeople have acquired media companies due to their relationships with those countries’ leaders. Leaders leverage those relationships to impact reporting about their administrations.
The issue is further complicated by the growing popularity of social media. An increasing number of people get their news from social media platforms, and those platforms are easier to acquire, have a wider reach, and are generally less regulated than broadcast media.
During his time in office, former US president Donald Trump was banned from Twitter, now X, for allegedly inciting violence. The platform has over 100 million users in the US alone. By banning Trump, it arguably could have impacted political views among the US public and potentially impacted the outcome of subsequent elections.
Billionaire founder of Tesla and SpaceX Elon Musk later bought the platform and renamed it X, before reinstating access for Trump and others. However, Musk has been subject to criticism since his takeover of the platform for, among other things, eliminating rules banning hate speech and disinformation.
Taiwan also has its own example of a wealthy media company owner very publicly supporting a political election candidate. In the lead-up to the 2020 presidential election, CTi News was fined after it dedicated more than 70 percent of its election coverage to then-KMT candidate Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜). CTi News, which has since had its license revoked, is owned by Want Want China Times Media Group founder Tsai Eng-meng (蔡衍明), who has publicly stated that he “cannot wait for unification” of Taiwan with China.
Political researcher Bill Sharp wrote in an editorial titled “A wolf stalks democratic Taiwan” on April 19, 2020, that Taiwan should establish a centralized regulatory organization, break up consolidation of media organizations, and create an enforceable media ethics code.
Since the end of martial law, Taiwan has become a “media free-for-all” susceptible to Chinese infiltration, and thus needs stricter regulation of broadcast, print and social media, he wrote.
Rather, the scope of existing laws should be expanded to more closely monitor and regulate journalistic ethics and better prevent the dissemination of disinformation. Greater transparency is also needed to ensure the public knows who is funding reporting.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
RSS