The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan was founded 113 years ago. The People’s Republic of China (PRC) in China on Oct. 1 marked its 75th anniversary. Based on age and chronology, the PRC cannot be considered the ROC’s “motherland.”
These were the facts President William Lai (賴清德) cited during his address at a Double Ten National Day gala in the Taipei Dome on Saturday to refute the fake motherland “mythconception.”
Lai was direct and to the point. The founding years of the countries differs significantly, they celebrate different national days and neither are subordinate to each other. The fake motherland concept, long disseminated by the pro-Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and pan-blue media, disappeared under the harsh sunlight cast by Lai’s logic.
The pan-blue Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on the one hand holds up China as the “motherland,” while at the same time claims that it wants to safeguard the ROC on Taiwan. The CCP leverages the KMT’s artifice by saying that China is the “motherland” and that the PRC is the only legitimate representative of China in the world.
The pan-blue camp’s insistence that China is the “motherland” is tantamount to recognizing the PRC as the “motherland,” essentially “acknowledging the bandit as one’s ancestor,” to borrow a Chinese euphemism (認賊作祖) for betraying one’s country to the enemy.
With the fake motherland betrayal so effortlessly exposed by the facts, representatives of the red and blue media immediately had a hissy fit, with people such as Broadcasting Corp of China chairman Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former KMT legislator Alex Tsai (蔡正元) and KMT think tank deputy director Ling Tao (凌濤) hitting the floor running with criticisms of Lai’s speech. Meanwhile, the pro-blue and red media, and the pro-CCP Internet army spewed out an endless stream of ad hominem attacks at Lai.
The more urgent, vitriolic and angry the attacks, the more they proved Lai to be right. They demonstrated his ability to cut through the lies and strike right at the heart of the disingenuous nature of the mudslingers’ protestations.
If they want to throw their lot in with the CCP’s “united front” fake motherland fabrication and in so doing sell out their own country, then so be it. That is their choice. However, even more shameless is that they are using this distortion to hoodwink Taiwanese, to extinguish their resolve to resist annexation by the CCP.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has recently allowed himself to be transformed into the CCP’s “united front” poster boy, casting suspicion on Lai and calling on Taiwanese to place their trust in Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), while doubting their own elected head of state.
That the PRC and the ROC are not subordinate to each other is not only borne out because of their founding dates, but is also based upon sovereignty, history and the right to govern.
Through its lies and poisonous rhetoric, the CCP has pulled out all the stops to kill off the ROC, which was not only founded long before the PRC, but still exists on Taiwan. People like Ma are CCP accomplices in this attempt.
Lai made the remarks about the PRC being a fake motherland because he hoped to bring together Taiwanese from both sides of the political divide in a call for unity in the name of patriotism. It is unfortunate that people such as Ma refuse to listen to the call.
Hu Wen-huei is a veteran journalist.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS