With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization.
The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House.
Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time.
The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully ... trying not to sever all their connections ... and hoping that, once they have backed away from each other far enough, they can map a new route that will sustain the mutual benefits” that they have had over the past 25 years, he wrote in The New Cold War.
However, a bifurcated global trading system could negatively impact Taiwan’s economy. As a resource-poor and export-oriented economy, the nation relies on being integrated with global supply chains to grow and maintain its prosperity.
National Taipei University of Business professor Kuo Chun-chien (郭俊賢) looks at Taiwan’s place in the global economy in the context of a new cold war in “Economic Globalization Under a New Cold War: Taiwan’s Ambiguous and Critical Role” published in the Asian Economic Papers.
Increasing protectionism and US-China rivalry have posed challenges for Taiwan, particularly the 2018 US-China trade war and the US’ export controls on key technologies, Kuo said. However, Taiwan seems to have adapted well through these challenges, he said.
Taiwan’s trade with New Southbound Policy countries surged from US$96 billion in 2016 to US$180 billion in 2022, with total investments into these nations accounting for 35 percent of outward investment, exceeding investment in China, a shift resulting from the trade war and the policy’s promotion.
In addition, the Ministry of Economic Affairs launched an initiative to attract Taiwanese firms back from China, with a focus on high value-added investments. With returning firms experiencing an average production growth of 8.1 percent compared with overall manufacturing growth of 4.6, the promotion plan was extended for another three years due to its effectiveness.
With the US-Taiwan Initiative on 21st Century Trade agreement under negotiation, the possibility that other countries could sign similar agreements with Taiwan and the potential for the nation to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, Taiwan’s trade with the US and other allies could increase, offsetting the reduction of trade with China.
Taiwan’s centrality to the global economy can also ensure that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) thinks twice about invading, Kuo said.
Taiwan controls 40 percent of global chip production and manufactures 92 percent of advanced semiconductors. These chips — used in everything from smartphones and laptops to data centers and artificial intelligence servers — are crucial to the functioning of modern society. A conflict over Taiwan would cost the world US$10 trillion, causing a 10.2 percent drop in global GDP, far surpassing the 5.9 percent decline caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, Bloomberg Economics estimates showed.
Increasing protectionism is not ideal for trading nations such as Taiwan and it especially harms global growth and prosperity. However, in these circumstances, Taiwan so far has shown the flexibility and capability to adapt to a changing world system.
With its critical role in the global economy, leadership in advanced technologies, and if the US and China carefully manage their competition, Taiwan can continue to thrive in a shifting global trading system, while ensuring that cold war II stays cold.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS