On Tuesday, in Taipei’s Ximending shopping area, a group of Taiwanese and Hong Kongers were standing on a street corner holding a protest against China’s National Day celebration. They had banners and flags with the slogan “Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of our Times.”
Two Chinese tourists provoked a fight with the protesters, yelling: “Taiwan and Hong Kong belong to China,” tearing their flags and vandalizing the signage.
Democratic Progressive Party Taipei City Councilor Lin Yen-feng (林延鳳) said the two Chinese tourists provoked a fight, disparaging Taiwan’s democracy and rule of law. Lin urged Taipei police to act swiftly and investigate the matter.
Lin’s request is reasonable and has legal merit. Taiwan is a sovereign and independent nation with its own judicial, executive and legislative branches.
No one, including tourists, is allowed to disrupt public order or start fights.
These Chinese tourists lack an understanding of the principles of freedom of speech and expression, best stated by English writer Evelyn Beatrice Hall in her famous summary of Voltaire’s democratic philosophy: “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”
Chinese tourists have absolutely no right to limit the freedom of expression of Taiwanese or Hong Kongers, especially within Taiwan’s borders. When in Rome, do as the Romans do. What right do they have to go around picking fights and trying to halt the freedom of expression and speech of people who reside here?
Taiwan is a nation governed by the rule of law. These tourists were caught red-handed contravening the Criminal Code by obstructing and infringing on others’ liberties in their attempts to tear down and destroy others’ property.
As Lin said, troublemaker tourists such as this Chinese couple cannot be allowed to make a mockery of the rights enjoyed by the citizens of this country.
It is important that we show resolve in defending our democracy and rule of law.
Hu Wen-chi is the spokesperson of the People First Party.
Translated by Tim Smith
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
RSS