At the 23rd annual US-Taiwan Defense Industry Conference last week, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) attended the event in place of party Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who has been detained due to his alleged involvement in several corruption cases.
However, Huang had already resigned from the TPP’s Central Standing Committee, which also suspended her for three years and removed her from the committee’s party caucus.
The TPP was at a loss for what to do, radio talk show host Huang Wei-han (黃暐瀚) said.
The party responded by saying that Huang remains a party member and legislator, so there is nothing wrong with her standing in for Ko at the conference, urging others not to make a fuss.
What is the point of her suspension if she is allowed to handle the party’s business and represent the party at a conference abroad?
Of course Huang is a party member and legislator. The problem is she has been suspended. She has no right to participate in the party’s affairs, so how is she allowed to stand in for the party’s chairman in an official visit abroad and at an important meeting? What is the point of her suspension?
Although this is an internal affair for the TPP, which outsiders are not supposed to interfere with, it is the second-largest opposition party in Taiwan. It is also a public body that is subject to public scrutiny.
As the saying goes, “there are national laws and family rules.” That also applies to a party that is supposed to have its own system and rules.
If a party member is suspended, the member is prohibited from participating in any of its affairs, including representing its chairperson at a meeting. Yet, the TPP still did so even though it was fully aware that it did not make any sense, arguing that Huang is still a party member. If it is not sophistry, then what is?
Allowing a suspended party member to represent the chairman is not only confusing to outsiders, but also controversial for party members. Why does the TPP invite all these troubles?
Allowing a suspended party member to represent the party chairman has exposed another serious problem: the lack of talent in the party.
Why does it have to be Huang who attends the conference? It could have been TPP caucus whip Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), TPP Secretary-General Chou Yu-hsiu (周榆修) or former TPP legislator Tsai Pi-ru (蔡壁如). Some other TPP legislators or local officials would have been a better choice than Vivian Huang.
The TPP has had to elaborate on what a suspended member can and cannot do, which is embarrassing and chaotic.
A party member being suspended is like a citizen being disenfranchised, which means they are not allowed to vote. Despite suspending Vivian Huang, the TPP gave her the right to represent its chairman. It is illogical, unreasonable and hardly convincing. It is just a trick to cover up the party’s incompetence.
Tsai Jr-keng is retired elementary-school principal.
Translated by Fion Khan
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS