Scientists have pieced together enough clues to Earth’s past climate to graph the average temperature from 485 million years ago to the present — back to a time long before dinosaurs and even trees, when the land was either barren or hosted mostly moss, millipedes and primitive insects. This new work shows temperatures spent hundreds of millions of years bouncing up and down, from climates similar to ours to ones that were steamier by about 15°C.
Earlier attempts to chart our planet’s ancient climate suggested vastly hotter average temperatures — 30°C above today’s — that gradually cooled. The new analysis, published last week in Science, instead shows a series of extreme oscillations but no overall trend.
That complex plants and animals survived all those fluctuations — that extreme temperature swings might even be a normal part of Earth’s history — does not let us off the hook for human-caused climate change. The current climate crisis is unfolding too quickly for many species to adapt. There were similarly abrupt temperature upswings millions of years ago, and the result was mass death.
Illustration: Mountain People
The new research covers a period called the Phanerozoic Eon. The name is derived from the Greek for visible life. It marked the period when living things left fossils of shells and later bones, wood and leaves. The fossils show a time of dramatic changes. About 375 million years ago, fish dragged themselves out of the water on proto-limbs to become the first land vertebrates. The continents became forested about 350 million years ago, and dinosaurs emerged about 240 million years ago, dying out suddenly 65 million years back.
Looking back over the long course of time can help scientists understand how Earth’s climate works and what factors make a planet habitable.
“Very large swings in climate are the norm for this planet, and they have been driven very clearly by changes in carbon dioxide concentration,” said Benjamin Mills, a biogeochemist at the University of Leeds, who wrote a commentary piece on the findings for Science.
However, the swings have never been big enough to destroy life entirely. Venus, by contrast, might once have been temperate, but got hotter and hotter until it was an uninhabitable blast furnace.
Knowing how Earth’s temperature behaved deep in the past can also help scientists test climate models that predict the future.
“The only way we can test if these models can actually properly represent what happens when climate gets hot is to compare them to these examples from the paleo record,” Mills said.
The new analysis shows Earth repeatedly jumped between a sweltering 30°C state, known as a greenhouse, and the cooler state, about 15°C, known as the ice house.
“Right now, we’re actually in an ice-house Earth,” said Jessica Tierney, a paleoclimatologist at the University of Arizona and a coauthor of the paper.
Our average temperature is about 15°C and, for now, there is still thick ice on Greenland and Antarctica.
Tierney and her colleagues created the new graph using a combination of clues. The most important comes from the ratio of ordinary oxygen to its heavier isotope, called oxygen 18. The amount of oxygen 18 incorporated into minerals and fossils depends on temperature. Any given sample would record a local temperature, but with enough samples from different latitudes, it is possible to estimate a global average.
Scientists long knew about past hot spells from the fossil record, which showed that crocodiles had once roamed the Arctic and palm trees thrived in Antarctica. That record also shows periods where the diversity of life suddenly collapsed.
The worst mass extinction event happened about 250 million years ago, when an estimated 70 percent of land species and 90 percent of marine species were snuffed out. The primary culprit was a series of volcanic eruptions that caused carbon dioxide levels to spike. Another paper published earlier this month in Science re-examined that deadly hot spell and attributed some of the dying to a tipping point in ocean currents, like a giant El Nino event that accelerated the rate of heating.
It was not the extent of the heat that wiped out species. Life’s diversity can flourish in a climate 15°C hotter than it is today. The die-offs happen when the Earth’s temperature changes too rapidly for organisms to evolve and adapt — as is starting to happen now.
The one small reassurance is that the average temperature, even in the worst of times, never gets much above 30°C or below 10°C. The scientific explanation involves feedback loops. A warming Earth is ice-free and much wetter, exposing more rocks. Over hundreds of thousands of years, those rocks weather, a process that sequesters carbon dioxide and cools the planet. As it gets colder, ice covers those rocks once again, the rock-weathering stops, and atmospheric carbon starts to build up once more.
That cycle is keeping our planet alive and would continue to do so for millions of years, though it would not do anything to save humanity from the trouble created by its carbon emissions. Other species are already being pushed to the brink by human activity, from polar bears to coral reefs to wild salmon. The next half a million years might be in the hands of Mother Earth, but the coming decades are in ours.
F.D. Flam is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering science. She is host of the Follow the Science podcast. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s