In recent years, countries around the world have expressed support for Taiwan’s independent and sovereign status. One key example is the clarification of UN Resolution 2758 — the US has taken great pains to explain that it is related to the representation issue brought about by the previous change in China’s political regime and that it does not involve Taiwan. The European Parliament and the Australian Senate have also spoken out on the issue. The Dutch House of Representatives on Thursday last week passed a motion in support of Taiwan, rejecting China’s attempts to distort the resolution.
Allies in the Asia-Pacific, the US, Australia, the Netherlands — which Taiwan has a historical connection with — and the EU have spoken out on Taiwan’s behalf, emphasizing that China and Taiwan are separate entities. It is just as President William Lai (賴清德) said — China and Taiwan are not subordinate to each other, and “one country on each side (一邊一國).” Taiwan must also make a stand — it cannot always let others speak for it.
To coincide with the ongoing 79th UN General Assembly meeting, the Taiwan United Nations Alliance demonstrated support for Taiwan to join the UN and organized an international press conference emphasizing that UN Resolution 2758 does not involve Taiwan. The conference’s purpose was to clearly explain that Taiwan has no connection with China.
Legislators from the three major political parties have traveled to the US to attend related events. Defending Taiwan’s sovereignty is a cause all Taiwanese should rally around, regardless of political affiliation. However, two legislators from the opposition parties have caused extreme disappointment.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Wu Tsung-hsien (吳宗憲) overtly became a deserter, completely failing to attend an event about UN Resolution 2758, Taiwan’s most important opportunity to declare its stance to the international community.
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator Wu Chun-cheng (吳春城) attended both events, asserting that Taiwan should not be excluded from any international organization. However, his rhetoric changed upon returning home. He referred to Taiwan as the “Republic of China (ROC),” seemingly unaware of the contradiction. The key point of the stance that UN Resolution 2758 does not involve Taiwan is that Taiwan has nothing to do with China. For him to argue this before turning around to emphasize Taiwan’s Chinese origins by using “ROC” makes it seem as if he has already forgotten.
To eat and drink Taiwanese food and water, but not support Taiwan must be condemned. We should also take this opportunity to self-reflect. The rest of the world has already decided the time has come to implement “one country on each side.”
How much longer would we continue to hold on to the harmful, good-for-nothing “ROC” — an empty shell that the KMT and the TPP use to cause trouble?
The TPP insists on abolishing the Control Yuan. If it wishes to atone for its crimes with good deeds, there is no harm in working with the Democratic Progressive Party to propose a constitutional amendment. It could eliminate the five-branch government system by abolishing the Examination Yuan and the Control Yuan, and transition to a three-branch government. This would normalize the country, allowing Taiwan to remove its shell once and for all.
If the TPP has the courage and insight to do this, it would be acknowledged as a truly Taiwanese political party, able to firmly plant its roots, and would no longer need to worry about losing its purpose in the absence of its chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲).
Tommy Lin is president of the Formosa Republican Association and the Taiwan United Nations Alliance.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s