Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year.
A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states.
To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions.
According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s population rapidly increased in the 1980s from about 2.27 million to a record high of nearly 2.72 million in 1990. The city’s population then fell slightly, but remained steady at about 2.6 million for more than two decades.
However, it has steadily declined since 2016, dropping to about 2.48 million — below the 2.5 million threshold — in 2022, which reduced the city’s deputy mayors from three to two when Chiang took office in December of that year.
Taipei’s population rose slightly above 2.5 million last year, which experts said was mainly due to Taiwanese living abroad returning to the city to register their household registration after the national borders reopened with the end of the COVID-19 pandemic.
While Chiang has not appointed a third deputy mayor, the city’s population has been declining again this year — to 2,502,093 by the end of last month — and is expected to fall below 2.5 million by the end of this month.
Chiang said birth and parenting-friendly policies contributed to the increase of about 1,500 newborns last year and about 775 in the first eight months of this year.
However, despite the increasing number of newborns, the number of people moving out of the city exceeded that of those moving into it, in each month of this year, with a total loss of 7,197 city residents in the first eight months of this year, city government data showed.
Experts, government officials and members of the public have pointed to Taipei’s high housing prices and high cost of living, as well as convenient public transportation to the city, as contributing to many young people preferring to live in nearby New Taipei City, Taoyuan or Keelung and commute to Taipei.
An analysis of people flow data using anonymized mobile network data, released by the Ministry of the Interior on Friday, seems to support their assumptions.
It showed that about one-quarter (25.2 percent) of the day-time population in Taipei return and stay in New Taipei City in the evening, while 2 percent return to Taoyuan and 1.4 percent return to Keelung.
Data from the global crowd-sourced database Numbeo showed that the property price-to-income ratio in Taipei last year was 28.7, higher than Singapore at 15.7 and Japan at 9.8.
Data compiled by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics showed that Taipei’s average household spending last year was about NT$1.09 million (US$34,103), the highest of the six special municipalities.
As several factors contributing to the city’s falling population have been identified, the government should not only implement short-term policies to help arrest the decline such as by providing childcare subsidies and prioritizing young couples for social housing, but also come up with policies to address long-term problems such as the housing crisis and wage stagnation, which discourages many young people from settling down and starting a family in Taipei.
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
Historically, in Taiwan, and in present-day China, many people advocate the idea of a “great Chinese nation.” It is not worth arguing with extremists to say that the so-called “great Chinese nation” is a fabricated political myth rather than an academic term. Rather, they should read the following excerpt from Chinese writer Lin Yutang’s (林語堂) book My Country and My People: “It is also inevitable that I should offend many writers about China, especially my own countrymen and great patriots. These great patriots — I have nothing to do with them, for their god is not my god, and their patriotism is
RSS