Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) at the end of last month approved the allocation of a record NT$647 billion (US$20.42 billion), about 2.5 percent of GDP, for defense spending for fiscal year 2025. The premier also approved a submarine development project to build seven vessels from next year to 2038, which is estimated to cost NT$284 billion.
While the legislature’s Procedure Committee on Tuesday voted against scheduling a debate on the budget, opposition legislators said the reason was due to items omitted by the Cabinet, such as increasing logging compensation for indigenous people. However, the submarine program was not raised as an objection.
Once the budget does reach the Procedure Committee, legislators are expected to hotly debate funding the program, as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party have signaled significant reservations about supporting the project due to its projected timeline for completion, costs and appropriateness for the nation’s defense strategy.
Opposition lawmakers, such as KMT Legislator Ma Wen-chun (馬文君), have said that while they are willing to support defense spending increases, the submarine program needs further scrutiny. The government is seeking budget approval for seven additional submarines, even though the Hai Kun (海鯤), or “Narwhal,” which is the prototype the other models would be based on, is still undergoing sea tests and would not be delivered until November next year.
However, the government said it is seeking long-term funding for the project to ensure stability so contractors would commit to the project, adding that legislators who are threatening to vote down the program threaten its long-term viability.
The ministry “seeks to provide certainty and signals that the plan would not change regardless of developments at the Legislative Yuan or political circumstances,” said Lin Ying-yu (林穎佑), an assistant professor of international affairs and strategic studies at Tamkang University.
However, legislators such as Ma have also questioned the strategic soundness of committing so much money to procure an outdated, symmetric technology when asymmetric and more agile platforms such as uncrewed systems might be more effective in defending the nation.
This is a view shared by many defense analysts.
Taiwan should learn lessons from Ukraine’s fight against Russia and build an “anti-navy,” Jared McKinney and Reiss Oltman said in a recent opinion article for Nikkei Asia.
Ukraine has succeeded in destroying much of Russia’s vaunted Black Sea fleet “without a submarine and at a cost of much less than US$8 billion” through a “mosquito fleet” of asymmetric platforms, such B-2 drones, Neptune anti-ship missiles, Harpoon anti-ship missiles and uncrewed submarine vehicles, they said.
Taiwan’s money would be better spent in funding thousands of smaller platforms, creating a “decentered force” that could be procured quickly, rather than a handful of vulnerable symmetric platforms that are not scheduled to be ready until the end of the next decade, they added.
However, defense experts such as Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) still say the submarine program would be an important addition to the nation’s defense capabilities, especially in shutting off the Bashi Strait or Miyako Strait and preventing enemy aircraft carriers from encircling Taiwan in the event of an attack. The submarines could also be used to break through a blockade.
It remains to be seen if the budget is passed or in what form, but so long as criticisms are made in good faith and discussions set aside partisan politics, with the national interest and strategic clarity firmly in mind, debate over the submarine program is an example of a healthy democracy at work.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS