The central bank kept its policy rates unchanged at its quarterly board meeting on Thursday — with the discount rate, the rate on refinancing of secured loans and the rate on temporary accommodations held at 2 percent, 2.375 percent and 4.25 percent respectively. That aligns with market expectations, despite the US Federal Reserve’s 50 basis-point rate cut, while several other central banks have been pursuing monetary easing.
However, the bank raised the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) by 25 basis points, effective on Tuesday next week, and further adjusted selective credit control measures, which took effect on Friday, as it aims to contain housing market speculation and property hoarding, while preventing the excessive flow of bank credit into the real-estate market.
The RRR hike follows a similar action in June and is expected to reduce liquidity in the banking sector by NT$125 billion (US$3.9 billion), while further tightening selective credit control measures — including applying more stringent loan-to-value (LTV) ratios on different types of housing loans and expanding restrictions nationwide. Market watchers view the moves as the most severe ever, signaling the central bank’s grave concerns over the real-estate market as housing transactions continue to climb and property prices have risen to the highest level since the second half of last year.
There is no question that the central bank is stepping up efforts to cool the real-estate market after the ratio of mortgages to banks’ total loans — a measure of the concentration of real-estate loans in the banking sector — rose to 37.5 percent at the end of last month. That is near its peak of 37.9 percent in October 2009 and higher than the central bank’s target of 35 to 36 percent.
Together with moral suasion, LTV ratio adjustments and a sequential RRR hike, the central bank has adopted a comprehensive strategy to slow the growth of real-estate loans and prevent an asset bubble burst — such as what happened in Japan in the 1990s or the US subprime mortgage crisis in 2008 and 2009 — which could lead to financial turmoil and an economic slowdown. In the Japanese and US cases, some people generally believed that the market was efficient and would automatically adjust itself after reaching a certain point, but it did not and the markets eventually collapsed.
An important message from the central bank is that despite homebuyers’ complaints about loan restrictions, it has to take serious measures to pre-empt any threat to the nation’s financial and economic health. More importantly, the central bank does not want lenders and investors to assume that a real-estate boom is sustainable, as the market could collapse suddenly if reckless lending and irrational investing prevail.
Another message from the central bank’s latest policy decisions is that it would decouple from the Fed going forward, as Taiwan’s monetary policymaker is determined to cool down the domestic real-estate market, while its US counterpart is starting a rate-cut cycle in hopes of a soft landing for its economy. While the central bank expects inflation to fall below its 2 percent alert level next year, it would cut interest rates only if inflation drops below 1.5 percent, it said.
Against this backdrop, local lenders must either cut back on their real-estate lending or expand their non-real-estate portfolios to avoid raising eyebrows at the central bank. People could expect the property market to undergo transaction and price corrections in the near term without worries of a hard landing.
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
After the confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday last week, John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, discussed this shocking event in an interview. Describing it as a disaster “not only for Ukraine, but also for the US,” Bolton added: “If I were in Taiwan, I would be very worried right now.” Indeed, Taiwanese have been observing — and discussing — this jarring clash as a foreboding signal. Pro-China commentators largely view it as further evidence that the US is an unreliable ally and that Taiwan would be better off integrating more deeply into
RSS