Typhoon cancelations
Veteran Japanese media personality Akio Yaita recently commented that there is no such thing as a typhoon day in Japan, because Japanese do not want to be seen as lazy. The country’s infrastructure is also well-built and public transportation always runs on time, so typhoons do not have much impact.
However, in Taiwan, many places do not have “mass rapid transit” systems, so many Taiwanese go to work by motorcycles. Many buildings are also old, so there is a danger of falling signs injuring passersby.
However, typhoon days should not be used as a “vote-buying tool” by politicians to curry favor with their voters. As Yaita questioned after experiencing several typhoon days with little wind and rain: Are such days off a good thing?
The strong winds and heavy rains brought by typhoons might cause damage to people and property. When the scale of a typhoon is projected to reach a certain level, it is certainly reasonable for the local city and county governments to announce the suspension of work and schools completely or conditionally. This kind of typhoon day seems to be legitimate and should not be abolished. However, the announcement of such days off should be strict and cautious in practice, so as to avoid announcing a day off when there is simply no need for one.
On Wednesday, Taipei, New Taipei, Keelung and Taoyuan in northern Taiwan were not even included in the warning areas when Typhoon Krathon hit southern Taiwan, and yet the four cities seized the chance to have a typhoon day, too.
Was there any political intention to please the public? The announcement of a typhoon day should not be based on political considerations.
It should be based mainly on the expert analysis of weather forecasts, while taking into account the geographic locations of cities and counties, their own landforms, and their relevance to neighboring cities and counties.
Then, they would be able to make the correct determination through collective decision-making, so that people can feel at ease and justified about taking the day off.
Chi An-hsiu
Taipei
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
Former Japanese minister of defense Shigeru Ishiba has been elected as president of the governing Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and would be approved as prime minister in parliament today. Ishiba is a familiar face for Taiwanese, as he has visited the nation several times. His popularity among Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers has grown as a result of his multiple meetings and encounters with legislators and prominent figures in the government. The DPP and the LDP have close ties and have long maintained warm relations. Ishiba in August 2020 praised Taiwan’s
On Thursday last week, the International Crisis Group (ICG) issued a well-researched report titled “The Widening Schism across the Taiwan Strait,” which focused on rising tensions between Taiwan and China, making a number of recommendations on how to avoid conflict. While it is of course laudable that a respected international organization such as the ICG is willing to think through possible avenues toward a peaceful resolution, the report contains a couple of fundamental flaws in the way it approaches the issue. First, it attempts to present a “balanced approach” by pushing back equally against Taiwan’s perceived transgressions as against Beijing’s military threats