On Sept. 18, the same day a group of travel industry representatives from the Xiamen Tourism Association visited Kinmen County for a “familiarization tour,” the Chinese Ministry of Finance abruptly announced that 34 Taiwanese agricultural products — including fresh fruit, vegetables and aquatic products that were originally exempt from tariffs — would no longer be eligible under the exemption policy from Wednesday last week.
China’s policy change came at an extremely sensitive time. While preparing to open up cross-strait tourism, it simultaneously announced limits on imports of Taiwanese agricultural products. This is clearly a two-pronged strategy.
China’s implementation of the tariff exemptions in 2005 provided more sales channels for Taiwanese agricultural products, but unilaterally terminating the agreement would undoubtedly significant affect Taiwanese farmers.
It is clear that China initially viewed the policy as an act of “goodwill,” but has now maliciously retracted it. The underlying reason is clear. Unfortunately, a new variable in cross-strait relations has emerged, as China easily applies political ideology to all cross-strait interactions.
Sports and healthcare are the most obvious examples, but even religious activities have not been spared. Even livelihood projects are being politicized. It is clear that China’s interactions with Taiwan are only driven by political considerations — all else are merely means to reach their goal.
Therefore, shifting the main focus of agricultural exports should be a top priority. The quality of Taiwanese agricultural products is perfectly evident. In the past few years, the Ministry of Agriculture has worked to expand exports and establish more international high-end markets, gradually moving away from dependence on Chinese markets.
Beijing’s policy shift should help the majority of Taiwanese understand its ideology: “Goodwill” is nothing but a facade. Only by maintaining a firm stance and responding appropriately can Taiwan avoid being affected by China’s every move and policy shift. This way, Taiwan can gradually gain its footing on the international stage.
Li Kuan-long is a lecturer at Shih Chien University’s Kaohsiung campus.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS