Work and classes across the nation were canceled for two or three consecutive days last week, depending on the particular area, as Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southern Taiwan.
Typhoon days are controversial. Some think it affects productivity and the economy and therefore it would be preferable if calling a typhoon day would be made much more cautiously. Some think that a day off work and school brings a little joy, and it is not a big deal to do so.
Others say that typhoon days potentially deprive people requiring treatment of their right to receive medical care and students of their right to education. Some in the retail and service industries complain about “differential treatment,” as they do not get a day off even on a typhoon day.
The problem is that people’s opinions about typhoon days are often not based on whether they prevent disasters and casualties.
The above debate demonstrates that there is room for a rolling review of the typhoon day policy.
First, when deciding on whether to call a typhoon day, local governments should consider including an indicator of the potential harm a typhoon could bring.
Second, the government should provide support measures and eliminate unfair or unreasonable regulations.
It is not up to government heads to declare a typhoon day. Whether to cancel work and classes depends on if the predicted wind speed and rainfall meet the requirements.
As of 9pm Wednesday, there were two dead, two missing, and 102 injured, according to data provided by the Central Emergency Operation Center.
It is not clear if the casualties were related to the typhoon day policy. If so, the current policy should be maintained. Iif not, it should be amended, reviewed or canceled.
One of the dead was a truck driver whose vehicle collided with a large rock on the South Link Highway in Taimali Township (太麻里) at around 7pm on Monday last week. He was seriously injured and died three days later.
The Taitung County Government had already canceled work and classes by that time.
It is not clear if the driver was aware of the typhoon day announcement. It is also not clear that the cancellation was related to this incident, and whether there was any policy, either a deterrent or an incentive, that would have affected his decision to continue working.
The other person who died was a man in his 70s who fell to his death at about 11am on Tuesday while trimming a tree at his home in Shoufeng Township (壽豐).
Was his death related to the typhoon day policy? It is likely not. If this is the case, the authorities should improve their messaging to better inform the public about their policy decisions.
The scenarios in which these people died show that the declaration of a typhoon day is hardly relevant.
It is high time to review the policy on a rolling basis.
Yang Yung-nane is a professor of political science at National Cheng Kung University and an adviser to the Tainan City Government’s disaster prevention advisory cmmittee.
Translated by Fion Khan
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS