All students across the globe want to reach academic success and apply their knowledge in their lives and jobs. After reading Yang Mien-chieh and Jonathan Chin’s article titled “2,527 students enroll in MOE’s AI programs,” which was published on the Taipei Times’ page 3 on Friday last week, and the research article Reimagining education: Bridging artificial intelligence, transhumanism, and critical pedagogy by researchers Funda Nayir, Tamer Sari and Aras Bozkurt, I have come to the conclusion that generative artificial intelligence (AI) is quite useful when it comes to helping students in their learning endeavors. Nevertheless, every tool that human beings have created comes with threats and opportunities.
The researchers said that generative AI raises worries that automation would result in job losses and difficulties such as incorrect judgements and prejudices. Nevertheless, generative AI might be a handy tool when it is used for educational purposes under the guidance of a teacher.
Teachers who are not yet familiar with generative AI tools can still show the basic steps to their students. As National Changhua Senior High School has opened a class teaching students how to use generative AI to conduct research and prepare for a debate, with an emphasis on developing the ability to critically assess information produced by algorithms, other teachers can follow suit and encourage their students to conduct research using AI. Using AI tools is not about students becoming lazy by giving them all the answers on a silver plate. On the contrary, it is about helping students finding new and original information.
The advantages of using generative AI are that students would find out that writing a research article is not as time consuming nor painstaking anymore, and that they can save time and do other important duties. That is to say, teachers need to show their students that generative AI tools can facilitate the research process and scaffold learning by doing more in-depth investigations to verify information and sources if needed.
According to educator Edgar Dale’s Cone of Experience, students need to have learning experiences that simulate “doing the real thing” and “are more effective than traditional methodologies.” Therefore, students who decide to enroll in a class need to show industriousness, which is a cornerstone of the Pyramid of Success. Industriousness consists of hard work and planning to reach a goal, both of which are needed for positive performance behavior. Intentness also consists of being determined and persistent. When students are using their “strengths,” they tend to become alive, and more communicative and excited about what they are doing.
When implemented properly, AI could serve as a beneficial assistive technology in education, allowing students to achieve their full potential or easing many educational processes.
David Blasco is a Ling Tung University assistant professor.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS