Disinformation — the deliberate spreading of false or biased news to manipulate minds — is gaining ground around the world.
As China and Russia sink into authoritarianism and export their methods of censorship and media control, democracies find themselves overwhelmed by an incessant flow of propaganda that threatens the integrity of their institutions.
Taiwan, ranked first for democracy in Asia according to the Economist Intelligence Unit, is also the country that is targeted most by disinformation originating abroad, in this case China, the independent research institute V-Dem said.
The only bulwark against disinformation is a free, independent and plural media, prioritizing the public interest and conditioning the information it publishes on systematic verification of its sources.
However, Taiwanese media, which operate in a relatively free environment (Taiwan ranks 27th out of 180 in Reporters Without Borders’ [RSF] world press freedom ranking this year), too often neglect journalistic ethics for political or commercial reasons. As a result, only three in 10 Taiwanese say they trust the media according to a Reuters Institute survey conducted in 2022, one of the lowest percentages among democracies.
This climate of distrust gives disproportionate influence to platforms, in particular Facebook and Line, despite them being a major vector of false or biased information.
This credibility deficit for traditional media, a real Achilles heel of Taiwanese democracy, puts it at risk of being exploited for malicious purposes, with potentially dramatic consequences.
However, despite the urgency, no major reform has yet seen the light of day. It is true that in Taiwan any public policy affecting the supervision of the media systematically exposes its authors to the easy accusation of a “return to dictatorship.”
On the contrary, such a reform, if it adopted a co-regulation approach, returning journalism practitioners to their responsibilities, could ensure that the media as a whole serves the general public interest rather than that of their shareholders.
We suggest five areas of reform which seem easy to implement and would have a lasting impact:
First, adopt a regulatory framework that encourages and protects the independence of editorial staff vis-a-vis their employers and their boards of directors.
Second, expand the mandate of the broadcast regulator, the National Communications Commission (NCC), to cover all media, including print, online news sites and platforms, and strengthen its independence and resources.
Third, significantly increase, and maintain, the budgets allocated to public media so that they can benefit from the same visibility as private media and strengthen their guarantees of independence.
Fourth, support media outlets that are committed to respecting journalistic ethics, independent fact-checking initiatives and projects that aim to strengthen dialogue with the public.
Fifth, impose on large digital platforms an obligation of discoverability and appropriate moderation of reliable information sources, identified as such on the basis of an independent certification.
As part of a RSF delegation to Taiwan from Monday next week through Friday, we expect to meet President William Lai (賴清德), government and opposition officials, as well as a wide range of media and civil society representatives.
In these meetings we would emphasize the need for such reforms and introduce innovative solutions developed by RSF that can facilitate them, in particular the Forum on Information and Democracy, a laboratory for developing good practices; the Journalism Trust Initiative, the first media platform to receive a International Organization for Standardization certification; the Paris Charter on artificial intelligence and journalism; and the Propaganda Monitor, an observatory recently launched to analyze misinformation from authoritarian regimes.
We are convinced that Taiwan, a regional leader in press freedom and the only democracy in the Chinese-speaking world, has everything to gain from reforming its media regulations so that they are in line with international best practices.
It is at this price that Taiwanese media would regain public trust, a necessity not only to combat disinformation, but also to guarantee their own long-term survival in the face of the social media platforms’ hegemony. The future of journalism is linked to that of democracy and vice versa.
Thibaut Bruttin is the director-general of Reporters Without Borders. Cedric Alviani is the director of RSF’s Asia-Pacific bureau.
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
RSS