On Sept. 18, the same day a group of travel industry representatives from the Xiamen Tourism Association visited Kinmen County for a “familiarization tour,” the Chinese Ministry of Finance abruptly announced that 34 Taiwanese agricultural products — including fresh fruit, vegetables and aquatic products that were originally exempt from tariffs — would no longer be eligible under the exemption policy from Wednesday last week.
China’s policy change came at an extremely sensitive time. While preparing to open up cross-strait tourism, it simultaneously announced limits on imports of Taiwanese agricultural products. This is clearly a two-pronged strategy.
China’s implementation of the tariff exemptions in 2005 provided more sales channels for Taiwanese agricultural products, but unilaterally terminating the agreement would undoubtedly significant affect Taiwanese farmers.
It is clear that China initially viewed the policy as an act of “goodwill,” but has now maliciously retracted it. The underlying reason is clear. Unfortunately, a new variable in cross-strait relations has emerged, as China easily applies political ideology to all cross-strait interactions.
Sports and healthcare are the most obvious examples, but even religious activities have not been spared. Even livelihood projects are being politicized. It is clear that China’s interactions with Taiwan are only driven by political considerations — all else are merely means to reach their goal.
Therefore, shifting the main focus of agricultural exports should be a top priority. The quality of Taiwanese agricultural products is perfectly evident. In the past few years, the Ministry of Agriculture has worked to expand exports and establish more international high-end markets, gradually moving away from dependence on Chinese markets.
Beijing’s policy shift should help the majority of Taiwanese understand its ideology: “Goodwill” is nothing but a facade. Only by maintaining a firm stance and responding appropriately can Taiwan avoid being affected by China’s every move and policy shift. This way, Taiwan can gradually gain its footing on the international stage.
Li Kuan-long is a lecturer at Shih Chien University’s Kaohsiung campus.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS