Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) officially began its two-week presidential race on Thursday last week. The nine candidates took part in a debate two days after the announcement and the winner of the election would be announced on Friday.
In the fierce debate, Shinjiro Koizumi, the second son of former prime minister Junichiro Koizumi, and Shigeru Ishiba, former LDP secretary-general, both leading in the polls, were attacked from all sides.
Ishiba, who is making his fifth bid to lead the party, was calm and composed.
Shinjiro Koizumi, making his first bid to lead the party, frequently provided irrelevant answers dubbed “nonsense talk” by Japanese media who said he was incapable of delivering a convincing narrative.
Polling published by the Japanese-language Yomiuri Shimbun on Tuesday last week, which surveyed the party’s rank-and-file members and party supporters showed that Ishiba had the support of 26 percent of respondents, closely followed by Japanese Minister of State for Economic Security Sanae Takaichi at 25 percent, and Shinjiro Koizumi third with 16 percent.
Other candidates only garnered support in the single-digit percentage points.
Out of 352 LDP Diet members who responded in the same poll, Shinjiro Koizumi was backed by 45 of them, followed by Takaich at 29 and Ishiba at 26.
In the projected tally for all voters, including party members, supporters and Diet members, Takaichi and Ishiba were tied with 123 votes, closely followed by Koizumi with 105 votes.
This showed that Koizumi is not as popular among the party’s rank-and-file members and party supporters as Takaichi.
This suggests a trend.
Koizumi does not outshine in a three-horse race.
If there is no clear winner in the first round of voting, leading to a top-two runoff, the following matches are expected.
First: Koizumi versus Ishiba.
According to Yomiuri Shimbun’s poll, Koizumi is the most popular among LDP Diet members, with Ishiba far behind. Ishiba would likely lose in a runoff against Koizumi.
Second: Ishiba versus Takaichi.
If Takaichi rises above the others, the conservatives would support her. In this runoff, Ishiba would barely stand a chance against the attack of the diehard conservative followers of former deputy prime minister Taro Aso’s faction and late prime minister Shinzo Abe’s faction.
Takaichi would likely become the first female prime minister of Japan in such a scenario.
Third: Koizumi versus Takaichi.
If Ishiba loses in the first round, Aso’s faction would likely support Takaichi and former prime minister Yoshihide Suga’s faction would likely support Koizumi in the runoff — resulting in a contest between the two kingmakers.
If Takaichi garners support from Abe’s faction, she would have a competitive edge.
No matter who wins this election, the Japanese government would continue being a staunch US ally supporter of Taiwan.
This would not easily change given the general public is anti-China and pro-Taiwan.
The LDP presidential election is diverse and competitive: old versus young; male versus female; conservative versus reformist — and internecine strife. It is riveting.
Voters get to choose from many capable candidates. Opinions might differ, but they are reasonable differences.
The race would no doubt end peacefully, as a river runs into the sea. After all, it is a Japanese-style election.
Wang Hui-sheng is chief director of the Kisei Ladies’ and Children’s Hospital in Japan and a founding member of the East Asian Research Institute.
Translated by Fion Khan
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS