In the frothy business of selling artificial intelligence (AI) service, Salesforce Inc has been punching above its own weight.
“Salesforce?” I hear you wonder. The folks in the dull business of selling customer relationship management software?
Yes, and they are getting aggressive about AI too. The company has just become the first major tech firm to launch a new breed of generative AI tools known as “agents,” which others on the cutting edge of the field have long talked about without delivering anything. Unlike its peers, Salesforce is explicit about how its novel tools would displace jobs. The approach is bold, but could be what is needed to push the firm ahead in the AI race as younger companies such as OpenAI and Anthropic encroach on its territory.
Illustration: Yusha
You can attribute this feistiness to larger-than-life Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff, whose maverick strategies helped him spearhead the Software as a Service (SaaS) revolution, and grabbed him a client base that includes 90 percent of Fortune 500 companies, including Walt Disney Co and Ford Motor Co. Salesforce makes money by selling subscriptions to applications, such as Sales Cloud and Service Cloud, which companies use to keep track of their sales and customer service processes. Salesforce’s big pitch at Dreamforce this week — its lavish conference that all but takes over downtown San Francisco each year — was Agentforce, a new service that lets customers deploy autonomous AI-powered agents.
Bots are out and agents are in, Salesforce said. The former are the chatbots, powered by technology from firms such as OpenAI, Google and Anthropic, that sit in the corner of a Web site and can answer a customer’s questions. Now, instead of just dispensing information, agents can take action. They can file a complaint, book an appointment or change a shipping address on file.
“Taking action” might sound like a huge risk for businesses to make with AI, given that generative models are known to hallucinate, and chatbots have occasionally given erroneous information to customers. Imagine an AI model mishandling a booking.
Salesforce says that would not be a problem.
“Hallucinations go down to zero, because [Agentforce] is only allowed to generate content from the sources you’ve trained it on,” Salesforce corporate strategy director Bill Patterson said.
That makes it more reliable than OpenAI, which scrapes the public Internet and all its false content, he added.
That is a daring premise. What is also daring: Salesforce has become quite comfortable addressing an issue that AI companies until now have mostly tiptoed around — that success for their business customers is measured by cutting costs, AKA fewer jobs.
One executive from a separate AI company recently said that their enterprise customers were hesitant to go public as a case study, because they feared reputational blowback. Slashing jobs is not a great look.
However, Salesforce had several case studies to point to on Tuesday last week, such as education publisher John Wiley & Sons Inc, which used Agentforce over the past three months to nearly halve the time spent answering customer inquiries.
August and September are when Wiley normally hires many more people to handle the spike in demand from students going back to school, but with Agentforce it did not have to shell out on new recruits, Salesforce said.
“What if you could surge your service organization and you could surge your sales organization without hiring more people?” Benioff asked in his keynote. “That’s Agentforce.”
Benioff reportedly rewrote his keynote days before the conference, because he believed he had to address the “deep frustration around AI.” One result seems to be that he did not hold back. Just to underscore Salesforce’s belief that Agentforce would replace humans, the company has flipped its business model for the service. Instead of charging per head, which would mean its revenue only grows if its customers hired more people, Agentforce charges US$2 “per conversation.” So if a client such as Wiley hires fewer workers, it can still pay Salesforce more. It is a shrewd pricing strategy.
Time will tell if businesses record a return on investment from Salesforce’s newfangled tools, particularly when many firms are finding it difficult to measure the success of generative AI. However, it marks a clear threat to newer firms such as OpenAI and Anthropic — which have admitted behind closed doors that they use Salesforce themselves — and that what they are offering to customers is an additional service to Salesforce’s CRM software. For many chief innovation officers, it is far easier to tell their sales staff that they can just keep using Salesforce, which is already plugged into their data and processes, rather than get used to yet another thing on their computers. Nobody wants to have to look at yet another thing.
Salesforce’s entrenched, wide distribution puts it in a strong position at a time when larger companies are generally slow about adopting new tech, including generative AI. Its undaunted approach to job displacement suggests it intends to make lots of money from this venture, too. When it comes to selling to businesses, AI firms might face a formidable competitor.
Parmy Olson is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology. A former reporter for the Wall Street Journal and Forbes, she is author of We Are Anonymous.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS