Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) officially began its two-week presidential race on Thursday last week. The nine candidates took part in a debate two days after the announcement and the winner of the election would be announced on Friday.
In the fierce debate, Shinjiro Koizumi, the second son of former prime minister Junichiro Koizumi, and Shigeru Ishiba, former LDP secretary-general, both leading in the polls, were attacked from all sides.
Ishiba, who is making his fifth bid to lead the party, was calm and composed.
Shinjiro Koizumi, making his first bid to lead the party, frequently provided irrelevant answers dubbed “nonsense talk” by Japanese media who said he was incapable of delivering a convincing narrative.
Polling published by the Japanese-language Yomiuri Shimbun on Tuesday last week, which surveyed the party’s rank-and-file members and party supporters showed that Ishiba had the support of 26 percent of respondents, closely followed by Japanese Minister of State for Economic Security Sanae Takaichi at 25 percent, and Shinjiro Koizumi third with 16 percent.
Other candidates only garnered support in the single-digit percentage points.
Out of 352 LDP Diet members who responded in the same poll, Shinjiro Koizumi was backed by 45 of them, followed by Takaich at 29 and Ishiba at 26.
In the projected tally for all voters, including party members, supporters and Diet members, Takaichi and Ishiba were tied with 123 votes, closely followed by Koizumi with 105 votes.
This showed that Koizumi is not as popular among the party’s rank-and-file members and party supporters as Takaichi.
This suggests a trend.
Koizumi does not outshine in a three-horse race.
If there is no clear winner in the first round of voting, leading to a top-two runoff, the following matches are expected.
First: Koizumi versus Ishiba.
According to Yomiuri Shimbun’s poll, Koizumi is the most popular among LDP Diet members, with Ishiba far behind. Ishiba would likely lose in a runoff against Koizumi.
Second: Ishiba versus Takaichi.
If Takaichi rises above the others, the conservatives would support her. In this runoff, Ishiba would barely stand a chance against the attack of the diehard conservative followers of former deputy prime minister Taro Aso’s faction and late prime minister Shinzo Abe’s faction.
Takaichi would likely become the first female prime minister of Japan in such a scenario.
Third: Koizumi versus Takaichi.
If Ishiba loses in the first round, Aso’s faction would likely support Takaichi and former prime minister Yoshihide Suga’s faction would likely support Koizumi in the runoff — resulting in a contest between the two kingmakers.
If Takaichi garners support from Abe’s faction, she would have a competitive edge.
No matter who wins this election, the Japanese government would continue being a staunch US ally supporter of Taiwan.
This would not easily change given the general public is anti-China and pro-Taiwan.
The LDP presidential election is diverse and competitive: old versus young; male versus female; conservative versus reformist — and internecine strife. It is riveting.
Voters get to choose from many capable candidates. Opinions might differ, but they are reasonable differences.
The race would no doubt end peacefully, as a river runs into the sea. After all, it is a Japanese-style election.
Wang Hui-sheng is chief director of the Kisei Ladies’ and Children’s Hospital in Japan and a founding member of the East Asian Research Institute.
Translated by Fion Khan
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS