On Sept. 18, the same day a group of travel industry representatives from the Xiamen Tourism Association visited Kinmen County for a “familiarization tour,” the Chinese Ministry of Finance abruptly announced that 34 Taiwanese agricultural products — including fresh fruit, vegetables and aquatic products that were originally exempt from tariffs — would no longer be eligible under the exemption policy from Wednesday last week.
China’s policy change came at an extremely sensitive time. While preparing to open up cross-strait tourism, it simultaneously announced limits on imports of Taiwanese agricultural products. This is clearly a two-pronged strategy.
China’s implementation of the tariff exemptions in 2005 provided more sales channels for Taiwanese agricultural products, but unilaterally terminating the agreement would undoubtedly significant affect Taiwanese farmers.
It is clear that China initially viewed the policy as an act of “goodwill,” but has now maliciously retracted it. The underlying reason is clear. Unfortunately, a new variable in cross-strait relations has emerged, as China easily applies political ideology to all cross-strait interactions.
Sports and healthcare are the most obvious examples, but even religious activities have not been spared. Even livelihood projects are being politicized. It is clear that China’s interactions with Taiwan are only driven by political considerations — all else are merely means to reach their goal.
Therefore, shifting the main focus of agricultural exports should be a top priority. The quality of Taiwanese agricultural products is perfectly evident. In the past few years, the Ministry of Agriculture has worked to expand exports and establish more international high-end markets, gradually moving away from dependence on Chinese markets.
Beijing’s policy shift should help the majority of Taiwanese understand its ideology: “Goodwill” is nothing but a facade. Only by maintaining a firm stance and responding appropriately can Taiwan avoid being affected by China’s every move and policy shift. This way, Taiwan can gradually gain its footing on the international stage.
Li Kuan-long is a lecturer at Shih Chien University’s Kaohsiung campus.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS