As summer in the northern hemisphere draws to a close, hundreds of temperature records have been broken, and there is a roughly 95 percent chance that this year would beat last year as the hottest year since measurements began. However, millions of people do not need data to tell them that — they are living through it.
The US last year experienced 28 climate-related disasters that each caused at least US$1 billion worth of damage, while China experienced extreme heat and devastating floods, with a typhoon displacing more than 120,000 people in Beijing.
It is clear that warming is occurring faster than expected, and that the world needs to pull an emergency brake on rising temperatures. China and the US, as global superpowers, could work together to drive change, and they recently held a high-level meeting to discuss opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
As these conversations continue ahead of this year’s UN Climate Change Conference (COP29) and into next year, they should focus on dealing with the climate crisis that has already arrived. To address it requires increased efforts to mitigate emissions of super pollutants, which are responsible for more than half of climate change.
Super pollutants, specifically warming agents such as methane, nitrous oxide, tropospheric ozone and hydrofluorocarbons are tens, hundreds or even thousands of times more potent than carbon dioxide per tonne.
Methane is a GHG that is roughly 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide over a 20-year period and contributes to ozone smog. However, it remains in the atmosphere for only about a decade, whereas carbon dioxide can last centuries. This means that reducing methane emissions is the fastest and most effective way to fight climate change and improve air quality.
Cleaner air is especially important for communities living or working near cattle farms, oil and gas infrastructure, landfills and other pollution sources. Deteriorating air quality has become a pressing public health problem, and reducing methane levels in the atmosphere would lower rates of death and asthma, and lessen the severity of wildfires, flooding, hurricanes and other extreme weather events.
The good news is that there are ways to cut methane emissions by as much as 45 percent, which could reduce warming by 0.3°C by 2040, bolster energy and food security, and put the world on a path to a healthier future.
In addition to the broad public support for government intervention to address methane emissions, there is also global consensus on the need to address non-carbon dioxide GHGs. To date, 158 countries have signed the Global Methane Pledge to cut emissions by 30 percent by 2030. At last year’s COP28 in Dubai, countries agreed to submit updated 2035 emissions reduction targets, known as nationally determined contributions (NDCs), that are economy-wide, cover all GHGs and are aligned with limiting global warming to 1.5°C.
Increased global attention to non-carbon dioxide GHGs could not come at a better time, as updated NDCs are due in February next year.
While NDCs contain meaningful carbon dioxide reduction targets, they often lack concrete, measurable goals for cutting super pollutants. Countries must recognize that this approach does not fully address the fight against climate change and raise their ambitions accordingly.
Strong 2035 targets for methane and other super pollutants are necessary to achieve net zero GHG emissions by 2050 and would reduce potentially irreversible planetary changes.
Methane has historically been hard to track, making it difficult to include specific targets in NDCs. However, after addressing critical funding and technology gaps, methane-detecting satellites are improving data collection. Satellite programs launched after the previous NDC update, including MethaneSAT, Carbon Mapper and the WasteMAP, have helped local authorities pinpoint and address emissions sources. Given these developments, there is no excuse for submitting NDCs without methane targets.
China and the US can build on the climate commitments they made in last year’s Sunnylands Statement by including robust super pollutant targets in their updated NDCs. The Chinese government has expressed its intention to do so, while the US has shown a willingness to implement ambitious climate policies, including support for research on emissions reduction innovations.
The world must unite to reduce super pollutants and usher in a new era of cleaner air, improved food production and greater energy security. The public overwhelmingly supports measuring and mitigating methane emissions across sectors, and it is time for governments to listen.
A good first step would be for the US and China to set quantifiable non-carbon dioxide targets in their revised NDCs and encourage other large methane-emitting countries to do the same.
Marcelo Mena, CEO of Global Methane Hub, is a former Chilean minister of the environment. Sarah Ann Smith is energy program director at Global Methane Hub.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS