“Pregnancy brain” is often treated as a punchline, but a new study shows it is a stunning metamorphosis that scientists are just beginning to grasp — potentially unlocking new knowledge about pregnancy complications and the amazing plasticity of our most complex organ.
The research, published last week in Nature Neuroscience, offers the first detailed look at the incredible transformation of the human brain during pregnancy. It is an ambitious and overdue exploration of the ways that the major life event affects women’s short and long-term health.
“Pregnancy is like a stress test for the body,” says Emily Jacobs, director of University of California (UC) Santa Barbara’s Ann S. Bowers Women’s Brain Health Initiative, and a coauthor of the study. The massive changes include shifts in hormone levels and the immune system, and more work for organs like the heart and kidneys.
Illustration: Constance Chou
However, few details have been known about the changes to the brain. Jacobs points out that less than half of a percent of the 50,000 brain imaging studies published since the 1990s specifically focus on women’s health.
The previous studies we do have, while important first steps in this burgeoning field of maternal brain mapping, only captured images of the brain before and after childbirth (with one recent large study also getting a peek during the third trimester). The UC researchers went much further. Magnetic Resonance Imaging was conducted before conception, every few weeks during gestation, and two years after birth for a total of 26 scans — ultimately offering a more comprehensive picture of the brain’s transformation during and after pregnancy.
GRAY MATTER
“This approach captures subtle neural variations that might otherwise go unnoticed, enhancing our comprehension of brain adaptations during this critical period,” Ann-Marie de Lange, head of FemiLab at Lausanne University Hospital in Switzerland, said in an e-mail.
Indeed, the researchers found what prior research would have missed: A metamorphosis driven by hormonal fluctuations, with some changes in the brain returning to baseline by birth and others persisting for years after. Most strikingly, nearly all parts of the cortex showed a reduction in gray matter, the tissue responsible for processing and interpreting information, commandeering things like movement and memory. That persisted in the years after birth.
That might sound alarming. The part of the brain responsible for processing is … shrinking? Jacobs compares the transformation to Michelangelo sitting before a block of marble. “The underlying beauty is revealed through the art of removal, carefully honing and fine-tuning the material.” In other words, this amazing display of neuroplasticity could potentially represent not a loss of function, but a gain in efficiency as women prepare for parenthood. It is an exercise in cortical refinement that the brain undertakes at a few distinct stages of a woman’s life — adolescence, matrescence and again during menopause.
They also found transient increases in the quality of connections in the brain tissue known as white matter, peaking in the second and third trimester before returning to baseline at birth (a shift previous studies would have missed).
We would need more research to tell us what this metamorphosis means for human behavior. Animal scans have linked certain brain changes to a mother’s sensitivity to smells and sounds from her newborns and maternal behavior like nest building and grooming.
“Obviously, humans are way more complicated,” Jacobs said, adding that parental behavior manifests in partners, grandparents, adoptive parents and many others who did not grow a child in their body.
KNOWLEDGE GAPS
To further their knowledge, the UC team has already captured biweekly snapshots of the brains of seven additional pregnant women and plans to recruit up to 20 people. Eventually, more than 200 first-time mothers would be followed monthly as part of a partnership with researchers in Spain.
The hope is to illuminate changes in the brain during pregnancy across women from many walks of life to help scientists better understand the underlying mechanisms of and risks for conditions like preeclampsia, migraines and postpartum depression. To get at answers, researchers would need to look not only at the anatomical changes in the brain, but study the vascular and functional ones, says Joana Pinto, a neuroimaging expert who leads Oxford’s Maternal Brian Project.
Take pre-eclampsia, a dangerous condition typically marked by soaring blood pressure. All pregnant women experience increased blood flow to the brain during pregnancy, but something goes awry in women with preeclampsia, explains Pinto. Much more research is needed to understand that process and whether the wear and tear on the blood vessels during pregnancy might affect brain health later in life. (Some studies suggest, for example, it could raise the risk of developing dementia.)
Women’s health has been understudied for far too long. That neglect stems in part from erroneous assumptions that studying men’s brains is enough. “Thankfully, there is a growing understanding that these fluctuations play a dynamic role in brain structure and function, and that findings based on male participants do not necessarily apply to women — we are not just smaller versions of men,” says De Lange.
Studies like this one are critical to closing the egregious knowledge gap in the field of neurobiology — and in medicine overall.
Lisa Jarvis is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering biotech, health care and the pharmaceutical industry. Previously, she was executive editor of Chemical & Engineering News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of