In democratic countries, the main role of opposition parties is to monitor, check and balance the government. When the central government’s annual budget drafted by the governing party was sent to the Legislative Yuan for review, lawmakers, in theory, can approve, reduce or delete parts of the proposal as needed.
If the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government does not secure the budget it needs, when problems arise, can the public be indifferent to the process by which their needs cannot be met? How can they not care and forget about it? In the next election, the ruling party would then be held accountable for its poor performance and could even lose votes.
If opposition lawmakers continue to block the annual budget by leveraging their legislative majority, the machinery of state could well come to a grinding halt. The opposition-dominated legislature would then be directing the Executive Yuan’s annual spending policy. Can this really be called the opposition monitoring the ruling DPP?
In countries that have three separate branches of government, the executive, legislative and judicial powers belong to their respective branches, with their own division of labor, responsibilities and authority. The situation in Taiwan is special in that it has two additional branches of government: the Examination Yuan and the Control Yuan. Before the two latter branches are formally abolished, we can only accept them, however reluctantly.
With their legislative majority, opposition lawmakers have been trying to downgrade the Executive Yuan to a subordinate unit of the Legislative Yuan, infringing on judicial power and grabbing supervisory power. Is this supervising the government or an attempt to expand their power?
The ruling DPP has chosen to stand with the US, Japan and democratic European countries, while the opposition parties have embraced communist China as “family,” are skeptical about the US and feel enmity toward Japan.
Following the first power transfer in 2000, the ruling DPP’s proposed weapons budget was blocked 69 times by opposition-dominated legislature, and plans to procure US submarines was aborted. Today, the ruling DPP is once again facing the same problem of an opposition-led legislature that is trying its best to hinder the ruling party and the nation’s indigenous submarine project. As the opposition parties block the ruling party’s arms procurement and submarine project that are meant to protect the country, this is clearly not a check and balance, but a blow to Taiwan’s national defense, putting the lives and properties of Taiwanese at risk.
As the opposition parties boycott the Executive Yuan’s budget proposal, intervene in the Judicial Yuan and even bully the Control Yuan, they are abusing and expanding their powers, not monitoring the ruling DPP. As they block the arms procurement and submarine project, they are showing how they favor China, are skeptical about the US and antagonistic toward Japan. They are the enemies of democracy, freedom and human rights, and are in no way practicing the principle of check and balance.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired National Hsinchu University of Education associate professor.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
RSS