The 53rd Pacific Islander’s Forum (PIF) took place in Tokyo from Aug. 26 to 30. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) infiltrated the forum through its proxy, the Solomon Islands, in an attempt to remove Taiwan as an observing member and “development partner.”
Australia, New Zealand and Taiwan’s diplomatic allies — the Marshall Islands, Palau and Tuvalu — jointly pushed back and stopped the motion. Despite this, the CCP still succeeded in manipulating Nauruan President and PIF Secretary-General Baron Waqa into cutting all references to Taiwan from the closing ceremony report. The CCP is intent on creating a future in which Taiwan is never mentioned.
From the East China Sea to the Taiwan Strait to the South China Sea, the CCP continues to bolster its foreign diplomacy strategies. However, the CCP’s “wolf warrior diplomacy” is sure to transform it into a pariah and troublemaker in the international community.
During COVID-19, Taiwan demonstrated the capabilities of its democratic governance and contributed to the global community, which allowed an ever-increasing number of countries to acknowledge its national values. Meanwhile, the CCP has responded by going out of its way to use money to threaten and subdue the PIF secretary-general into deleting anything written about Taiwan.
In the face of CCP pressure, Taiwan’s government should adopt a dynamic international cooperation strategy.
First, Taiwan should work closely with other democracies, including the US, Japan and Australia, through the Global Cooperation and Training Framework to provide aid to Pacific Island nations that are experiencing economic and climate change challenges.
Second, the government should look for other opportunities for international collaboration, such as the Australia-led Pacific Policing Initiative, and join the PIF’s “2050 Strategy for the Blue Pacific Continent” to help bring peace and prosperity to the Pacific Island nations.
In response to the CCP’s provocations, Taiwan should resolutely safeguard its own status and international participation. Not only does the nation need to seek support from democratic partner countries such as the US, Japan and those in Europe, it must also actively develop multilevel cooperation with Australia and other regional powerhouses, and enhance its national defense and diplomacy strategies to guarantee Taiwan’s long-term survival and influence in the PIF.
Gong Lin-dong is a research fellow who focuses on the Chinese Communist Party.
Translated by Tim Smith
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s