As summer in the northern hemisphere draws to a close, hundreds of temperature records have been broken, and there is a roughly 95 percent chance that this year would beat last year as the hottest year since measurements began. However, millions of people do not need data to tell them that — they are living through it.
The US last year experienced 28 climate-related disasters that each caused at least US$1 billion worth of damage, while China experienced extreme heat and devastating floods, with a typhoon displacing more than 120,000 people in Beijing.
It is clear that warming is occurring faster than expected, and that the world needs to pull an emergency brake on rising temperatures. China and the US, as global superpowers, could work together to drive change, and they recently held a high-level meeting to discuss opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
As these conversations continue ahead of this year’s UN Climate Change Conference (COP29) and into next year, they should focus on dealing with the climate crisis that has already arrived. To address it requires increased efforts to mitigate emissions of super pollutants, which are responsible for more than half of climate change.
Super pollutants, specifically warming agents such as methane, nitrous oxide, tropospheric ozone and hydrofluorocarbons are tens, hundreds or even thousands of times more potent than carbon dioxide per tonne.
Methane is a GHG that is roughly 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide over a 20-year period and contributes to ozone smog. However, it remains in the atmosphere for only about a decade, whereas carbon dioxide can last centuries. This means that reducing methane emissions is the fastest and most effective way to fight climate change and improve air quality.
Cleaner air is especially important for communities living or working near cattle farms, oil and gas infrastructure, landfills and other pollution sources. Deteriorating air quality has become a pressing public health problem, and reducing methane levels in the atmosphere would lower rates of death and asthma, and lessen the severity of wildfires, flooding, hurricanes and other extreme weather events.
The good news is that there are ways to cut methane emissions by as much as 45 percent, which could reduce warming by 0.3°C by 2040, bolster energy and food security, and put the world on a path to a healthier future.
In addition to the broad public support for government intervention to address methane emissions, there is also global consensus on the need to address non-carbon dioxide GHGs. To date, 158 countries have signed the Global Methane Pledge to cut emissions by 30 percent by 2030. At last year’s COP28 in Dubai, countries agreed to submit updated 2035 emissions reduction targets, known as nationally determined contributions (NDCs), that are economy-wide, cover all GHGs and are aligned with limiting global warming to 1.5°C.
Increased global attention to non-carbon dioxide GHGs could not come at a better time, as updated NDCs are due in February next year.
While NDCs contain meaningful carbon dioxide reduction targets, they often lack concrete, measurable goals for cutting super pollutants. Countries must recognize that this approach does not fully address the fight against climate change and raise their ambitions accordingly.
Strong 2035 targets for methane and other super pollutants are necessary to achieve net zero GHG emissions by 2050 and would reduce potentially irreversible planetary changes.
Methane has historically been hard to track, making it difficult to include specific targets in NDCs. However, after addressing critical funding and technology gaps, methane-detecting satellites are improving data collection. Satellite programs launched after the previous NDC update, including MethaneSAT, Carbon Mapper and the WasteMAP, have helped local authorities pinpoint and address emissions sources. Given these developments, there is no excuse for submitting NDCs without methane targets.
China and the US can build on the climate commitments they made in last year’s Sunnylands Statement by including robust super pollutant targets in their updated NDCs. The Chinese government has expressed its intention to do so, while the US has shown a willingness to implement ambitious climate policies, including support for research on emissions reduction innovations.
The world must unite to reduce super pollutants and usher in a new era of cleaner air, improved food production and greater energy security. The public overwhelmingly supports measuring and mitigating methane emissions across sectors, and it is time for governments to listen.
A good first step would be for the US and China to set quantifiable non-carbon dioxide targets in their revised NDCs and encourage other large methane-emitting countries to do the same.
Marcelo Mena, CEO of Global Methane Hub, is a former Chilean minister of the environment. Sarah Ann Smith is energy program director at Global Methane Hub.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS