On Tuesday, in Taipei’s Ximending shopping area, a group of Taiwanese and Hong Kongers were standing on a street corner holding a protest against China’s National Day celebration. They had banners and flags with the slogan “Liberate Hong Kong, Revolution of our Times.”
Two Chinese tourists provoked a fight with the protesters, yelling: “Taiwan and Hong Kong belong to China,” tearing their flags and vandalizing the signage.
Democratic Progressive Party Taipei City Councilor Lin Yen-feng (林延鳳) said the two Chinese tourists provoked a fight, disparaging Taiwan’s democracy and rule of law. Lin urged Taipei police to act swiftly and investigate the matter.
Lin’s request is reasonable and has legal merit. Taiwan is a sovereign and independent nation with its own judicial, executive and legislative branches.
No one, including tourists, is allowed to disrupt public order or start fights.
These Chinese tourists lack an understanding of the principles of freedom of speech and expression, best stated by English writer Evelyn Beatrice Hall in her famous summary of Voltaire’s democratic philosophy: “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”
Chinese tourists have absolutely no right to limit the freedom of expression of Taiwanese or Hong Kongers, especially within Taiwan’s borders. When in Rome, do as the Romans do. What right do they have to go around picking fights and trying to halt the freedom of expression and speech of people who reside here?
Taiwan is a nation governed by the rule of law. These tourists were caught red-handed contravening the Criminal Code by obstructing and infringing on others’ liberties in their attempts to tear down and destroy others’ property.
As Lin said, troublemaker tourists such as this Chinese couple cannot be allowed to make a mockery of the rights enjoyed by the citizens of this country.
It is important that we show resolve in defending our democracy and rule of law.
Hu Wen-chi is the spokesperson of the People First Party.
Translated by Tim Smith
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS