We have heard a great deal about so-called “real Americans” in this presidential campaign.
It was a theme of this summer’s Republican National Convention, where speakers such as retired professional wrestler Hulk Hogan and UFC CEO Dana White used the phrase to praise former US president Donald Trump and his supporters. More recently, Trump and his running mate, US Senator JD Vance, have focused on those they deem not to be real Americans, including Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, who they have falsely described as “illegal aliens” (and baselessly accused of eating pets).
Trump has leaned on this type of rhetoric since he first emerged on the political stage spouting spurious claims that former US president Barack Obama was not born in the US. After enduring it for years, it is hard for many to muster a sense of shock.
Yet perhaps we should react more strongly, given where this language originated. The Trump campaign did not invent the idea of a “real American,” much less the slander that goes along with it. Instead, credit for that dubious deed goes to a group no normal politician would claim as an intellectual influence: the Ku Klux Klan.
It is a truism that the US is a nation of immigrants, but this was especially the case in the early 20th century. Between 1900 and 1914, close to 1 million newcomers arrived in places such as Ellis Island. This meant that each year, one immigrant arrived for every 100 Americans — a high number relative to historical averages (and much higher than the current annual statistic: roughly one new immigrant arrives for every 200 Americans).
Most of the new arrivals came from places that had not sent many migrants in the past: the shtetls of eastern Europe, poor farming villages in Italy and Greece, and other areas distant from Great Britain, Scandinavia and Germany — all sources of earlier waves. Most of the newcomers were Catholics, Jews and other faiths distant from Protestantism.
Their arrival occasioned considerable handwringing among native-born Americans, who feared that these foreigners would overrun the nation’s white, Anglo-Saxon population. Former US president Theodore Roosevelt, for example, fretted that his fellow white, Anglo-Saxon Protestants were on the verge of committing “race suicide.” Still, Roosevelt believed, as he noted in a speech in 1917, that if someone was loyal to the US, “then no matter where he was born, he is just as good an American as anyone else.”
Members of the Ku Klux Klan thought otherwise. This secret society, born in the wake of the Civil War, played a central role in destroying reconstruction and disenfranchising black Americans through lynchings and other terrorist tactics. Although the group receded from public view in the 1880s, it experienced a major revival in the 1920s in response to the record levels of immigration.
This new Klan still dressed in hoods and burned crosses, and it certainly did not hide its ugly past. A typical appeal to “every real American” had the Klan bragging of its “valiant service in behalf of White supremacy.” Still, although old-fashioned racism remained a bedrock belief for Klan members, it was the group’s new anti-immigrant stance that fueled its explosive growth in states as far afield as Indiana, California and Oregon.
With Klan 2.0 no longer a Southern thing, it welcomed anyone in the US who qualified as a “real American” — meaning “no foreign connections, either religiously or politically.” The Klan’s national magazine, the American Standard, thus called upon “every patriot, every real American in the nation, to unite with us in our nation-wide campaign to get every white, Gentile, native-born Protestant of the nations to the polls in November…”
The hate group likewise argued for the deportation of Jews, Catholics and others it viewed as irredeemably alien. As the American Standard put it, the Klan wanted “all orientalism, alienism, un-Americanism driven forever from our shores, and sent to the place of its origins.” Long before Trump declared that migrants were “poisoning the blood of our country,” the Klan advocated the deportation of “anti-Christian Jewry from the United States entirely, thus withdrawing the poison from the American body politic.”
The Klan anticipated our present moment in other ways as well. Outside of its imagined community of “real Americans,” the group said that while immigrants might be “residents of America … mentally they are alien. This is because they think, work and play in terms of alien tongues, alien customs and alien standards. Consequently, they are aliens, not Americans, whether they possess citizenship papers or not.” It is a sentiment Vance channeled last week when he insisted on describing Haitians in Ohio “illegal aliens,” despite their legal right to be there.
The rhetoric of the “real American” has always done more than insult and degrade; it can also become a means of intimidation. In the 1920s, for example, it was wielded to wage economic warfare against immigrants. As historian Linda Gordon said in her history of the Klan, the group pressured native-born shopkeepers to place placards that read “Real American” in their windows to facilitate boycotts of businesses owned by immigrants.
Nonetheless, these efforts provoked, as they have in our own time, efforts to reclaim a more expansive definition of the term. Jews, Catholics and others sympathetic to immigrants pushed back, claiming that they, not the Klan, were the “real Americans.”
As one rabbi said in a speech attacking the Klan: “We want no terrorism in America. We want law and order. This is the standpoint of the Jews, as well as every real American citizen.”
So, too, in the year 2024. Anyone who claims the “real American” label as a way of denying legitimacy to those whose families arrived here more recently deserves denunciation and political defeat in November.
Stephen Mihm, a professor of history at the University of Georgia, is coauthor of Crisis Economics: A Crash Course in the Future of Finance.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS