Japan might still be grappling with the far-reaching consequences of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, but the politicians vying to be its next leader agree on one thing: The country needs more atomic power.
The ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) would choose its new chief this week, who would also become prime minister. Most of the nine hopefuls have signaled their support for the clean power source to boost energy security and slash emissions in the fossil-fuel dependent economy.
The near-unanimous support would be welcome news for a sector that has faced years of uncertainty, and for Japan’s most powerful business lobby, whose chairman identified the nation’s energy issues as a priority in the leadership contest. It also reflects the global renaissance that nuclear power is enjoying, as countries look to it to ensure rising electricity demand can be met without further warming the planet.
“I used to believe we don’t need nuclear power,” said Japanese Minister for Digital Transformation Kono Taro, who is running for LDP chief, adding that “I changed my policy a little bit. We need to allow nuclear power plants to supply” artificial intelligence (AI) and data centers amid forecasts for higher energy requirements.
Boosting atomic power — which used to account for about a quarter of Japan’s power mix but is now down to 6 percent — would not be an easy task for the next leader. They would have to satisfy a public that is skeptical of its benefits and face stringent safety standards imposed after the 2011 meltdown, which have slowed the restarting of idled reactors.
Nuclear power remains sensitive in Japan, especially since the earthquake and tsunami that overwhelmed reactors at Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in 2011, causing the worst nuclear accident since Chernobyl. The country is still struggling with the clean-up of radioactive material, a process expected to cost ¥23 trillion (US$159.3 billion).
While the energy source has gained popularity over the past few years, a survey conducted by Japanese newspaper Asahi Shimbun in February showed 50 percent of respondents support restarting idle reactors, while 35 percent are opposed.
Of the country’s 33 remaining reactors, 21 are offline.
The effort to restart more reactors was dealt a blow this year when Japan’s nuclear watchdog said that the Tsuruga No. 2 reactor did not meet regulatory standards due to a potentially active earthquake fault line underneath. That means the reactor essentially cannot receive approval to restart.
Frontrunners in the LDP election, former Japanese minister of environment Shinjiro Koizumi and Japanese Minister of State for Economic Security Sanae Takaichi, have argued the time might be right for a nuclear comeback. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and subsequent surge in commodity prices have renewed concerns over energy security in the resource-poor nation.
Koizumi, who was involved in setting stricter climate goals in 2021, has questioned the country’s persistent reliance on fossil fuels. The nation’s latest energy strategy aims for nuclear power to make up 20 percent to 22 percent of the power mix by 2030.
“We pay 20 trillion yen every year to overseas,” Koizumi said. “We need to stop that as much as possible.”
Takaichi has also stressed Japan’s need to address its lack of energy independence. She proposed using next-generation technology including small modular reactors in the latter half of this decade, and nuclear fusion in 2030s.
Another candidate, seasoned politician Shigeru Ishiba, initially said Japan should reduce its dependence on atomic energy and focus on renewable sources like geothermal.
He later clarified he would support reusing existing nuclear plants if safe.
The latest poll of public opinion, including LDP members and lawmakers, suggests a three-way race between Koizumi, Takaichi and Ishiba.
Alongside all the talk of nuclear power, environmentalists say Japan must also prioritize renewables if it is to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. Among its G7 peers, Japan remains the most reliant on fossil fuels, which accounted for more than 70 percent of its total mix in 2022, while renewables made up a fifth.
“Driving forward with gas expansion and other fossil fuels risks undermining Japan’s international reputation, and also its economic growth,” said Susanne Wong, Asia program manager at advocacy group Oil Change International.
The leadership contest coincides with Japan’s review of its national energy strategy, which will outline what its power mix will look like beyond 2030. The nation should also revise its nationally determined contribution to set 2035 emissions reduction targets under the Paris Agreement.
With the candidates largely aligned on nuclear power, its role is expected to be cemented in Japan’s future energy policy.
How the country chooses to power its US$4 trillion economy is “as much a societal question as it is an economic question,” Center for Strategic and International Studies Jane Nakano said. “But economic security and competitiveness should be a key element in how the next Japanese prime minister approaches energy and decarbonization policymaking.”
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s