The Australian Senate and the Dutch House of Representatives have passed motions clarifying that UN Resolution 2758 concerns only China’s representation at the UN and has nothing to do with Taiwan.
Legislators from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have called for support for their legislative proposal that would reject Beijing’s distortion and manipulation of the UN resolution that it says justifies its claims over Taiwan, saying that the UN statement has nothing to do with Taiwan’s sovereignty and its international status.
The text of the UN resolution was brief, recognizing the People’s Republic of China as the only legitimate representative of China to the UN without mentioning “Taiwan” or even “the Republic of China.”
There would have been no room for manipulation, but Beijing disingenuously relates the resolution to its “one China principle.”
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) responded by neglecting the DPP’s legislative proposal. Is that not walking into a diplomatic trap set by Beijing?
Historically speaking, it was Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) who defined the resolution as “expelling our country and admitting the ‘bandits,’” rejecting a resolution proposed by Saudi Arabia and backed by the US, which would have reserved a seat for Taiwan at the UN.
Now that the KMT has long given up “retaking the mainland,” while its former mantra of “gentlemen cannot coexist with bandits” has been transformed into “one family across the Taiwan Strait,” there is no reason to oppose Taiwan’s participation at the UN. However, not daring to say no to Beijing, the KMT has no choice but to fool the public with the same old excuse — that it would provoke China.
How about the TPP?
As a newcomer in the political arena, the party does not have the KMT’s historical baggage. TPP caucus whip Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), a former member of the New Power Party, rose to power after the Sunflower Movement, a protest movement against the passage of the KMT-proposed cross-strait service trade agreement.
There is no reason for Huang to reject or neglect the DPP’s legislative proposal. The TPP does so just because it wants to oppose what the ruling party proposes, not to mention China’s Taiwan Affairs Office’s support for TPP Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), and TPP Legislator Chang Chi-kai’s (張啟楷) proposal to freeze the Presidential Office’s budget in retaliation for the DPP’s “political persecution” of Ko.
Has this not shown the TPP’s true nature?
In the Chinese literary classic Journey to the West (西遊記), the Monkey King defeats the White Bone Demon (白骨精). UN Resolution 2758 is the demon-revealing mirror reflecting the true nature of the KMT and the TPP.
The international community is interpreting the resolution in a correct way to show Taiwanese that they do not have to bow to Beijing’s pressure.
As the ruling party, the DPP’s proposal is a response to that support that shows the government is also not intimidated by Beijing, and is willing to overcome its diplomatic predicament and put an end to self-isolation. Now is the best time for Taiwan to enter the world stage.
Taiwanese should pressure the KMT and the TPP into supporting proposals that are beneficial for enhancing the nation’s international status, as they have a majority in the legislature. This would help ensure that Beijing and the rest of the world do not get the wrong signal.
The nation needs opposition parties that are loyal to Taiwan, as this would avoid the well-being of Taiwanese becoming a bet in the future democratic elections.
Hong Tsun-ming is a policy specialist in the Taiwan Statebuilding Party.
Translated by Fion Khan
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS