On Sept. 18, the same day a group of travel industry representatives from the Xiamen Tourism Association visited Kinmen County for a “familiarization tour,” the Chinese Ministry of Finance abruptly announced that 34 Taiwanese agricultural products — including fresh fruit, vegetables and aquatic products that were originally exempt from tariffs — would no longer be eligible under the exemption policy from Wednesday last week.
China’s policy change came at an extremely sensitive time. While preparing to open up cross-strait tourism, it simultaneously announced limits on imports of Taiwanese agricultural products. This is clearly a two-pronged strategy.
China’s implementation of the tariff exemptions in 2005 provided more sales channels for Taiwanese agricultural products, but unilaterally terminating the agreement would undoubtedly significant affect Taiwanese farmers.
It is clear that China initially viewed the policy as an act of “goodwill,” but has now maliciously retracted it. The underlying reason is clear. Unfortunately, a new variable in cross-strait relations has emerged, as China easily applies political ideology to all cross-strait interactions.
Sports and healthcare are the most obvious examples, but even religious activities have not been spared. Even livelihood projects are being politicized. It is clear that China’s interactions with Taiwan are only driven by political considerations — all else are merely means to reach their goal.
Therefore, shifting the main focus of agricultural exports should be a top priority. The quality of Taiwanese agricultural products is perfectly evident. In the past few years, the Ministry of Agriculture has worked to expand exports and establish more international high-end markets, gradually moving away from dependence on Chinese markets.
Beijing’s policy shift should help the majority of Taiwanese understand its ideology: “Goodwill” is nothing but a facade. Only by maintaining a firm stance and responding appropriately can Taiwan avoid being affected by China’s every move and policy shift. This way, Taiwan can gradually gain its footing on the international stage.
Li Kuan-long is a lecturer at Shih Chien University’s Kaohsiung campus.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS